Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

G8 GXP. $39,995, including $1700 gas guzzler tax.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #46  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Threxx
If performance and size were given a dollar value, what value would they be given?

Where would you rank the G8 in terms of interior design, features, quality, overall driving experience, dealer/service quality, etc? Point is there's more to cars than size and performance numbers and while I have not driven a G8 GXP I have driven a G8 GT and unless some sort of miracle was performed, the driving experience, chassis, interior, etc of a G8 GT is nothing remotely close to a 5 series, M5 or otherwise. Then again neither is the price. But this is why it's difficult to automatically call the G8 a bargain because you can put it along side a 5 series all day long and point out their sticker prices but the fact remains they're still very different cars.

Not so with the Genesis... go put it next to a Benz E class, Audi A6, Infiniti M or Lexus GS and you'll be hard pressed to find something in that car that doesn't remind you very much of one of those other cars that sell for far more.

That's the difference in selling a bargain priced car... it has to be pretty similar to the car you're comparing it to, and the G8 just isn't similar to the 5 series in any way aside from performance numbers and size.
I think comparing the G8 to the M5 is silly also, but comparing the G8 GT or G8 GXP to a more expensive run of the mill 5-series is very valid.

You BMW boys always crack me up (I have many BMW friends from 5 series owners, to M3's, to 7 series). All I ever hear you guys say is "oh the driving experience", "oh the feel", etc. It is soo funny. I swear you have all told each other this so many times that you have brainwashed yourselves that no other car can equal the "driving experience" of the BMW. In your defense, the magazines have been brainwashed as well and thus you are in a vicious cycle you are likely to never escape.

I don't think you are giving the G8 a fair shake compared to the 5 series (not the M5). It demolishes the 528i and 535i in terms of performance and competes with the 550i. Shoot, even the G8 GXP is significantly cheaper than the 528i. As for the interior and chassis, I personally think they are competitive. The BMW certainly has some more features (many that you dont really need) and I would give it the nod in interior (although their hard leather is not for everyone), but it also costs SIGNIFICANTLY more. Thus, if you don't need all the bells and whistles, yet still want a nice interior, ride quality, driving experience, and performance the G8 is a great option for $10 to $20k less dollars.

Oh, and this "driving experience" thing. Even if a 528i made me feel like I was Michael Shumaker everyday, I would still be driving a 230hp 4 door sedan and getting smoked by ricers and minivans. That would pretty much ruin my day.

Last edited by ZZtop; Dec 19, 2008 at 10:20 AM.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 10:39 AM
  #47  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 470
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by muckz
Not to mention that many of the people who **** and complain would not even buy it if it was $25,000.
I leased my GTO new and bought my Sky new. I for one feel the pricetag for the GXP is too much. Maybe I should say too much for me. If it were in the low to mid 30's (31-33k) I would consider it but this is just too much in my opinion.
Maybe if they have a $6k rebate like they did with the GTO eventually I will consider one (I did not get that rebate when I bought mine).
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #48  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by ZZtop
I think comparing the G8 to the M5 is silly also, but comparing the G8 GT or G8 GXP to a more expensive run of the mill 5-series is very valid.

You BMW boys always crack me up (I have many BMW friends from 5 series owners, to M3's, to 7 series). All I ever hear you guys say is "oh the driving experience", "oh the feel", etc. It is soo funny. I swear you have all told each other this so many times that you have brainwashed yourselves that no other car can equal the "driving experience" of the BMW. In your defense, the magazines have been brainwashed as well and thus you are in a vicious cycle you are likely to never escape.

I don't think you are giving the G8 a fair shake compared to the 5 series (not the M5). It demolishes the 528i and 535i in terms of performance and competes with the 550i. Shoot, even the G8 GXP is significantly cheaper than the 528i. As for the interior and chassis, I personally think they are competitive. The BMW certainly has some more features (many that you dont really need) and I would give it the nod in interior (although their hard leather is not for everyone), but it also costs SIGNIFICANTLY more. Thus, if you don't need all the bells and whistles, yet still want a nice interior, ride quality, driving experience, and performance the G8 is a great option for $10 to $20k less dollars.

Oh, and this "driving experience" thing. Even if a 528i made me feel like I was Michael Shumaker everyday, I would still be driving a 230hp 4 door sedan and getting smoked by ricers and minivans. That would pretty much ruin my day.
I think you're confusing me for a BMW fan boy. I'm not. I assure you I'm looking at this from a very unbiased perspective... I call things as I see them. In fact I'll be the first to tell you I consider BMW's cars to be over priced... especially their options. I also consider them to be in many ways poorly engineered.

But I'll also be the first to tell you that there's a dramatic difference in feel between driving a G8 GT and a 5-series. And no I'm not just talking about the connected driver/machine feel, I'm talking about NVH and general chassis response as well. They don't feel even remotely similar.

Obviously anyone buying the 528i doesn't give a damn about performance or just wants to be seen in a 5 series that didn't cost them any more than it had to.

IIRC the 535i, in terms of sheer performance, compares very well to G8 GT, and the G8 GXP is somewhere between the 550i and M5 in terms of performance, although with BMW's new twin turbo V8 replacement for the N/A V8 currently in the 550i coming out in 6-8 months... it will likely make the comparison closer between the G8 GXP and whatever they're going to call the 550i replacement.

However all of those performance comparisons aside, the price difference and driving experience are still not remotely close, for better or for worse. Which brings me back to my original point that it's extremely difficult to put these two cars side by side and pretend like it's an apples to apples comparison. It's just not.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #49  
transam8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
From: Butler, PA
Originally Posted by ZZtop
I think comparing the G8 to the M5 is silly also, but comparing the G8 GT or G8 GXP to a more expensive run of the mill 5-series is very valid.

I don't think you are giving the G8 a fair shake compared to the 5 series (not the M5). It demolishes the 528i and 535i in terms of performance and competes with the 550i. Shoot, even the G8 GXP is significantly cheaper than the 528i. As for the interior and chassis, I personally think they are competitive. The BMW certainly has some more features (many that you dont really need) and I would give it the nod in interior (although their hard leather is not for everyone), but it also costs SIGNIFICANTLY more. Thus, if you don't need all the bells and whistles, yet still want a nice interior, ride quality, driving experience, and performance the G8 is a great option for $10 to $20k less dollars.
That in a nutshell covers what the G8 is about IMO.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #50  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Threxx
I think you're confusing me for a BMW fan boy. I'm not. I assure you I'm looking at this from a very unbiased perspective... I call things as I see them. In fact I'll be the first to tell you I consider BMW's cars to be over priced... especially their options. I also consider them to be in many ways poorly engineered.
I have toured the BMW plant in Greer, SC (behind the scenes) and worked on BMW projects in school for the paint process (door brake). I actually consider the cars to be VERY well engineered. I think their downfall is that they are over-engineered and honestly, have too tight of tolerances (yes there is such a thing). This is why it takes so much and costs so much to keep them running in tip top shape.

Originally Posted by Threxx
But I'll also be the first to tell you that there's a dramatic difference in feel between driving a G8 GT and a 5-series. And no I'm not just talking about the connected driver/machine feel, I'm talking about NVH and general chassis response as well. They don't feel even remotely similar.
I can maybe see the NVH, but I wouldn't call it dramatic. As for the chassis response, the G8 chassis is praised seven ways from Sunday for comfort and response. Can you be more specific about the differences you noticed?

Originally Posted by Threxx
However all of those performance comparisons aside, the price difference and driving experience are still not remotely close, for better or for worse. Which brings me back to my original point that it's extremely difficult to put these two cars side by side and pretend like it's an apples to apples comparison. It's just not.
I agree it is difficult to compare them due to the huge price difference and partly the vehicles. I also think the ingrained perception of BMW makes it difficult for one to allow themselves to failry compare it to a "lesser" priced vehicle. For example. If the G8 had a MB grill and was called the E600, I think the reviews in comparison to the 5 series would be more favorable.

It is hard to change perception. Just ask GM and Ford!
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #51  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Threxx
If performance and size were given a dollar value, what value would they be given?

Where would you rank the G8 in terms of interior design, features, quality, overall driving experience, dealer/service quality, etc? Point is there's more to cars than size and performance numbers and while I have not driven a G8 GXP I have driven a G8 GT and unless some sort of miracle was performed, the driving experience, chassis, interior, etc of a G8 GT is nothing remotely close to a 5 series, M5 or otherwise. Then again neither is the price. But this is why it's difficult to automatically call the G8 a bargain because you can put it along side a 5 series all day long and point out their sticker prices but the fact remains they're still very different cars.

.
I agree completely. The G8 GT is a fine car. But the 5 series is in a completely different league.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #52  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
Only the 3-Series sells more cars in its class. And where I live, it's only FWD or AWD given the ice we get. Pontiac only wishes that its G8 interior was half as good as the TLs. I spend my time on the inside of the car, not looking at it from a distance.

Acura TL Type-S
0-60: 5.5
1/4 mile: 14.1

G8 GT
0-60: 5.3
1/4 mile: 13.8

I'm not going to necessarily notice that .2-.3 difference in everyday driving, but I will notice the glaring difference between the interiors and MPG.

The main point is that everyone has their turn-ons and turn-offs. You want a nice interior and nav. Someone else will want RWD and a big V8. Someone else will want that BMW feel. I've owned BMWs, Mercedes, and a couple of Z28 Camaros. The BMW and Mercedes are very nice, but the Camaro is fine for what I want. I don't care about nav, and I want a functional interior, but I don't need luxury. I liked the way the Camaro took a lot less out of my bank account.

Re: G8 GXP, I don't think GM expects it will sell more than a few thousand, so obviously, the appeal is more limited than that of an Acura TL. But that doesn't mean the GXP isn't a great car.
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #53  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
Only the 3-Series sells more cars in its class. And where I live, it's only FWD or AWD given the ice we get. Pontiac only wishes that its G8 interior was half as good as the TLs. I spend my time on the inside of the car, not looking at it from a distance.

Acura TL Type-S
0-60: 5.5
1/4 mile: 14.1

G8 GT
0-60: 5.3
1/4 mile: 13.8

I'm not going to necessarily notice that .2-.3 difference in everyday driving, but I will notice the glaring difference between the interiors and MPG.
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
Now I prefer RWD to FWD myself, but who knows ultimately . . . I may decide on a RWD car next given the prices of AWD systems. The AWD vs RWD issue wasn't enough to overcome the other differences between the vehicle.

Better interior: Acura
Better features: Acura
Better MPG: Acura
Better residual: Acura
Better dealer service: Acura

. . . and those are categories that the Acura walks the GT.

The $2k in difference, scant performance benefit and RWD weren't enough to overcome the Acura. That's not to say I'm totally happy with the Acura, but at the time, it was the right decision for me.
The $2k difference is in the GT vs the base TL, but the TL Type-S is about $6.5k more. I have been in the G8, and the interior is very nice. I haven't been in new TL's, but a guy at works as an 05 or 06. It is a nice interior, but I wouldn't say twice as good as the G8's.


Still, the G8 needs to have SAT Traffic and NAV.
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #54  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by Plague
The $2k difference is in the GT vs the base TL, but the TL Type-S is about $6.5k more. I have been in the G8, and the interior is very nice. I haven't been in new TL's, but a guy at works as an 05 or 06. It is a nice interior, but I wouldn't say twice as good as the G8's.


Still, the G8 needs to have SAT Traffic and NAV.
Nope. That's what the going price was for the Type-S. I paid $2k more for the Type-S than what the Pontiac dealership was offering for the GT. I probably could have gotten a base TL for $28k-29k.
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #55  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
Nope. That's what the going price was for the Type-S. I paid $2k more for the Type-S than what the Pontiac dealership was offering for the GT. I probably could have gotten a base TL for $28k-29k.
Don't compare MSRP and retail transaction prices. The only fair thing to compare is MSRP.
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #56  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Don't compare MSRP and retail transaction prices. The only fair thing to compare is MSRP.
I don't even know how that's really "fair." Very few cars go for actual MSRP. I mean, if you pay MSRP for an Impala, you're a complete idiot, if you catch my drift. I mean seriously, when was the last time that anyone actually paid close to MSRP for a G6 or something? Considering we're talking about value, then the going market rate plays much more into that than this imaginary thing called MSRP.
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #57  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
I don't even know how that's really "fair." Very few cars go for actual MSRP. I mean, if you pay MSRP for an Impala, you're a complete idiot, if you catch my drift. I mean seriously, when was the last time that anyone actually paid close to MSRP for a G6 or something? Considering we're talking about value, then the going market rate plays much more into that than this imaginary thing called MSRP.
Well if the actual retail pricing varies so much then it is impossible to compare prices at all.
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #58  
FerrMaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 211
From: Santa Clarita,CA
Originally Posted by Threxx
I think you're confusing me for a BMW fan boy. I'm not. I assure you I'm looking at this from a very unbiased perspective... I call things as I see them. In fact I'll be the first to tell you I consider BMW's cars to be over priced... especially their options. I also consider them to be in many ways poorly engineered.
Has something on your fuel system taken a dump yet? If it hasn't yet, it will soon. Whether it be fault codes from the high pressure pump/injectors to carbon build up in the intake, these N54 engines are like race-bred ones with all the down falls of them as well...tire-roastingly fast but fragile...

Edit: BTW, I love the M6 E60 550i with M-sport package, as I've referenced it in other posts. However, @ 40k I would take the GXP all day long. Just as much fun as the Bimmer minus about half the price / rubbery shifter / OPEN DIFF?!

Last edited by FerrMaro; Dec 21, 2008 at 12:55 PM.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #59  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Threxx
If performance and size were given a dollar value, what value would they be given?
Well, performance and size are not exactly got-it/don't-got-it criteria. There are lots of different sizes and levels of performance.

Size
In general, the larger a car, the more expensive it will be. There are these gray lines drawn throughout the market that divide it into "classes", in which a 5-series would generally be classified as a midsize luxury sport sedan. A G8 is definitely a midsize sedan, but is clearly not luxury. I think that the GT and GXP definitely qualify for the "sport" moniker, and having driven a V6, I'd be tempted to assign it there too.

So, take a 535i, subtract some luxury, add some performance (I'll get to that in a minute), lop ten grand off the sticker price, and yeah, I'd say you have a good value.

Performance
Just for reference, the best-performing car that I have any significant seat time in is my Camaro. (I've driven a couple cars that are slightly faster on the drag strip and a third gen with a 400rwph and a road course suspension, but just once or twice each). The best-riding car that I have any significant seat time in is a 2006 Impala LTZ. I have no delusions about there being faster, better-handling or better-riding cars out there, but just so you know what my baselines are.

I don't think there are going to be any arguments about straight line acceleration. Despite a ~10% weight disadvantage, the G8 GXP is going to hand a 535i its *** in a straight line.

My impression of the G8 V6 I drove was that it rode slightly more smoothly than the Impala (on different roads, so YMMV), while at the same time taking corners with less body roll and providing more road feedback. It's worlds better than the Impala, not to mention all of the other vehicles I've driven (which, admittedly, does not include any BMWs).

Originally Posted by Threxx
Where would you rank the G8 in terms of interior design, features, quality, overall driving experience, dealer/service quality, etc?
  • While not groundbreaking, the G8's interior design is both functional and pleasing to my eye. Ergonomics were fine. The seat was comfortable and I had no issues adjusting it to my liking.
  • Features -- everything I expect, nothing I don't. Cooled seats would have been nice; I don't think it has that.
  • It's hard to comment on quality without owning one, but a quick perusal of the results of some Google searches indicate that there are a normal number of TSBs and no recalls. I haven't been looking for them, but I haven't heard about any quality nightmares on G8s, or on Holden cars in general.
  • My personal opinion was that the G8's overall driving experience was excellent. This is supported by the opinions of magazine writers who have driven everything from the Tata Nano to the Bugatti Veyron.
  • My experience with the service departments at the four different Pontiac dealers I've visited has been that the personnel are intelligent, helpful, and courteous. I've actually sent vehicles in for service to two of those dealers, and my experiences were excellent. On one occasion, they were only going to take 20-30 minutes to do the work, and I was offered coffee and donuts while I waited (donuts were tasty; didn't try the coffee). On the other occasion, the car was being left there overnight, and they offered me a free loaner car for the day (I didn't need it, and so declined).

I'm sure that, as a Chevy/Pontiac/Buick owner, my standards are different than those of a Toyota/Lexus/BMW owner. However, the G8 is a fine vehicle.

Bottom line: I think that the G8 GT is a lot of car for not a lot of money. The GXP is a nice upgrade, and still a nice value, but I don't think it matches the GT's bang for the buck. A 5-series, on the other hand, is a lot of car for a lot of money.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #60  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
286hp & 256tq. Yeah, the torque steer is something. But you don't have to push it to really move at all. Although I will admit, it is a sweet sounding engine in the higher RPMs.

Just curious, does it have a limited slip differential? Or equal half-shafts? I think that Neon SRT-4 had equal half-shafts to reduce torque steer.

No doubt it accelerates VERY well, I actually liked the TL for quite a while, not crazy about the current one, but I'm sure it's a really nice car. I am just pointing out there is always a difference between a V8 and a V6, no matter how powerful the V6 is. The low-end torque of the V8 is only approached by a turbo 6.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.