GXP is finally available to build on GMCanada web site.
Re: GXP is finally available to build on GMCanada web site.
Originally Posted by Toukijin
I'm having some trouble with the whole GXP Grand Prix thing. That thing being the different sized tires on this car, fronts are 255's whilst the rear are 225's. Being that this is a FWD'er, rotating the tires aren't possible with this set up, meaning that you'll be eating up the front tires every 25-30k miles (maybe even sooner) and right now 18" tires aren't cheap. Did anyone at think of this before going ahead with this half assed idea of torque steer management??? 

Besides, there are lots of cars that do not permit normal tire rotations. The Vette, for example. Pretty much any Porsche or Ferrari. Honda S2000 (?). Sure, those are sports cars, though not all are super expensive (like the S2000). Lots of people daily drive Vettes and S2000s though.
Somehow I'm pretty sure the lack of ability to rotate the tires was considered. Heck, info like that has to show up in the owner's manual so uninformed customers don't try to do a front to rear rotation.
Re: GXP is finally available to build on GMCanada web site.
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
I'm not usually a big fan of silver cars, but that looks really sharp. I love the way the 18s set off the new GP. 17s are a minimum on that body (and 16s look too small on it, imo).
I think people should drive the car; it will really surprise some of you. Congrats again on the new ride.

Re: GXP is finally available to build on GMCanada web site.
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
It isn't really for torque steer; they actually took the car to real road courses and found that it handled better with the slightly wider front tires. If it were only for torque steer or off the line grip, they could have put the same tires at all four corners. The GXP is a more fully developed package than even the Comp G version of the GTP, I believe.
Besides, there are lots of cars that do not permit normal tire rotations. The Vette, for example. Pretty much any Porsche or Ferrari. Honda S2000 (?). Sure, those are sports cars, though not all are super expensive (like the S2000). Lots of people daily drive Vettes and S2000s though.
Somehow I'm pretty sure the lack of ability to rotate the tires was considered. Heck, info like that has to show up in the owner's manual so uninformed customers don't try to do a front to rear rotation.
Besides, there are lots of cars that do not permit normal tire rotations. The Vette, for example. Pretty much any Porsche or Ferrari. Honda S2000 (?). Sure, those are sports cars, though not all are super expensive (like the S2000). Lots of people daily drive Vettes and S2000s though.
Somehow I'm pretty sure the lack of ability to rotate the tires was considered. Heck, info like that has to show up in the owner's manual so uninformed customers don't try to do a front to rear rotation.
What I've seen in most FWD'er where the owner of the car was ignorant in keeping the tire rotated around, that owner was chaging tires every 25k miles or so while the original pair of rear tires just went along for the ride until the either dry rotted and gace out or wore so unevenly that there is a loud rumbling sound eminating from the rear of the car: and at (roughly) $150 a pop 4 an 18" tire there are going 2 be alot of pissed off GXP owners because their tires gave up the ghost too soon.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Fbodfather
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
Jun 21, 2002 04:12 PM



