Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Base v8, Good or Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 11:36 PM
  #61  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by IZ28
But the IROC-Z was a.....Z28. IROC-Z28.
I think i may have seen non-Iroc 3rd gen z28's. Wasn't the Iroc and option on top of the z28 (much like the current SS).

Last edited by RiceEating5.0; Aug 2, 2003 at 11:42 PM.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 12:49 AM
  #62  
zero231's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 160
From: pnw
I think i may have seen non-Iroc 3rd gen z28's. Wasn't the Iroc and option on top of the z28 (much like the current SS).
from 85-87, the IROC package was an add-on to the Z28 model. from 88-90 it was it replaced the Z28 as the high end model....

But the IROC-Z was a.....Z28. IROC-Z28.
I always considered an IROC the same thing as what the SS is now...it had the same engine, but got different wheels, better suspension and some other small stuff...the early 4thgen SS cars were "Z28 SS" cars, so they are Z28s too?
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 08:14 AM
  #63  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Originally posted by zero231
from 85-87, the IROC package was an add-on to the Z28 model. from 88-90 it was it replaced the Z28 as the high end model....
In my cousins 89 IROC the emblem on the dash says Z28 in big letters. On a 4th gen SS model there are no Z28 emblems any where (Iam only stating this because it was supposed to be "Z28-SS").
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 08:57 AM
  #64  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Originally posted by Z28x
I think there needs to be a statute of limitations on what new cars can due based on automotive history. Just because chevy did somthing for 1-3 years 40 years ago doesn't mean they should or shouldn't do it today. The Vette had a 6 cyl. at one time but I don't think we should ever see a 6 cyl. Vette again.

Lets focus on Chevys since 1990 for example, just about all SS meant performance upgrades.

1991 454SS = upgrade from 350 to 454
94-96 Impalla SS = upgrade to LT1
96-2002 Camaro SS = more HP,upgraded exhust,Ram Air, wider tires.
00-03 Monte SS = spoiler
2004 Monte SS = supercharged V6 (they finall got it right)
2004 Impala SS = supercharged V6
03-04 Silverado SS = upgrade from 285HP to 345HP 6.0L V8

These cars are fresher in peoples minds than cars made 40 years ago.

It would just be bad marketing to have the SS the top performance model in every car/truck but not the camaro. It would confuse non-chevy people. THe SS CAmaro should also have more HP than the 4th Gen, which had 345HP with all SLP options in 2002.

My vote would be to have the Z28 and SS both have the same 390HP 6.0L V8, but have different body kits and some differnet options.
I get what your saying, but IMO SS is a trim package. I' ll compare your list to some ford products to get my point across. Because what your saying is SS is to Chevy what SVT is to Ford.

1.) 1991 454 SS= the 454 was the same motor that was available in the 2500 series trucks (nothing different), suspension was the optional suspension available on any 1500 series truck.
So pretty much the only thing special was the color combo and the SS 454 stickers on the side.
1992 SVT Lightning= Specific 351, suspension, interior, wheels front end.
2.) 00-03 Monte SS= Lesabre 3.8, Emblems and some cool Taz stickers 04 Monte/Impi SS = 240 hp s/c (not even the upgraded motor thats in the grand prix) same as buick GS, 17" wheels and an upgraded suspension, and it still won't keep up with the GP Comp G package.
Any Taurus SHO= specific motor, trans, wheels, exterior fascia suspension, ect.
3.) 03-04 Siverado SS=6.0 V8 found in a number of other trucks, 20" wheels. exterior trim and a nice SS badge on the dash
Current Harley truck (the SS is so pathetic I woundn't put it in the same class as a lightning) 5.4 s/c, different interior, grill, nice little decals ect.
4.) Camaro SS=Same engine as "lower" model Z28, hood, spoiler, wheels, suspension tuning
Cobra= Specific S/C 32 Valve 4.6 (just that is cool compared to anything on the 4th gen) different interior, front end, rear end, spoiler, brake's, wider wheels, suspension, transmission, independent rear suspension.
5.)94-96 Impala SS: Same motor as any Taxi/cop car, Wheels, suspension, exterior, interior.
Maurader: Same stuff as the Impi., shares the Mach 1 motor

Please correct me if some of my info is wrong. I know I'm being an a-hole with my chevrolet descriptions, but thats the cold hard truth.

The Z28 and SS can share the same motor but the Z28 should always perform better than the SS.
Z28= performance
SS= little bit softer and fancier.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 09:02 AM
  #65  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Originally posted by steves
In my cousins 89 IROC the emblem on the dash says Z28 in big letters. On a 4th gen SS model there are no Z28 emblems any where (Iam only stating this because it was supposed to be "Z28-SS").
Exactly. It was recognized as an upgraded Z28, not a "new" and improved model with a name that has nothing to do with what it is. If the SS was done correctly it never would have been an upgraded Z28, LOL. The Z28 was the car that got all the good stuff, the only thing the SS ever had was more ci, but I doubt as much HP as the 302.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #66  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by IZ28
But the IROC-Z was a.....Z28. IROC-Z28.

Oh boy...


Originally posted by zero231
I always considered an IROC the same thing as what the SS is now...it had the same engine, but got different wheels, better suspension and some other small stuff...the early 4thgen SS cars were "Z28 SS" cars, so they are Z28s too?
Exactly...

You need to understand that a certain 3rd Gen fan here likes to re-write reality.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #67  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
[QUOTE]Originally posted by guionM
If you are talking about who I think you are, I will vouch 100%, he's very much a Camaro guy. Though him & I don't agree on some things, his commitment is the one thing I don't question. I disagree with the Camaro as a Corvette with a token back seat view, or that the SS should surplant the Z28, but that's an issue all Camaro enthusiasts have to vote on.

If they actually give us the choice and stop making all the decisions for us for a change that is. I'm also positive that if it is up to us, the want for the Z28 as the top/1LE-like/Z06-like car will be heard.

Z28 was the top model from a standard engine standpoint. But SS has the horsepower most years & the torque, so it can be credibly debated "our Camaro guy", and is.... very hotly.

Not really and we've all been through this before. Z28 was the top model from virtually every view you look at it including the 1st Gen and you know what I mean Guion. There's no reason to explain it all again and especially to you.

I agree 100% that Z28 IS Camaro, while SS is just a generic name.

No doubt. It was the top car for 20-something years out of 35!!

But in all fairness, a Camaro SS today would be exactly like the 4th gen Camaro SS. But the SS would have an optional 6.0 liter V8, while Z28 would share Z06's LS6. While Ford is doing something like this with Mustang's engine lineup, but....

Yup, and if there is no enginechoices like what the M*stang is offering or no plans on doing them in a few years after the car is more established, they will feel the idiocy of not doing it. But I disagree that the SS today is what the SS would be. The SS would not be an upgraded Z28, Z28's have always been great all around performers, SS's were not and more focused on going in a straight line only.

Last edited by IZ28; Aug 3, 2003 at 10:36 AM.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 10:59 AM
  #68  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally posted by RiceEating5.0
Your post made me notice the url to this forum/board. http://web.camaroSS.com/forums/. Sounds like they aren't playing favorites
.
I was thinking the exact same thing.

How did this turn into the SS vs. Z/28 for top model designation debate? Was that because I suggested that the SS should be the lower HP V8 and Z/28 the Top Dog?

While I do realize, that the top dog performance version of every Chevy model is "SS", that is NOT the case with Corvette, and shouldn't be the case with Camaro if there is going to be a Z/28 model. If people are that hung up on it, then just drop the SS designation and call it something else... or just call it Camaro.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #69  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Maybe it would be best to just drop SS and go without it like the Corvette does.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 02:51 PM
  #70  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by IZ28
Maybe it would be best to just drop SS and go without it like the Corvette does.
What do you think GM will/would? Pay special attention to the current trend (SS as top performance models on many of chevy models), and the way Chevy has positioned the SS since 96. Do you see them reversing that or even entertaining the dropping of SS all together?

The vette may have not gotten the SS designation, but it never had such designation to begin with. The camaro on the other hand has.

Historically speaking, the SS was the model with the bigger motor, Hp and Tq. Both have been with the camaro since the very beginning and have their place in camaro history (one a little more storied than the other). For that reason, i think the SS has a place in the camaro lineup. I'm not going to argue for which deserves to be the top model though.

Last edited by RiceEating5.0; Aug 5, 2003 at 08:33 PM.
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #71  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by jg95z28

While I do realize, that the top dog performance version of every Chevy model is "SS", that is NOT the case with Corvette, and shouldn't be the case with Camaro if there is going to be a Z/28 model. If people are that hung up on it, then just drop the SS designation and call it something else... or just call it Camaro.
That may be the best way to end all of this turmoil.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 07:50 PM
  #72  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
I'd love a base V8---great for people that feel the 6 is not enough and the top "SS" model (Exspensive) is out of reach.

I think Ford has it figured out. GT/ Mach 1/ SVT--
people have a choice and it makes for a more interesting variety.

Gimme 310hp from a "base" V8 (maybe 5.0 displacement?) and they'd make me and thousands of other people happy
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #73  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
I'll just chime in on the Z28 dash plaque 9does say IROC underneath it) on 88-90 IROC's. True the plaques are there and the Z28 rpo is in the glovebox. But....the cars are IROC's not
Z28's. There was no Z28 from 88-90 and Z28's never had 16" wheels up to that point or 350TPI or body coloured GFX.

GM was just too stupid and cheap to change the dash plaque.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 08:13 PM
  #74  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
The IROC-Z was a Z28, that is why the dash was kept the same and the RPO was changed from B4Z to Z28 when there was no more regular Z28. Just because there was no base Z28 didn't mean that the car became an "IROC" instead of an IROC-Z or IROC-Z28. All it is and was is an upgraded Z28, having no base Z28 88-90 didn't change that. It's just that the only choice you had was RS and upgraded Z28, no "middle" top car.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 08:47 PM
  #75  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
I honestly haven't read any of the previous posts, but I did want to add my .02...

There needs to be a base V8. There NEEDS to be. Think about it...most people that want a Camaro want a V8...but they don't necessarily want to PAY for a V8. That was the beautiful thing about third gens compared to 4ths...the V8 was readily available and cheap in base/RS models. Sure, it was no match for 5.0s, but it WAS a V8...

When I was selling 'Birds in '02, I had so many people say to me "Sure, this $23,000 Firebird is nice...but where's the V8? Why should I have to pay $5,000 more for a comparable Formula just to get a V8, and suspension goodies and/or brakes I don't need?!?!?"

What happened to a nice $800 or so 4.8 V8? Would that have killed GM? NO. I sold 2 stripper Formulas to old folks who traded in, you guessed it, third gen 305 TBI Birds. They had to have the 8, didn't wanna pay for the Formula, but had to anyways...

You have no idea how many loaded, $24,000 Base Firebirds I could have blown out. Why call it a separate model? Make it a damn base model, and give it an 8!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.