Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

First OFFICIAL pictures of 2004 GTO

Old Jun 24, 2002 | 11:23 AM
  #106  
GOATCRAZY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 124
From: Milwaukee, WI
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by HuJass:
GOATCRAZY,
RE: your disagreements about my comments about Pontiac engines: This looks like a good place & time.
...I know what they're capable of and what their downfalls are. I still think it's a great engine with one caveat: for a by-gone era. They do not stack up to a modern engine in any way, shape, or form. Sure you can get the same power (and more) from them then, say, the LS1.
</font>
My point of disagreement was not to argue whether or not the '69 Pontiac 400 is a better engine than the '96 350...That would be LUDICROUS! There's ~30 + years of development in between! My point of contention was FOR THE ERA, the pontiac 400 was an excellent engine compared to the chevy or others. There's no way that one could compare the two. It just happens that Chevy was the more popular powertrain, so it was chosen to be the "corporate" boilerplate for future designs.

I'll state again, I'm not one of those guys with their heads in the sand like ostriches ignoring the world around them...

I just refuse to settle for anything but the best when it comes to Pontiac!



------------------
'69 GTO 400 H.O. 350 HP
'96 Bonneville 231 S.D.
'96 Sunfire 2.4L H.O.
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 12:06 PM
  #107  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 305fan:
BMW's look good- no one would call them beautiful or sexy though-
but they are a true high performnace car with
a rep Pontiac would kill for</font>
say what? i will appreciate you not speaking for me in the future. i absolutely love the current 3 series BMW styling and find it extremely sexy. more sexy than any modern ferrari for sure and one of the top 10 most sexiest cars made today. PERIOD.
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 03:25 AM
  #108  
AussieGTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Post

A word from downunder. I have been a fan of American Muscle for years, as long as I have know about the existance of F-bodies I have wanted one and have now for some years. I felt for everyone in America, myself and every other F-body owner in the world when GM decided to kill them. I felt sorry for everyone over there when it looked like you had no replacement, unlike us here with a very healthy V8 market.

I have read most of these post and have come to a couple of conclusions. A. Most if any have not been lucky to see this car parked infront of them, or B, are just to picky for your own good.

What GM have offered you is a real size RWD V8 with a heap of power a back seat and trunk. Making it as practical as it is powerful. Not to mention all the spares and support you need for a car.

The idea that it looks like a Grand prix, well wait until you see them parked side by side before you make that opinion. You are taking about a car that is bigger then the original GTO.

The car is not that overpriced, not much more than a brand new Trans AM. Try buying one here for less than $70,000 Aus. At least they are in the market there for a reasonable price.

If you want it to look tuff then do it, companies like SLP are already doing the work for you.

The idea that calling it a GTO is some sought of crime and they have not followed the ideals of the "GTO" legend is rediculous. Where have they gone wrong. Pontiac trade mark front end with the split grill, RWD, V8, excellant handling package, from GM anyway, 4 spot front brakes with 12" rotors, duel spot backend, so you have some way to stop the freight train.

Given that GM where going to leave you with nothing I think you have done pretty well, don't you.

I don't mean to sound offencive by this, but there seems to be a lot of misconception about the sought of car you are getting.
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 05:10 AM
  #109  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Post

Chevrolet engines and stuff are IT, thats all I'm saying. For now anyway.

Is the GTO a GTO mechanically?? Yes. Is the GTO a GTO in looks?? No. We want both. Its not too much to ask, I mean they didn't have to make it look like the others. Where is the creativity in the design?? And we know they need that. Maybe you guys need to take another look at it or keep looking until you see.

[This message has been edited by IZ28 (edited June 25, 2002).]
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 07:32 AM
  #110  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by morb|d:
say what? i will appreciate you not speaking for me in the future. i absolutely love the current 3 series BMW styling and find it extremely sexy. more sexy than any modern ferrari for sure and one of the top 10 most sexiest cars made today. PERIOD.</font>
You feel a 3 series BMW is more sxy looking than a 360 Modena or 575M Maranello. Yea the new 3 series are very very nice and the M3 is a killer car but compared to a Ferrari... BMW styling is kinda concervative twin round headlights in a swept headlight lens, 2 kidney bean grills, a rounded block style bumber and a large horizonatal opening in the lower front faschia accented by foglights at either end. That style has been around for a very long time. Not a flame I just found this comment interesting.
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 09:11 AM
  #111  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by AussieGTA:
A word from downunder. I have been a fan of American Muscle for years, as long as I have know about the existance of F-bodies I have wanted one and have now for some years. I felt for everyone in America, myself and every other F-body owner in the world when GM decided to kill them. I felt sorry for everyone over there when it looked like you had no replacement, unlike us here with a very healthy V8 market.

I have read most of these post and have come to a couple of conclusions. A. Most if any have not been lucky to see this car parked infront of them, or B, are just to picky for your own good.

What GM have offered you is a real size RWD V8 with a heap of power a back seat and trunk. Making it as practical as it is powerful. Not to mention all the spares and support you need for a car.

The idea that it looks like a Grand prix, well wait until you see them parked side by side before you make that opinion. You are taking about a car that is bigger then the original GTO.

The car is not that overpriced, not much more than a brand new Trans AM. Try buying one here for less than $70,000 Aus. At least they are in the market there for a reasonable price.

If you want it to look tuff then do it, companies like SLP are already doing the work for you.

The idea that calling it a GTO is some sought of crime and they have not followed the ideals of the "GTO" legend is rediculous. Where have they gone wrong. Pontiac trade mark front end with the split grill, RWD, V8, excellant handling package, from GM anyway, 4 spot front brakes with 12" rotors, duel spot backend, so you have some way to stop the freight train.

Given that GM where going to leave you with nothing I think you have done pretty well, don't you.

I don't mean to sound offencive by this, but there seems to be a lot of misconception about the sought of car you are getting.
</font>

AHH this man knows what he is talking about!
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 12:28 PM
  #112  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 99SilverSS:
You feel a 3 series BMW is more sxy looking than a 360 Modena or 575M Maranello. Yea the new 3 series are very very nice and the M3 is a killer car but compared to a Ferrari... BMW styling is kinda concervative twin round headlights in a swept headlight lens, 2 kidney bean grills, a rounded block style bumber and a large horizonatal opening in the lower front faschia accented by foglights at either end. That style has been around for a very long time. Not a flame I just found this comment interesting.</font>
the theme has been around forever, yes. the current styling is pretty current however. and I'm not even talking about the M3 although its one inclreadible machine. the 360 and the 550/575M are probabobly more conservative than the bimmer considering they ARE ferrari and that has been many people's gripes with them (if you can call those "gripes"). Don't get me wrong, I like the clean lines of those two much more than farrari of the 80s and place them within the same top 10.

my original comment was to tell you to not assume that your own tastes completely conisided with everyone elses. that is all.
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 12:41 PM
  #113  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Thumbs up

also, aussies are funny. correct. but funny.
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 09:17 PM
  #114  
johnmon94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13
From: rolla,mo. usa
Post

I think it is great that GM is at least making something new that has performance like a F-body it's a whole lot better than a front wheel drive p.o.s. something that you can buy off the show room floor and stomp rustangs!

BRING BACK THE F-BODY
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 09:47 PM
  #115  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by AussieGTA:
A word from downunder. I have been a fan of American Muscle for years, as long as I have know about the existance of F-bodies I have wanted one and have now for some years. I felt for everyone in America, myself and every other F-body owner in the world when GM decided to kill them. I felt sorry for everyone over there when it looked like you had no replacement, unlike us here with a very healthy V8 market.

I have read most of these post and have come to a couple of conclusions. A. Most if any have not been lucky to see this car parked infront of them, or B, are just to picky for your own good.

What GM have offered you is a real size RWD V8 with a heap of power a back seat and trunk. Making it as practical as it is powerful. Not to mention all the spares and support you need for a car.

The idea that it looks like a Grand prix, well wait until you see them parked side by side before you make that opinion. You are taking about a car that is bigger then the original GTO.

The car is not that overpriced, not much more than a brand new Trans AM. Try buying one here for less than $70,000 Aus. At least they are in the market there for a reasonable price.

If you want it to look tuff then do it, companies like SLP are already doing the work for you.

The idea that calling it a GTO is some sought of crime and they have not followed the ideals of the "GTO" legend is rediculous. Where have they gone wrong. Pontiac trade mark front end with the split grill, RWD, V8, excellant handling package, from GM anyway, 4 spot front brakes with 12" rotors, duel spot backend, so you have some way to stop the freight train.

Given that GM where going to leave you with nothing I think you have done pretty well, don't you.

I don't mean to sound offencive by this, but there seems to be a lot of misconception about the sought of car you are getting.
</font>
Welcome to the board AussieGTA, & don't worry about being offensive. We talk like this all the time.
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 11:48 PM
  #116  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by guionM:
Welcome to the board AussieGTA, & don't worry about being offensive. We talk like this all the time. </font>
we do? i don't think we're THAT civilized.

[This message has been edited by morb|d (edited June 26, 2002).]
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:52 AM
  #117  
AussieGTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Post

thanks for the welcome, just don't like to offend on the first post, doesn't make for good conversations later. From then on its open, lol
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 02:07 AM
  #118  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Post

Sure we are glad we are getting a car like this from GM, we just want a GTO not a 360HP Grand Am/Prix.
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 03:21 AM
  #119  
stevil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 295
From: Columbus, Ohio
Post

It looks great, I want one.

Any of this added crap is just going to make the car more expensive, which I don't want. I plan on buying one, instead of an LS1 F-body.

As far as looking like a GTO, it does! Does it sort of look like a Grand Prix? A little bit, but thats not a bad thing. We haven't had muscle cars for awhile, and the term sleeper seems lost these days. I'm 23, and I'm ready for a nice coupe like this, it looks nice.

What I'm worried about is price and performance. I looked at the pic, it looks good, and thats that. GM could have ruined the Monaro and made some hideous car! We're lucky.

Also keep in mind that we begged for this car, and now we're getting it. I can't believe how many schmucks complain, and are only concerned with the looks of the car.

Sometimes, less is more.

------------------
FormulaV8.com · 1994 Formula · A4 · 3.23
13.45 @ 102.5 MPH w/ 1.9 60' | 267 rwhp | 307 tq/lbs | 3535 lbs
"I know for a fact he is NOT an Easter bunny"
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 11:46 AM
  #120  
GOATCRAZY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 124
From: Milwaukee, WI
Talking

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by IZ28:
Sure we are glad we are getting a car like this from GM, we just want a GTO not a 360HP Grand Am/Prix.</font>
Exactly! I don't know if I'm reading the pulse of the posts correctly, but I get the feeling that GM has driven people to the point of despiration so that they will accept ANYTHING remotely V-8 RWD performance oriented!
I truly believe that the overall mood would be totally different if this happened in '96 when the F-body was in full swing, the corvette was also, and the Impala SS (the real one) was on the streets.

It appears to me that people are acting like little desparate teenagers that are just happy to play hide the salami with anything with two legs!

What a number of people are saying is: raise the standards bar! And accept NOTHING less than excellence! Don't let the current situation change your level of integrity. Like I've said before: if you look at the car WITHOUT badges and say "That's a GTO" then it's a GTO. If not, then it ain't. And we should accept nothing less than the best. Especially not a hurry-up, slapped-together sham of a car that they are proposing.

The ending comments of the gent from Australia put it well: You should be GLAD to be getting a car like this given your current situation.

WRONG! We should let these pieces of **** ROT on the dealer's lots and buy all the mauraders, thunderbirds, and ford '49's we can get our hands on and give GM the BIRD!

Maybe then they might get the picture, but if we coddle them along with constant sales then they think everything's OK. We need to send a message. A strong one.



------------------
'69 GTO 400 H.O. 350 HP
'96 Bonneville 231 S.D.
'96 Sunfire 2.4L H.O.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.