Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

No more Trans Am....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Reading between the lines, the news here is that the dealers begged for a "Trans Am" (which could also be the GTO or another coupe) and were turned down.

And it doesn't sound like GM outlined a clear brand strategy for Pontiac either, just that more trucks and suvs are coming.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #17  
TA76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 426
From: Birmingham, AL, USA
Thumbs up

Good post Guy, again I just don't understand this 'cannibalize' theory when it comes Firebird. Sheesh, it’s not like GM doesn't produce 2 or 3 variants of the same car anyway. I mean just look at the new crossover, they have 4 now!? Why when it comes to Firebird do they do a 180?

I think if Camaro is a roaring success, Pontiac dealers will be screaming for a Firebird! GMC squaked when they didn't get a version of the Colorado and BAM! we have the Canyon. Pontiac yelled for a Cobalt and KAPOW! they get the G5.
mail
mail1
mail2

Last edited by TA76; Apr 29, 2008 at 03:38 AM.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #18  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by flowmotion
Reading between the lines, the news here is that the dealers begged for a "Trans Am" (which could also be the GTO or another coupe) and were turned down.

And it doesn't sound like GM outlined a clear brand strategy for Pontiac either, just that more trucks and suvs are coming.
Originally Posted by 2001Firehawk
Pontiac will remain a car-only brand for the foreseeable future, dealers were told. But because of new legislation requiring vehicles to reach a fleet average of 35 mpg by 2020, Pontiac might not end up as GM's performance division, dealers said they were told.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #19  
Good Ph.D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
I'll believe in a new Taurus that's a knock out when I see it, and probably not then. All the cars on that platform are gumdroppy and pedestrian.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #20  
mike24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 237
From: united states
Interesting
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #21  
dav305z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 757
Fine, no Firebird. But why not a G5 coupe with its own sheetmetal and real performance credentials?

There are plenty of ways to build cheap, fast cars that fit under CAFE guidelines. Ask Honda, they've been doing it for years. And of course, some of Pontiac's best years were during the gas crunch of the 1970's. Higher fuel standards are not a good excuse for screwing the brand.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #22  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by Plague
Right. "The plan is being tweaked" for Pontiac but meanwhile here comes some new GMC/Buick models.

If Pontiac isn't GM's performance division, what is it?
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 06:40 PM
  #23  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Pontiac can do with out a Trans Am, but how about a G8 coupe?

Or maybe better yet (for CAFE and $4 gas) a Delta II coupe that looks just like a Trans Am.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 06:53 PM
  #24  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Z28x
Pontiac can do with out a Trans Am, but how about a G8 coupe?

Wouldn't that be the GTO?? For some reason I just don't see GM rushing to bring another GTO back to the states.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 07:15 PM
  #25  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Could the G8 work as a 2 door as well? That'd be kinda neat (G8 with 2 doors badged as a GTO)
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #26  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Wouldn't that be the GTO?? For some reason I just don't see GM rushing to bring another GTO back to the states.
correct, but this time they could offer the G8 coupe (V6 only) and the GTO, L76 and LS3
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #27  
mike24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 237
From: united states
Why not a Delta II and call it Firebird and not "Trans Am" (since GM doesnt own "Trans Am")

Firebird name has history.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #28  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by mike24
Why not a Delta II and call it Firebird and not "Trans Am" (since GM doesnt own "Trans Am")

Firebird name has history.
That is a good idea, but I would never have said that out loud around here If it carried the Firebird name I'd want AWD to be standard.

Last edited by Z28x; Feb 12, 2008 at 08:50 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #29  
mike24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 237
From: united states
Personally I wouldnt mind an AWD turbo V6 Firebird aggressivley styled, Something that offers a difference between a Firebird and the New Camaro

Its one Idea Since I dont think we're gonna see a Camaro Clone.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #30  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Plague
The Impala LTZ gets better mileage than the Aura XR, and pretty much matches the Aura XE. Crazy world.
The Impala LTZ has the 3.9 AFM engine with 233hp, while the Aura XR has the 3.6 HFV6 with 251hp.

I'd expect the LTZ to do a bit better, since both it and the Aura XR are close in weight.

But the Aura XE and Impala LS should be identical with their 3.5s.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.