Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

G8 GXP. $39,995, including $1700 gas guzzler tax.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 05:35 AM
  #31  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
I cross shopped the G8 GT, Acura TL Type-S and Infiniti M35 Sport. Now there was about a $10k spread in the vehicles (MSRP), but they're all of similar size. Hell, I had a deposit sitting on the GT for months before I pulled my money out after test driving it.

Yeah, it was quick and big. And yes, it was definitely the best interior I had ever seen in a Pontiac. But it wasn't close to the Acura or the Infiniti. It was just a few ticks faster than both.

However, I was still looking at about $31k for the GT out the door, about $38k for the Infiniti and about $33.5k for the Acura. Now I may have very well gone for the GT had it more features. No XM and no SatNav at the time. What gets me now, is that even for $40k, the GXP is still lacking features. I challenge anyone to find another performance sedan for $40k that doesn't at least have SatNav as an option. If you're talking $40k for a car, it had better have some options available for it. It takes more than a big motor in an average sedan for me to pony up that kind of cash. And don't even get me started on the residual value issue.

Now see, I feel that way about FWD. No way do I pay over $30K for a FWD, especially when it's a rehashed Accord.

The Acura TL is a failure, as I have declared it so.

Don't get me started on Audis.

Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:19 AM
  #32  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by teal98
Now see, I feel that way about FWD. No way do I pay over $30K for a FWD, especially when it's a rehashed Accord.

The Acura TL is a failure, as I have declared it so.

Don't get me started on Audis.

Only the 3-Series sells more cars in its class. And where I live, it's only FWD or AWD given the ice we get. Pontiac only wishes that its G8 interior was half as good as the TLs. I spend my time on the inside of the car, not looking at it from a distance.

Acura TL Type-S
0-60: 5.5
1/4 mile: 14.1

G8 GT
0-60: 5.3
1/4 mile: 13.8

I'm not going to necessarily notice that .2-.3 difference in everyday driving, but I will notice the glaring difference between the interiors and MPG.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #33  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by teal98
Now see, I feel that way about FWD. No way do I pay over $30K for a FWD, especially when it's a rehashed Accord.

The Acura TL is a failure, as I have declared it so.

Don't get me started on Audis.

FWD would also keep me from that car.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:41 AM
  #34  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by Z28x
FWD would also keep me from that car.
Now I prefer RWD to FWD myself, but who knows ultimately . . . I may decide on a RWD car next given the prices of AWD systems. The AWD vs RWD issue wasn't enough to overcome the other differences between the vehicle.

Better interior: Acura
Better features: Acura
Better MPG: Acura
Better residual: Acura
Better dealer service: Acura

. . . and those are categories that the Acura walks the GT.

The $2k in difference, scant performance benefit and RWD weren't enough to overcome the Acura. That's not to say I'm totally happy with the Acura, but at the time, it was the right decision for me.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #35  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
I'd kill to swap a G8 GXP for our Impala.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:02 AM
  #36  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by Aaron91RS
No that will be the "firehawk" and god only knows how much it will cost but if this thing is adding $900 for a fricking sunroof a supercharger will surely push it up another $10,000
Are you complaining about the $900 sunroof option? Maybe in the US they're cheaper, but whenever I price out a car and add a sunroof, it always adds between $800 and $1100 to the price.

Keep in mind that it's not just the supercharger - it's also the suspension, brakes, wheels, tires. It definitely doesn't cost them THAT much more, but it's all about how many units they want to sell.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:05 AM
  #37  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by Plague
i r reading failure!!!
lol
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #38  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Sh*t sometimes I get so annoyed by cheap @ss car enthusiasts who want everything in the world for $10,000 and yet don't understand why GM can't make a profit.
Not to mention that many of the people who **** and complain would not even buy it if it was $25,000.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #39  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by muckz
Not to mention that many of the people who **** and complain would not even buy it if it was $25,000.
Good to see I am not alone.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #40  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by cmg06s
it means how many Pontiac fans do you know with 40k lying around.
And I don't think this attracts Pontiac fans. I spot G8s in neighbourhoods where people drive Jaguars, BMWs, Benzs, Audis, Cadillacs... There are other cars there too, that are not so glamorous, but the point is, this car pops in neighbourhoods that are rather well off. They wont' look twice at G3 or G5, but this car is catchy.

One could get an Audi A4 3.2 Quattro or this Pontiac G8 GXP for the same price.

Not to mention that regular V6 G8 is significantly cheaper than the A4 2.0T Quattro, and the GT G8 is on par with (sigh, again) turbo 4-cylinder quattro audi a4.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #41  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Plague
i r reading failure!!!
WTF, did you actually edit the case on my screen name in the quote before you posted?

Originally Posted by cmg06s
it means how many Pontiac fans do you know with 40k lying around.
In 2002, a Trans Am convertible sold for 32k.

Add the WS6 package ($3290) and you're at 35k. They sold, and that was nowhere near the car the G8 is.

Add in the $4100 Collectors Edition package (only 2000 made) and you're staring 40k right in the face. Those all sold too.

I haven't even taken into account the a-la-carte options like traction control.

40k simply isn't much of a jump at all for a performance Pontiac. If you take inflation into account (and why wouldn't you?), the G8 GXP is actually not the most expensive Pontiac ever sold.

Originally Posted by Threxx
Did you see what happened to VW when they released the 70k dollar Phaeton?
I don't think the Phaeton was worth 70k.

I really don't think anyone out there is doubting that the G8 GXP is worth the price. 5-series size, 3-series price, and one hell of a performance package -- that's a steal at 40k.

I also think the Phaeton was marketed toward an entirely different set of buyers than the G8 GXP will be. Therefore, I don't think it's a valid comparison.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #42  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by teal98
Now see, I feel that way about FWD. No way do I pay over $30K for a FWD, especially when it's a rehashed Accord.

The Acura TL is a failure, as I have declared it so.

Don't get me started on Audis.

Actually, the only FWD car I see myself EVER owning is an economy car, a grocery getter, a commuter. Thus the Mazda3 we have. I don't ever see myself buying such a car brand new. With taxes and some options to pay $25 CDN for it is a complete waste of my money.

I could get a 2 year old Audi A6 for that money, and that's with Quattro. Yes I love Audis, yes they're problematic cars, etc, etc... But you get the picture.

If I was to buy a BRAND NEW car, it would have to be something I would keep for a long time. And that means either AWD or RWD.

I still don't see sense in buying brand new though.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #43  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by Dan Daly
I'm not going to necessarily notice that .2-.3 difference in everyday driving, but I will notice the glaring difference between the interiors and MPG.

Actually, you will notice A LOT of difference. You need to push the V6 harder to get similar acceleration of V8. The low-end torque of the V8 is a pleasure to drive in the city, where it accelerates quickly and quietly right off idle.

Torque steer in the Acura?
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #44  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
really don't think anyone out there is doubting that the G8 GXP is worth the price. 5-series size, 3-series price, and one hell of a performance package -- that's a steal at 40k.
If performance and size were given a dollar value, what value would they be given?

Where would you rank the G8 in terms of interior design, features, quality, overall driving experience, dealer/service quality, etc? Point is there's more to cars than size and performance numbers and while I have not driven a G8 GXP I have driven a G8 GT and unless some sort of miracle was performed, the driving experience, chassis, interior, etc of a G8 GT is nothing remotely close to a 5 series, M5 or otherwise. Then again neither is the price. But this is why it's difficult to automatically call the G8 a bargain because you can put it along side a 5 series all day long and point out their sticker prices but the fact remains they're still very different cars.

Not so with the Genesis... go put it next to a Benz E class, Audi A6, Infiniti M or Lexus GS and you'll be hard pressed to find something in that car that doesn't remind you very much of one of those other cars that sell for far more.

That's the difference in selling a bargain priced car... it has to be pretty similar to the car you're comparing it to, and the G8 just isn't similar to the 5 series in any way aside from performance numbers and size.
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #45  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by muckz
Actually, you will notice A LOT of difference. You need to push the V6 harder to get similar acceleration of V8. The low-end torque of the V8 is a pleasure to drive in the city, where it accelerates quickly and quietly right off idle.

Torque steer in the Acura?
286hp & 256tq. Yeah, the torque steer is something. But you don't have to push it to really move at all. Although I will admit, it is a sweet sounding engine in the higher RPMs.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.