Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #76  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by Evil Turbo SS
If the Cobalt SS is 22k I find it hard that the Solstice with FI will be 25 k... Im thinkig more like 27k....
That's what I'm thinking as well. My estimate is about $24 - $26. I'm also thinking that base Solstice will be lucky if it's below $22K.

When does it go on sale, fall as 2006 model?
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #77  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by muckz
That's what I'm thinking as well. My estimate is about $24 - $26. I'm also thinking that base Solstice will be lucky if it's below $22K.

When does it go on sale, fall as 2006 model?
Pontiac's website says "around $20,000".
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #78  
Big Red Jim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 135
From: In front of you
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by muckz
we don't know yet, more people here would put their money on the SS, myself included.
Based on what? Even WITH the LSD, the Cobalt barely has an edge on lateral grip and transitions, but is way outgunned in the power department. On the straights and sweepers it would get decimated.

With the same magazine testing in the 1/4 mile, there's nearly a 5mph difference and half a second. That's not a slight power difference, that's night and day.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #79  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by Big Red Jim
Based on what? Even WITH the LSD, the Cobalt barely has an edge on lateral grip and transitions, but is way outgunned in the power department. On the straights and sweepers it would get decimated.

With the same magazine testing in the 1/4 mile, there's nearly a 5mph difference and half a second. That's not a slight power difference, that's night and day.
You use words that are inappropriate. "clobbered" "way outgunned" and "decimated"?

Hardly.

I think the Cobalt SS will give the SRT-4 a good run for it's money. You are obviously biased by your purchase decision. You have a SRT-4 and you haven't even raced a Cobalt SS yet, but you have already decided that you will clobber them and decimate them. Why don't you look at the facts.

The Cobalt looks that it will easily be a competitor with the SRT-4. Don't let your bias sway your comments.

Dan
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #80  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by Big Red Jim
Based on what? Even WITH the LSD, the Cobalt barely has an edge on lateral grip and transitions, but is way outgunned in the power department. On the straights and sweepers it would get decimated.

With the same magazine testing in the 1/4 mile, there's nearly a 5mph difference and half a second. That's not a slight power difference, that's night and day.

I hope it does get "decimated". That would mean that one out of ten times it would loose! Pretty good odds if you ask me!

Last edited by Evil Turbo SS; Jan 3, 2005 at 07:24 PM.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #81  
Big Red Jim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 135
From: In front of you
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by stereomandan
You use words that are inappropriate.
Well, just going by the 1/4 mile numbers, it's painfully obvious that there's a large power disparity. A half second and nearly 5mph isn't a small difference by any stretch of the imagination. Go run a 99-04 Mustang GT against an LS-1 F-body, cars which share about the same difference in ET/Trap speed. Then tell me it's not a huge difference in power.

You have a SRT-4 and you haven't even raced a Cobalt SS yet, but you have already decided that you will clobber them and decimate them.
You're right; I haven't. Motor Trend got numbers that I've only been able to best by .1. Ceteris Paribus, I will beat a Cobalt in real life just like the magazine did.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #82  
MissedShift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 858
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

I think we're all missing an important point...Even though it is ~$2000 more than SRT-4, Cobalt comes out of the gate with an important advantage...

Its not a neon...

Old Jan 3, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #83  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by MissedShift
I think we're all missing an important point...Even though it is ~$2000 more than SRT-4
Make it $800 USD.

Or, $2200 USD LESS than SRT-4 in Canada.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #84  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

The standard loaded cobalt is only $800 more than SRT-4 , go see for yourself at KBB.com

Big red Jim - As I said before , you cant base all your smack of 1 friggen magazine time . Theres been a few road test in magazines where the neon has ran 13.9 all the way up to 14.5 's . Your holy SRT-4 may have a "slight" power advantage , but its hardly a runaway like you would like to believe . And thats all Im gonna say till I see the 2 together on a road course or drag strip . Where power is gonna be a biggie , but so will gear ratios , final drive and the gearbox , weight ect ect ect. To many varibles .
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #85  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
The standard loaded cobalt is only $800 more than SRT-4 , go see for yourself at KBB.com

Big red Jim - As I said before , you cant base all your smack of 1 friggen magazine time . Theres been a few road test in magazines where the neon has ran 13.9 all the way up to 14.5 's . Your holy SRT-4 may have a "slight" power advantage , but its hardly a runaway like you would like to believe . And thats all Im gonna say till I see the 2 together on a road course or drag strip . Where power is gonna be a biggie , but so will gear ratios , final drive and the gearbox , weight ect ect ect. To many varibles .
By the "stats" i dont think the srt-4 will out perform the Cobalt SS in an auto X course. A road corse would depend on the layout of the track...
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 09:53 PM
  #86  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by Evil Turbo SS
By the "stats" i dont think the srt-4 will out perform the Cobalt SS in an auto X course. A road corse would depend on the layout of the track...
I agree .
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:12 PM
  #87  
Big Red Jim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 135
From: In front of you
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
Your holy SRT-4 may have a "slight" power advantage , but its hardly a runaway like you would like to believe .
Nearly 5mph additional trap speed is a runaway. Period. Same magazine tested in controlled conditions. The only way you can really compare them.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #88  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by Big Red Jim
Nearly 5mph additional trap speed is a runaway. Period. Same magazine tested in controlled conditions. The only way you can really compare them.

The only real way to compare them is to run them both on the same day in the same conditions with the same driver that has never been in either car given the same amout of time to learn each car before the offcial data is collected.

The second way is over time with a average of each car tested by multiple mags multiple times with many differnt drivers and conditions. The cobalt hasnt had this happen yet so we cant use this one witch is not as good as the first way I listed.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #89  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

On the subject of traps, I think the SRT-4 will prove to be the faster of the two....simply based off its 220+fwhp dyno's and 240+fwtq. It definitly has the SS outgunned in the power/tq department, that's for sure. Guess we'll know the real difference soon enough anyways.
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 11:28 PM
  #90  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Re: M/T gets 14.5@98.2 with Cobalt SS

Originally Posted by Big Red Jim
Nearly 5mph additional trap speed is a runaway. Period. Same magazine tested in controlled conditions. The only way you can really compare them.
The article quoted has SS at 98.2 mph. I have yet to see SRT run more than 101. So where is the 5 mph from?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.