2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #106  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

All this sounds fine to me. I don't feel that the mid level engine has to beat up on the GT, just offer a similar feel. Just a nice pleasing driving experience, broad torque curve, good sound. Similar to the late 3rd gens with the L03 (no flames please).

I would probably want the TDC, but my wife would most certainly go for the base model w/ the smaller, less powerful V8, but she would definetly want the 8.

Jason, like the wheels
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #107  
RussStang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by JasonD
It happened, believe me. It was especially common among female dbuyers. No stereotype implied, just the facts there. 300 hp scared many people away. 200 was more withing their comfort zone.
I am sure it happened, I just have my exteme doubts about the frequency of which it occured that is insinuated on this board. I would bet that for every one person that was actually scared of the power output of the car, there were more than a few buyers that would make up for it. Too much Hp is not something I contribute to the death of the 4th gen. 9 years with poor advertising and no serious redesigns in an increasingly style competitive segment is.


More sales because the buyer has more of a choice both power-wise and finance-wise.
Isn't that what the v6 is for? To give the buyer an alternative engine if they want the car cheaper, but don't care about the performance. Insurance might be higher, but as we all know with GM's LS engines, fuel efficiency isn't an issue.


Not the norm, but definitely a factor.
I am sure it is a factor, but somehow I doubt that it is as big a one as played up on this board. I have never seen an auto manufacturer that didn't advertise that their automobile made more power in its segment than any of the competitors, because that is point worth making to spark interest in the vehicle.


Have you really looked at those Hemi sales numbers? I haven't myself but I was told they are not as good when the numbers get added up. I need to see if I can dig those up....
I believe the Hemi sales make up around half of all LX cars sold, give or take. I am not completely sure on this though, but I know it is a solid percentage.

But anyway, we are not talking about now, we are talking about back in the mid-late 90s or so when it was noticed more and when f-body sales were crucial. This was when when the Mustang had not much more than 200 hp base and the f-body had 100 more. You gotta look at the broader spectrum. The the LS1 f-body was still being made, those Hemis were barely out, if at all.
I am trying to look at the broader spectrum, and I don't think keeping Hp down is a real issue to be concerned with in the 5th gen. I think the styling, and keeping it from being an "engine in a box" is. The fbody sales may have been dying off in the 90s, but apparently someone at Ford was concerned with the growing gap in Hp between the Cambirds and the Mustang when the LS1 was introduced, because it wasn't long before the PI head equipped Mustangs came out with 260 Hp, to try to narrow the gap some.

Right, and the horsepower problem was not the number one sales deterrant, but once again, definitely a factor. Those Hemi cars are not aggressive muscle cars, they are more of a luxury vehicle. The power is preceived differently. In a Camaro, 350hp is loud, rough and aggressive. In a sedan, it is refined for passing power, cruising speed, etc. etc.
Camaros are kind of thought of as loud, rough, and aggressive period ( I wouldn't have it any other way.) Its just the image that fits the Camaro. I don't think that this has a whole lot to do with Hp, just its styling.


Compare that to Mustang sales with less horsepower than both GTOs.

And those older GTOs sat only because it was leaked that the LS2 would be in the new GTO, so everyone who wanted a GTO waited for that.
The Mustang kills the GTO in sales, but it is because of styling, and price, and I have said multiple times that styling is the most important factor. I just don't think it is fair to punish the guys who aren't going to be able to afford a $30k Camaro with a $20k v8 Camaro that doesn't kick ***, and smoke the competition. There are people that buy these cars for more than just image. It has been brought up numerous times that the Camaro and the Mustang are not solely crossed shopped with each other either. With more cars like the 350z, which will likely recieve a bump to 300hp on all of its models, a rumored 350hp Suby STI, a rumored Dodge Challenger, an Evo X, a possible RX-7, and possible others, I think having a fire breathing base v8 is even more prevalent.
As I stated, we enthusiasts may be in the minority, but we are the ones who make our voices known. How many people's opinions have been swayed due to advise you have gave them? JasonD wrote tonight that his fiance now appreciates third gens, and no longer likes Jettas. Sounds like his opinion had a large degree of influence over her. Case in point.

I guess my point for all this rambling is, keeping Hp down should be the least of concerns on the engineer's minds behind the developed of the 5th gen. Last I checked, I had complete control of my right foot, and I can only assume this is a constant for everyone else as well. If you don't like the power, don't put your foot to the floor. I still want a great base v8, not another 305 disaster.

Last edited by RussStang; Sep 20, 2005 at 10:19 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:21 PM
  #108  
turbo96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

awhile back i said i would like to see GM go back to a more broader spectrum of models ala 3rd gen. i know it all comes down to the beancounters, but we need more than one V8 and a nice peppy V6. and i'm not just talkin like 3.9, 5.3, 6.2.....hows this sound to you guys......

3.9 in base and RS
optional 5.3 in base and RS
5.3 H.O. in base SS
optional 6.2 in SS
s/c 6.2 or LS7 (i'm hoping for the later) in the Z/28

change the names as you will, just my preference. sounds like alot, but it would cover all bases and all buyers from mild to wild straight out of the dealer.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #109  
RussStang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Its got my vote, except I don't think the v6 should be offered in RS trim at all. Other than that, I am all for it. Don't think we will see that many v8s though, unless there are some special editions cars made (fingers crossed for ZL1.)
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:34 PM
  #110  
turbo96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by RussStang
(fingers crossed for ZL1.)
that just made me giggle...LS7....ZL1......[Homer simpson voice]ooooooooooooohhhhhh baaaaabbyyyy[/Homer Simpson voice]
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #111  
RussStang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by turbo96z28
that just made me giggle...LS7....ZL1......[Homer simpson voice]ooooooooooooohhhhhh baaaaabbyyyy[/Homer Simpson voice]
I would get out of my chair and go scream and dance in the middle of my street if I knew GM was going to put an LS7 in a special edition ZL1. Then I would promptly come back inside and figure out a way to afford it in the next few years.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:48 PM
  #112  
turbo96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by RussStang
I would get out of my chair and go scream and dance in the middle of my street if I knew GM was going to put an LS7 in a special edition ZL1. Then I would promptly come back inside and figure out a way to afford it in the next few years.
i'd wait til i figured out how to afford it before running through my neighborhood....hmmmmmm...already budgeted for $30K for the my 5th gen......

i need to go see about a night job...
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:48 PM
  #113  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

They more or less already did

https://www.camaroz28.com/articles/2002zl1/index.shtml

http://www.gmmginc.net/html/zl1_camaro.html
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #114  
turbo96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

definetley something i would not mind carried over from the 4th gen...
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 05:04 AM
  #115  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by turbo96z28
i'd wait til i figured out how to afford it before running through my neighborhood....hmmmmmm...already budgeted for $30K for the my 5th gen......

i need to go see about a night job...
Try a weekend job, night jobs are no fun. This is coming from a third-shift guy.
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 08:16 AM
  #116  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by CLEAN
Just a nice pleasing driving experience, broad torque curve, good sound. Similar to the late 3rd gens with the L03 (no flames please).
How can you flame over the best selling Camaro trim of all time?!?!

Ahhh, The L03 Thirdgen. Perfect example of looks, feel, and performance (for it's time). It had about 30% less horsepower then the top dog model (L98) and sold circles around it...

It doesn't have to be a 11s car out of the box to sell well, and GM needs this new 5thgen to sell!
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #117  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

I think you might be reading just a bit too far into what I said. All I am saying is, f-body sales were lost due to too much horsepower. That's it.

I then added that I think perhaps a broader choice of power levels would help reduce that in the future.

But what do I know?

Originally Posted by RussStang
JasonD wrote tonight that his fiance now appreciates third gens, and no longer likes Jettas. Sounds like his opinion had a large degree of influence over her. Case in point.
I do not know where you are getting this from. I do not have a fiance, I am married and I have been for over 5 years. My wife drives a Chevrolet, has always liked 3rd gens and doesn't have any interest in VW.
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 09:21 AM
  #118  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

heh
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 10:01 AM
  #119  
RussStang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by JasonD
I think you might be reading just a bit too far into what I said. All I am saying is, f-body sales were lost due to too much horsepower. That's it.

I then added that I think perhaps a broader choice of power levels would help reduce that in the future.

But what do I know?



I do not know where you are getting this from. I do not have a fiance, I am married and I have been for over 5 years. My wife drives a Chevrolet, has always liked 3rd gens and doesn't have any interest in VW.

Sorry, I didn't mean you, I meant Jason E. One letter off there. I do agree with you though, a broader choice of power levels would be great. I just want to see: v6,*edit* base v8 for sales (one that still makes plenty of power though), and then the top dog v8.

I am still not satisfied with the statement f-bodies sales were lost because of too much hp though. It may have some validity to it, but I could also say fbody sales were lost because they didn't offer yellow as a color option. I am sure that probably cost a few sales, but is it worth bringing up as one of significant failures of the car (although more color options never hurt anyone.)

Last edited by RussStang; Sep 21, 2005 at 10:11 AM.
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #120  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Re: Possible engines in top dog Camaro?

Originally Posted by RussStang
Sorry, I didn't mean you, I meant Jason E. One letter off there.
Oh, okay...that would explain everything!

I do agree with you though, a broader choice of power levels would be great. I just want to see: v6, weak base v8 for sales, and then the top dog v8.
I wonder if it won't be like how the Z06 didn't come out the first year of the C5. It took a year or two before that came out. Just speculating.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.