Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM top Exec. don't want to give up anything?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #61  
Purple 92 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 506
From: Columbia, SC
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yeah, this airplane thing is just a red herring.
granted, but with the media making that big of a deal of it because the senate and house did, And the population believing mostly whats reported on,means it'll be took as a prime example for those to tout as to not pass the loan legislation.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #62  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by cjmatt
Have any of you flown out from Detroit Metro on a private jet vs. a commercial airliner?

A private flight you just walk onto, then take off, it takes about 1 hour to washington

A commercial flight takes about 5 hours when you factor in driving to the airport, check-in, boarding, flight instructions from attendants, the flight, landing, getting luggage, etc.

A private flight out of willow run takes you about 30 seconds to walk out from your car onto the plane and another 3 minutes to taxi and take off.

Mullaly makes 28 Million a year, or 6400/hr if he worked 12 hours a day/ 365 a year. by saving him 4 hours for meetings, he negated the cost of 8 hours of downtime sitting on a plane not trying to solve the crisis...8*6400 is 51,200, alot more than a 10k flight on a jet they already have paid off.
Depending on your destination, flying from Detroit can seem to be a "you can't get there from here deal".
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #63  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Purple 92 SS
While i see your point, does anyone else here think that 28 million a year is a bit absurd for running a company?

It's kinda like paying a basketball player 15 million for 3 years of playing a sport that he loves. crazy. (yes i realize its capitalism)

So 8 hours, big deal, look at what the effect of it is though? negetive pr, the senate and house litterally calling them out about it, and hell if i can spend that much time in travelling why cant he?

sh|t, he puts his pants on the same way i do, one leg at a time. I dont see that the 8 hours being that much an issue with todays digital age of laptops, cell phones, blackberrys, trio's and what not. So what he has to go thru security, welcome to 90% of his employee's lives, and 90% of the worlds population when it comes to travel. He should be thankful he didnt have to drive. Furthermore, he may not have a job or the access to that private jet anyways if the company fails.

Yes, it may be "policy", yes he may get paid alot to do what he does, but yes, i've said it before and i'll say it again, appearance is everything, especially when you want something.
And Obama zips around now in black Suburbans... We are feasting on red herrings here...
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #64  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Does not compute. They just want to borrow some money, and they've not been able to get it anywhere else.
True enough Jake.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #65  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
These salaries are high but we have to look at them as free agent type pay for Nardelli and Mullaly as they had to be wooed with money to take a difficult job that even people like Bill Ford Jr. couldn't tackle. They already had top jobs at other corporations and thus wouldn't leave unless Chrysler and Ford made them a better deal.
Wagoner was with GM prior to being CEO and so his pay while high is in line with what a top level Fortune 500 CEO could expect to have after rising to the top from within.
They are the equivalent of making it to the pros.
And with any of these jobs the risk of being fired or removed sometimes from events outside of your control is always there. Remember that they have the most difficult job and have to work the hardest when times are tough. Not to mention that their decisions can save or burn billions and so that kind of decision making power and stress has to be compensated for.
I can't blame them for taking all they can while they can. If someone or some company offered anyone of us those dollars we would take them in a heartbeat.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #66  
centric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,022
From: Newhall, CA USA
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
I can't blame them for taking all they can while they can. If someone or some company offered anyone of us those dollars we would take them in a heartbeat.
I can. If they really cared about cars, if they really cared about the company, if they really believed in their ability, they'd work for free, and take their bonuses when the company rebounded.

Manager-led companies will be the death of US business. Get them out and get someone in who gives a crap.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #67  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
True enough Jake.
Thanks Paul. More people need to realize that.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #68  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally Posted by cjmatt
Have any of you flown out from Detroit Metro on a private jet vs. a commercial airliner?

A private flight you just walk onto, then take off, it takes about 1 hour to washington

A commercial flight takes about 5 hours when you factor in driving to the airport, check-in, boarding, flight instructions from attendants, the flight, landing, getting luggage, etc.

A private flight out of willow run takes you about 30 seconds to walk out from your car onto the plane and another 3 minutes to taxi and take off.

Mullaly makes 28 Million a year, or 6400/hr if he worked 12 hours a day/ 365 a year. by saving him 4 hours for meetings, he negated the cost of 8 hours of downtime sitting on a plane not trying to solve the crisis...8*6400 is 51,200, alot more than a 10k flight on a jet they already have paid off.
So Mullaly just wasted 3hrs or so on a plane flight that could have been spent in meetings and ironing out any details or problems that need to be addressed today. Just so a few pennies can be saved compared to the loss that the company is ensuing at a monthly rate? Anyone following? If you were a stock holder and this was a continual act, would you be mad? 10k, not even 50k, is going to matter when your lose BILLIONS per month. That would be like your job coming to you and telling you that you can't use the company car anymore because they need to cut back in these times because were losing millions per month.

On the media thing, they'll make a big flap about anything just for the sake of getting people to watch. If they really cared, they wouldn't care about this insignificant detail seeing as it has such a minimal impact on the larger problem that it would be laughed out of any board meeting, with stockholders there, if brought up as a way to help fix the hemorrhaging of money that is happening in Detroit.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #69  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by centric
I can. If they really cared about cars, if they really cared about the company, if they really believed in their ability, they'd work for free, and take their bonuses when the company rebounded.

Manager-led companies will be the death of US business. Get them out and get someone in who gives a crap.
That's an opinion you can certainly hold. That much we will agree on.

Working for free is not a part of my understanding of capitalism. It also isn't something I require from my american neighbors to prove to me they are well meaning, or much less, sincere.

If I have learned anything in my 57 years on this planet, it is that you should pay a days wage if you want that work done... and if you are getting paid a day's wage then be sure to deliver it or even a bit more.

Last edited by 1fastdog; Nov 19, 2008 at 05:02 PM.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #70  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by cjmatt
Have any of you flown out from Detroit Metro on a private jet vs. a commercial airliner?

A private flight you just walk onto, then take off, it takes about 1 hour to washington

A commercial flight takes about 5 hours when you factor in driving to the airport, check-in, boarding, flight instructions from attendants, the flight, landing, getting luggage, etc.

A private flight out of willow run takes you about 30 seconds to walk out from your car onto the plane and another 3 minutes to taxi and take off.

Mullaly makes 28 Million a year, or 6400/hr if he worked 12 hours a day/ 365 a year. by saving him 4 hours for meetings, he negated the cost of 8 hours of downtime sitting on a plane not trying to solve the crisis...8*6400 is 51,200, alot more than a 10k flight on a jet they already have paid off.
.....or they could just do a teleconference or an internet chat and save the trip and the time/money it takes to get there.

Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
These salaries are high but we have to look at them as free agent type pay for Nardelli and Mullaly as they had to be wooed with money to take a difficult job that even people like Bill Ford Jr. couldn't tackle. They already had top jobs at other corporations and thus wouldn't leave unless Chrysler and Ford made them a better deal.
Wagoner was with GM prior to being CEO and so his pay while high is in line with what a top level Fortune 500 CEO could expect to have after rising to the top from within.
They are the equivalent of making it to the pros.
And with any of these jobs the risk of being fired or removed sometimes from events outside of your control is always there. Remember that they have the most difficult job and have to work the hardest when times are tough. Not to mention that their decisions can save or burn billions and so that kind of decision making power and stress has to be compensated for.
I can't blame them for taking all they can while they can. If someone or some company offered anyone of us those dollars we would take them in a heartbeat.
This is why most of their pay should be incentive-based. In other words, you make $X base salary. If the company loses money, you get NO incentive pay. If the company makes a profit, you get incentive pay based on that profit. Getting paid 28 million bucks a year to run a company/corporation into the ground is rediculous.

Last edited by onebadponcho; Nov 19, 2008 at 05:04 PM.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #71  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by mastrdrver
So Mullaly just wasted 3hrs or so on a plane flight that could have been spent in meetings and ironing out any details or problems that need to be addressed today. Just so a few pennies can be saved compared to the loss that the company is ensuing at a monthly rate? Anyone following? If you were a stock holder and this was a continual act, would you be mad? 10k, not even 50k, is going to matter when your lose BILLIONS per month. That would be like your job coming to you and telling you that you can't use the company car anymore because they need to cut back in these times because were losing millions per month.

.

Mullaly was likely working non-stop on the corporate flight from Michigan to D.C..

The more riding on your shoulders, the more you try to make the most of your time. Having the privacy of a corporate flight ensures you can keep after corporate business, with some expectation of confidentiality.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #72  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
Mulally does not make $28 million a year.

The first year he got a "signing bonus" that was equal to the bonus that he LOST from Boeing, by leaving, and going to Ford. Plus, the majority is stock options.

He actually makes something like $2 million a year in salary.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #73  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by onebadponcho



This is why most of their pay should be incentive-based. In other words, you make $X base salary. If the company loses money, you get NO incentive pay. If the company makes a profit, you get incentive pay based on that profit. Getting paid 28 million bucks a year to run a company/corporation into the ground is rediculous.
Good point and they do get a lot incentives based upon a myriad of reasons. Mullaly doesn't get $28million for his base salary but from incentives, stocks and other bonuses.
One problem with this and we've seen it more now that the economy is down is that some of the incentives are not tied to the company's performance but to their own performance goals. So let's say Ford has a goal to cut production costs by 2% and Mullaly gets that goal then he gets some kind of incentive or bonus even if Ford as a whole is loosing money.
These CEO's have contracts written like pro athletes and with one like Mullaly has there are many incentives that he can reach to increase his pay many times over.

Here is a quick link I found on this subject.
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/04/m...lions-in-2007/

Last edited by 99SilverSS; Nov 19, 2008 at 05:53 PM.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #74  
LexLT1-Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254
From: Wilmington, De
Auto execs have some nerve

Talk about nerve by the auto exec's


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,454844,00.html
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #75  
jpolz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 300
From: Cleveland, OH
Missed it by that much......

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=650148



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.