Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

BMW confirms four-cylinder engine for the U.S. market

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2009, 10:45 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
95redLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,505
BMW confirms four-cylinder engine for the U.S. market

http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-conf...-s-market.html
Thanks to more stringent CAFE regulations just over the horizon, BMW will once again offer a four-cylinder engine in the U.S. market. Rumors of a four-pot BMW first surfaced earlier this year, but a BMW engineer has confirmed the more fuel-efficient engine is U.S.-bound.

BMW hasn’t offered a four-cylinder model in the United States since 1999, but the German automaker will bring back the smaller engine as it brings its lineup up to spec with looming emission regulations.

However, the move to four-cylinders won’t be easy as a simple engine swap. BMW has built a reputation for producing performance vehicles, and the automaker doesn’t want to erase that in the name of better mileage. “The biggest challenge will be maintaining the ‘Ultimate Driving Machine’ performance,” Tom Baloga, BMW’s vice president of engineering for the U.S., told Bloomberg.

Although about 50 percent of BMW’s global sales are made up of four-cylinder vehicles, Americans have come to associate BMW’s with powerful models. However, BMW will have to find a way to balance performance and fuel economy as it raises its fleet wide average from 26.5 mpg to 35.5 mpg by 2016.

Diesels promise to also factory heavily into BMW’s CAFE plans, including four-cylinder oil burners. BMW’s most fuel efficient model – the 116d – uses a four-cylinder diesel capable of returning better than 53 mpg. In fact, Baloga says BMW’s European offering could meet the 2016 CAFE regulations, thanks to a 67 percent take rate on diesel engines.

Despite the confirmation, Baloga failed to mention which BMW models are earmarked for a four-cylinder. However, the 1- and 3-Series seem like a safe bet, with an entry-level 5-Series model not completely out of the question.
95redLT1 is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 11:18 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,338
Audi's 2.0t should be BMW's benchmark to beat for driving pleasure and economy... the 2.0t is amazingly capable in both categories as I can personally attest to from having owned an 06 A4. It was quick, felt even quicker than it actually was, very responsive, and ridiculously good fuel economy considering how I drove it (~29-31 in the city, ~36-40 highway were my real world numbers, consistently)
Threxx is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 12:58 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Smart move if gas goes back over $3. 1 & 3 series are not very efficient for their size and weight with that 230HP 3.0L engine. Camaro gets 1mpg more while being 500lbs. heavier and having 75more HP than a 128i.
Z28x is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 01:07 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,338
Originally Posted by Z28x
Smart move if gas goes back over $3. 1 & 3 series are not very efficient for their size and weight with that 230HP 3.0L engine. Camaro gets 1mpg more while being 500lbs. heavier and having 75more HP than a 128i.
I've found my 335i to be very reasonable in real world mileage despite its EPA rating. I routinely average 22.5-23.5 in heavy-footed city driving and 30-31 doing 75-80 mph with the AC on during long road trips. That's with a 6-speed automatic, too.

In fact so far my 4-cyl 6-speed auto Aura has only gotten ~26 on the same daily commute that my 335i gets ~23 and I'm driving the Aura MUCH easier... much more coasting, way more gradual acceleration, etc. If anything I'm kinda disappointed that I have half as much power, am driving like an old man, and am only seeing 3mpg better because of it.

Granted I think highway mileage will be a more significant difference and I also think the Aura might improve as it breaks in and adjusts to my driving habits.
Threxx is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 01:15 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,023
Originally Posted by Threxx
Audi's 2.0t should be BMW's benchmark to beat for driving pleasure and economy... the 2.0t is amazingly capable in both categories as I can personally attest to from having owned an 06 A4. It was quick, felt even quicker than it actually was, very responsive, and ridiculously good fuel economy considering how I drove it (~29-31 in the city, ~36-40 highway were my real world numbers, consistently)
I agree, but it needs to be on the level of the 265hp variation of that motor.
97QuasarBlue3.8 is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 01:43 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,338
Originally Posted by 97QuasarBlue3.8
I agree, but it needs to be on the level of the 265hp variation of that motor.
If it's going to be their entry level motor then I don't think it does.

Audi made the 265hp variation of the 2.0t because they discontinued their V6 (which was pretty much the worst in class V6 offering out there).

Since BMW already has a nice I6 they really only need a ~200-220hp I4 turbo, then maybe get the 3.0 I6 making more like ~270hp and the 3.0tt I6 making ~335hp and suddenly the world makes sense all over again.
Threxx is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
12-01-2016 05:37 PM
Injuneer
Advanced Tech
0
01-15-2015 02:49 PM
ScottZ
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
13
08-02-2002 11:45 PM
z28projects4ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
07-16-2002 07:48 PM
Fbodfather
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
06-21-2002 04:12 PM



Quick Reply: BMW confirms four-cylinder engine for the U.S. market



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.