Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: What is the MOST weight you would ACCEPT in a Camaro coupe.
3,800 lbs
13
12.75%
3,700 lbs
16
15.69%
3,600 lbs
44
43.14%
3,500 lbs
18
17.65%
3,400 lbs
11
10.78%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

Ummmm.....about weight....

Old Dec 30, 2005 | 05:50 PM
  #61  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

honestly, i'd buy a camaro that weight 4000 lbs.. i'd gag, but i'd get over it

that said, i picked 3600 lbs... any more than that and i'll be dissapointed.. but i'd still buy it..

i'd LOVE it to weigh 3300-3400 but i don't see that happening in my wildest dreams
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #62  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by FS3800
honestly, i'd buy a camaro that weight 4000 lbs.. i'd gag, but i'd get over it

that said, i picked 3600 lbs... any more than that and i'll be dissapointed.. but i'd still buy it..

i'd LOVE it to weigh 3300-3400 but i don't see that happening in my wildest dreams
A 4,000 lbs Camaro. Hmmmmm.

I don't give a **** what collection of options it took, what reasoning there was, or what chain of events conspired to get a Camaro up to two tons.....but I would vomit on it violently and reject it completely. Not a chance I would buy one.

Last edited by Z284ever; Dec 30, 2005 at 07:29 PM.
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 08:51 PM
  #63  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by Z284ever
A 4,000 lbs Camaro. Hmmmmm.

I don't give a **** what collection of options it took, what reasoning there was, or what chain of events conspired to get a Camaro up to two tons.....but I would vomit on it violently and reject it completely. Not a chance I would buy one.
Charlie,

I am not quite sure how you feel about this subject, could you be a little more clear?
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 10:02 PM
  #64  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

I would like to ask one question, why would anyone think that the new Camaro is goint to weight MORE then a Cobra? The Cobra now only will have a heavier iron engine but they also added a blower to the motor. How much lighter does a LS1 weight then a '03 or '04 Cobra 4.6 iron engine with the blower? I would be amazed if the new Camaro weighted more then 3600lbs.

That being said, I question the accuracy of the weight of the Challenger in the C&D artical. We get a shorter car with the same under pinnnings of the LX cars. It sure isn't any bulkier then the other LX cars. The SRT8 Magnum weights just more then 4100lbs. No other LX HEMI car weights more then 4100lbs. So you subtract 2 doors, some length to the wheelbase, and you get a car as heavy as a wagon?
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 11:08 PM
  #65  
slayerxxx213's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 532
From: Jackson, NJ
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by Z284ever
A 4,000 lbs Camaro. Hmmmmm.

I don't give a **** what collection of options it took, what reasoning there was, or what chain of events conspired to get a Camaro up to two tons.....but I would vomit on it violently and reject it completely. Not a chance I would buy one.
Agreed...I would definitely join in on the violent vomiting fest

BTW: 200th post, WOOHOOO
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #66  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

What were loaded 2002 Camaro SS's weighing in at? Have crash and safety standards incresed since 2002? Will there be more equipment standard on this Camaro?
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 10:51 AM
  #67  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

I voted, up to 3600, BUT, I don't want a flemsy, stamped steel collection of suspension and steering parts, requiring me to replace EVERYTHING, and weld braces(as earlier models) to handle a reasonable amount of abuse...bringing the weight back up a couple of hundred pounds more.
I could go for some, fiberglass/ABS-plastic parts such as fenders, hood, trunk lid , door skins...as long as they don't wave in the wind, and can look good with black paint(ie; no dimples/wrinkles everywhere).
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #68  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

I might accept more in the other models (like SS), but in a z28 i would like nothing over 3,5XXlbs (3,600lbs flat max). I'd like for it to be relatively inline with the GT in terms of weight. The 5spd GT coupe right now is listed at 3,450lbs (about what the 4th gens weighed) so i would like z28 to be as close to that as possible.

On an SS, i would say the absolute max would be 3,700lbs tops and that's with every single option/fluff.

If the camaro is going to give up the hp advantage to challenger/GT500, then they need to make up for that with a lighter weight and better driving dynamics. From what i've heard, the other two cars are relative porkers (both 3800+).
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #69  
Z28Marcus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 528
From: The land of ice and snow.
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by eagleknight97
What were loaded 2002 Camaro SS's weighing in at? Have crash and safety standards incresed since 2002? Will there be more equipment standard on this Camaro?
For sure. But more strength and better protection doesn't have to mean 4000 lb car to meet current and furture standards. Better materials, design and engineering can go a long way. Except that costs money. Still, having improved fuel economy and performance in a 3600 lb car as well as being able to brag about meeting or surpsassing govt. standards is surely worth something in terms of sales? And it's not like research into making a 3600 lb Camaro that can do this is worthless... that same know how and knowledge is transferable to other vehicles and platforms. A safer car means reduced insurance premiums which certainly does play a part in people's buying habbits.

A 4000+ lb Camaro will be a huge and very disappointing cop-out. I don't think it will happen though.. today's GM isn't stupid enough to do that.. I hope .
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:31 AM
  #70  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by guionM
From there, the next example of a lightweight inexpensive IRS that's going to be brought up is the Kappa chassis. However, this isn't a good example either. The Kappa is as long as a Miata, yet weighs 3000 pounds.
This is incorrect. The Kappa cars weigh in at 2850. And there is the issue that was already brought about how a Miata manages to be 400lbs less than a Kappa, while maintaining a multilink IRS setup.

GTO and Mustang Cobra both weighed about 3750 pounds. Both were the same size.
This is also incorrect. Only the Cobra verts weighed in around 3750. The Cobra coupes were right around 3600lbs.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #71  
ehaase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 213
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by Z28Marcus
A 4000+ lb Camaro will be a huge and very disappointing cop-out. I don't think it will happen though.. today's GM isn't stupid enough to do that.. I hope .
I think that the size and weight of the Camaro will depend mostly upon the companion sedan model. The sedan will probably sell in higher volumes than the Camaro. Unless there is unique platform for the Camaro as there is for the Mustang (doubtful), the Camaro may well be heavier than most of you would like.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #72  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by ehaase
I think that the size and weight of the Camaro will depend mostly upon the companion sedan model. The sedan will probably sell in higher volumes than the Camaro. Unless there is unique platform for the Camaro as there is for the Mustang (doubtful), the Camaro may well be heavier than most of you would like.
Generally, I agree. However there will be substantial architectural differences between the Camaro and the Zeta sedans. And I also think some of the decisions made regarding content, (ie loss of AWD option in Camaro), were made partially to control weight in the coupe architecture. Weight is definitely something that GM's product developers are aware of - the question is, what if any lengths will they be willing to go to, to reduce it?

I hope that extra weight saving steps will be taken on Z/28 however. Let me be the first to say that I will happily do without power seat adjustments for it's hopefully Recaro-like seats. Hey it's a start.

Last edited by Z284ever; Jan 1, 2006 at 02:50 PM.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #73  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by Z284ever
I hope that extra weight saving steps will be taken on a Z/28 for example. Let me be the first to say that I will happily do without power seat adjustments for it's hopefully Recaro-like seats. Hey it's a start.
These types of things need to be done carefully so as to send the message that this was done for "weight reduction" and not because "GM is cheap." We'd still need a well designed high quality seat. Even so, if the car was a porker, these type of things wouldn't be perceived as "weight reducing actions." Still, this type of thing is not unheard of. Some cars like the $34,000 STi WRX still have manual seats.

I'd even be happy if the Z/28 didn't have any more HP than an SS - as long as it was much lighter and better handling... i.e. the "track car" of the bunch... like it used to be.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #74  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by mastrdrver
I would like to ask one question, why would anyone think that the new Camaro is goint to weigh MORE then a Cobra? The Cobra not only will have a heavier iron engine but they also added a blower to the motor. How much lighter does a LS1 weigh then a '03 or '04 Cobra 4.6 iron engine with the blower? I would be amazed if the new Camaro weighted more then 3600lbs.
Good point! On top of that, also figure the 4.6L Cobra motor is a DOHC engine, so there are 4 times as many cams!!! Twice as many valves as well, and all that goes along with it all (mile long timing chains and multiple timing gears). Hmmm, heavy, heavy! Then the weight difference of the IRS out back.
Originally Posted by RussStang
This is also incorrect. Only the Cobra verts weighed in around 3750. The Cobra coupes were right around 3600lbs.
OK, so if all this is true, Ford stuffed all that extra weight into the Cobra, yet they still came out around ~3600 lbs, then why should the Camaro be any more than that??? It's NOT a full frame car, and even if it WAS, why would it have to weigh ~2 tons?! (think Corvette here for a minute ... full frame ... LSx engine ... true dual exhaust ... IRS ... 18" & 19" wheels ... even with a convertible top ... 3262 lbs!! ).

I realize the 3130 lb Z06 is a bad example because of the aluminum/magnesium chassis, carbon-fibre body parts, and high price tag. We want the Camaro to be affordable, but why on earth does it need to weigh any more than it used to?! (~34xx lbs).
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 09:42 PM
  #75  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Ummmm.....about weight....

Originally Posted by number77
Are you sure the Challenger weighs that much man? The engine compartment was completely gutted.
I was wondering the same thing.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.