Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM top Exec. don't want to give up anything?

Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:23 PM
  #91  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
So was today the last day the execs are in front of congress?
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #92  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Originally Posted by mdenz3
That story is a joke. I'm willing to bet Rick didn't go on that trip alone. Even if they did take a commercial plane they would the be paying to have their private jet just sitting there wasting money.
A joke?

It's like showing up at a food kitchen in a Limo and asking for a free meal.

It was an incredibly stupid thing to do while begging for money from the government.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #93  
shadydavy 95 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 164
From: Korea
These car execs should be treated like football coaches then. Fail to perform, and you're OUT. A struggling coach at a historically winning program doesn't stay long if he can't right the ship. By that way of thinking, Wagoner wouldn't have made it to the year 2000, much less 2008. You think Charlie Weis or Rich Rodriguez will be around much longer if they don't start winning?

Sorry for the sports analogy---but if GM were a team most of us would have bailed on them by now. Heck, the stadium would have closed and they would've moved to another city.

I know, I know--apples to oranges. But Ghosn did it at Nissan and Mulally looks to be doing it at Ford (if a GM failure doesn't bring the blue oval down as well).
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #94  
Ultra_Dog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 509
I saw a congressman grill them about them riding in corporate jets while begging for handouts. The camera swung around to see their reaction...their facial expressions were priceless! They had no answer.

..another congressman asked about manufacturing in Mexico, China and Canada and why should Americans bail those countries out. GM is working to build cars in China and import them back into the US.

...meanwhile, the billionaires are doing all they can do bankrupt the automakers so that the will jettison the pensions (dump them on you and me via pension guarnanty corporation) and other healthcare support. The unions have given up everything and have zero clout anymore.

Goodbye medical care. Goodbye pensions. Work until they don't need you, and then hurry up and die.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #95  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
The plane and pilot are already paid for. You're probably looking at a burn of about 1000pph for the plane, for a 400 mile trip. Just for giggles, call it 4000 lbs round trip. at $4/gal for Jet A, you're talking about $2400 total for the round trip for the whole GM contingent. Figure half a dozen suits total=$400 per person, round trip. That's nothing. You'd be lucky to get a walkup fare on Southwest for that. If they had flown commercial, they would get skewered for pandering to DC while their paid for corporate jet sits unused at DTW.

The politicians were showboating and making a scene so they can get on the news and appear to be standing up against corporate greed to their constituants. It was the same thing when they put them all on the spot about their willingness to work for a dollar. I'd like to put the question to every member of congress as well.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:21 AM
  #96  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Originally Posted by clean
the plane and pilot are already paid for. You're probably looking at a burn of about 1000pph for the plane, for a 400 mile trip. Just for giggles, call it 4000 lbs round trip. At $4/gal for jet a, you're talking about $2400 total for the round trip for the whole gm contingent. Figure half a dozen suits total=$400 per person, round trip. That's nothing. You'd be lucky to get a walkup fare on southwest for that. If they had flown commercial, they would get skewered for pandering to dc while their paid for corporate jet sits unused at dtw.

The politicians were showboating and making a scene so they can get on the news and appear to be standing up against corporate greed to their constituants. It was the same thing when they put them all on the spot about their willingness to work for a dollar. I'd like to put the question to every member of congress as well.

hey!!!! Stop confusing us with facts!!!!!!
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #97  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Wow. Just - wow. The rest of the folks look to be from dying or dead giants of the past - a bunch of thumbsuckers that continue to support the employment of paste-eaters. I'd like to see each Board member hauled in front of Congress to explain what they've done in an attempt to help GM's transition into a sustainable 21st-century transportation company.
MMMMMMMMMMMM............have you looked at the board of directors of any other public company????

(.....but I WILL make sure you're on the next ballot.......'kay?......)
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:33 AM
  #98  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Originally Posted by cjmatt
Have any of you flown out from Detroit Metro on a private jet vs. a commercial airliner?

A private flight you just walk onto, then take off, it takes about 1 hour to washington

A commercial flight takes about 5 hours when you factor in driving to the airport, check-in, boarding, flight instructions from attendants, the flight, landing, getting luggage, etc.

A private flight out of willow run takes you about 30 seconds to walk out from your car onto the plane and another 3 minutes to taxi and take off.

Mullaly makes 28 Million a year, or 6400/hr if he worked 12 hours a day/ 365 a year. by saving him 4 hours for meetings, he negated the cost of 8 hours of downtime sitting on a plane not trying to solve the crisis...8*6400 is 51,200, alot more than a 10k flight on a jet they already have paid off.

There you go-- confusing us with facts......................
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:41 AM
  #99  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by CLEAN
The plane and pilot are already paid for. You're probably looking at a burn of about 1000pph for the plane, for a 400 mile trip. Just for giggles, call it 4000 lbs round trip. at $4/gal for Jet A, you're talking about $2400 total for the round trip for the whole GM contingent. Figure half a dozen suits total=$400 per person, round trip. That's nothing. You'd be lucky to get a walkup fare on Southwest for that. If they had flown commercial, they would get skewered for pandering to DC while their paid for corporate jet sits unused at DTW.

The politicians were showboating and making a scene so they can get on the news and appear to be standing up against corporate greed to their constituants. It was the same thing when they put them all on the spot about their willingness to work for a dollar. I'd like to put the question to every member of congress as well.
I think what the senator wanted was for GM to get rid of the corporate jet. When you include operating costs (it's a lot more than just the fuel) and depreciation on the jet, it is more expensive.

Okay, what the senator really wanted was to make them squirm, 'cause it plays so well to the home audience.

I think we all knew this wasn't going to be pretty....

Like I said before, Wall Street is hard for people to wrap their brains around, but everyone has an opinion on the auto industry, and most of those think they can run it better than the folks who are there. Just look at the postings on this mostly-friendly website.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:53 AM
  #100  
yournamehere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 131
From: valley of hell
[Goodbye medical care. Goodbye pensions. Work until they don't need you, and then hurry up and die.[/QUOTE]



And there it is, the corporate view of the workforce And don't bitch or we'll move all manuf to some 3rd world sh#t hole even faster than we are.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:56 AM
  #101  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
There you go-- confusing us with facts......................
Not facts!!
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:04 AM
  #102  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
MMMMMMMMMMMM............have you looked at the board of directors of any other public company????

(.....but I WILL make sure you're on the next ballot.......'kay?......)
I was about to say the same thing.

If you look at the board of the country's media owners, you would notice a similar spread of influential people from major public companies.

Last edited by SSbaby; Nov 20, 2008 at 05:51 AM.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:51 AM
  #103  
Shockwave's Avatar
Lounge Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 357
From: Mi Scusi!
I agree wholeheartedly with Centric. I'm surprised that so many of you see this as "no big deal."

Originally Posted by JP95ZM6
You guys making professional wages, would you take a bus 10 miles to work at the expense of a half hour lost time every day, just to save a buck or 5 in gas? I sure wouldn't. Same thing, different numbers.
You're leaving a crucial element out of your hypothetical situation in order for it to work in your favor.

My transportation is not paid for by my job. The comparison of taking the bus to work for the hell of it is not valid at all. A better illustration would be,"If your company was going bankrupt, would you get off your *** and drive to work instead of taking the corporate limo every day?"

My contention is that anyone who is remotely connected with the real world and has a true interest in saving their organization will say,"yes" in a heartbeat. CEOS dropping in from private jets to ask for my money don't strike me as people willing to put in the hard work and the sacrifices to return to profitability.

They strike me as someone wanting an easy hand-out while they maintain their lavish lifestyles.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #104  
Blue89Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,413
From: Marlton NJ
Originally Posted by Shockwave
I agree wholeheartedly with Centric. I'm surprised that so many of you see this as "no big deal."



You're leaving a crucial element out of your hypothetical situation in order for it to work in your favor.

My transportation is not paid for by my job. The comparison of taking the bus to work for the hell of it is not valid at all. A better illustration would be,"If your company was going bankrupt, would you get off your *** and drive to work instead of taking the corporate limo every day?"

My contention is that anyone who is remotely connected with the real world and has a true interest in saving their organization will say,"yes" in a heartbeat. CEOS dropping in from private jets to ask for my money don't strike me as people willing to put in the hard work and the sacrifices to return to profitability.

They strike me as someone wanting an easy hand-out while they maintain their lavish lifestyles.
And what if you had to travel with 30 other people but your car only held 4? Would you rent 8 more cars at $60 a piece, or rent a limo for $250 that can hold everyone?
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 06:07 AM
  #105  
latinspice-94T/A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 197
From: Bayamon, PR
Unbelievable. People actually defend these jerkoffs. American CEO's are overpaid and their remunerations have nothing to do with performance. The Economist published an article on this last year I think, the difference in actual work performed and salary between European and American CEO's is huge, and yet American CEO's get ridiculous amounts of money to be a figurehead.

Someone mentioned their job, yes they may have some pressure, but their main job is to provide vision, direction, and promote company culture. It's obvious to the lawmakers at this point that these idiots really don't get it.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.