2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: GM Reportedly Calls "Game On" For Supercharged 550HP Camaro Z/28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 08:40 AM
  #301  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Originally Posted by CLEAN
Agreed. I tried to get a number about 15 pages back of how many people who don't like the current set up would buy one if their major hang up was fixed, and only 1 guy came forward and said he would. A few others complained about my choice of words in the question, which kind of makes me think that some people just like to complain .

They may not like the fact that it's not the optimal set up for their interests, and I think thats mostly in the name. The hard core traditionalists view the Z28 as it was in the first gen, but this Z28 is a modern day SS396, no other way to look at it (and about as far from the original Z28 formula as you can get.)

What I don't think that they're really processing the fact that there are a lot of folks out there w/ cash in hand that would love the oportunity to buy a factory supercharged Camaro (the only time its ever happened, and also it's HIGHLY likely to be the most powerful Camaro that has ever been, or ever will be built). It doesn't have to be a volume mover, it just has to pay for itself and make GM a little PROFIT.

I'm of the opinion now that GM should offer the following...
V6 and SS stay the same

Z28 as an SS w/ a "track pack" or "Z51" or whatever you want to call a suspension/gearing/tire package

ZL1 as what the Z28 is planned to be.
Only problem is only a few people have ever heard of a ZL1 outside this forum, Chevrolet is trying to mass market this car, everyone has heard of a Z28. I hear you on the bitching going on in this thread, a lot of people on here seem to want a Corvette but won't admit it.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #302  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by AZ2ENVY
The actual quote for the hood was $23,XXX.XX around 2 weeks ago posted by the shop owner

It wasnt a Super Snake it was just a GT500KR that hit a deer .
It was $23k+ but after complaints Shelby dropped the price to $9k. There was an article on one of the auto sites linked from some thread somewhere in this forum.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #303  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by STOCK1SC
Only problem is only a few people have ever heard of a ZL1 outside this forum, Chevrolet is trying to mass market this car, everyone has heard of a Z28. I hear you on the bitching going on in this thread, a lot of people on here seem to want a Corvette but won't admit it.
100% Agreed. Yet another reason to stick with Z/28.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #304  
95redLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by boomer78
This was a Shelby GT500 Super Snake hood...done and charged outragously by SHELBY Corp.
NOT a Ford part at all.
Yep...here is a link...

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/11/s...b-outrage-eru/
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #305  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by CLEAN
The hard core traditionalists view the Z28 as it was in the first gen, but this Z28 is a modern day SS396, no other way to look at it (and about as far from the original Z28 formula as you can get.)
Couldn't agree more, and while true, we need to keep in mind that had Trans AM not required a 5.0L maximum displacement for the production model the cars were based on, the Z/28 may have never existed. Don't forget in 1970 the Z/28 grew to 5.7L after the rules were changed.

Had that been the case, the SS would have been the "only" performance Camaro (aside from the L30/M20) and we wouldn't be arguing today.

Originally Posted by CLEAN
Z28 as an SS w/ a "track pack" or "Z51" or whatever you want to call a suspension/gearing/tire package

ZL1 as what the Z28 is planned to be.
Perhaps offer a "track pack" option on the SS, heck I'm not entirely unconvinced it shouldn't be offered on the LT as well, however it does not need a separate model designation. People will order it. I doubt a "stripper" Z/28 could be made profitable anyway. (Ala Cobra R)

As previously mentioned there is no "brand recognition" outside of the enthusiast world that knows ZL1, furthermore as previously stated, it was never a model designation for Camaro.

I much rather like, and could live with "SS Supercharged" than ZL1 for the LSA Camaro. However, I have no issues with and would rather see it called "Z28".
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #306  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Couldn't agree more, and while true, we need to keep in mind that had Trans AM not required a 5.0L maximum displacement for the production model the cars were based on, the Z/28 may have never existed. Don't forget in 1970 the Z/28 grew to 5.7L after the rules were changed.

Had that been the case, the SS would have been the "only" performance Camaro (aside from the L30/M20) and we wouldn't be arguing today.
True.
Vince Piggins created the Z/28 in order to establish a powerful performance image for the new kid on the block Camaro, countering the one Mustang already had.

He must've been pretty successful at it too, because here we are 43 years later in a 20 page thread.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #307  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by STOCK1SC
Only problem is only a few people have ever heard of a ZL1 outside this forum.
Not entirely true, I'm pretty much a Mustang guy and I've known about the ZL1 for years. I'd say ZL1 is just about as infamous as the L88 vettes, speaking of which, how many people knew what a ZR1(or know about the ZR2 vettes) was before its second introduction in the 90's? Or the Z06? I'd argue that outside of vette circles, those names were largely unheard of. GM could call the S/C F5 the ESADW 9000 and it wouldn't hurt a thing.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #308  
dacook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 206
What I don't think that they're really processing the fact that there are a lot of folks out there w/ cash in hand that would love the oportunity to buy a factory supercharged Camaro...
Yep, that's me. Let's have it before the wife thinks of something else to spend the money on.

While I respect the racers on here, I don't want a stripper car. And GM knows there are a lot more customers like me than there are racers out there. Bring on the loaded supercharged Camaro! With MP3 connector and super audio set-up. And power leather seats. And, yes, a convertible model too! Weight shmeight.

Only please give me a modern display and dash.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #309  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
Originally Posted by 95redLT1
what in the hell would justify that hood being 20k? it could be made of gold and stil not be worth 20k.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 02:49 PM
  #310  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by dacook
Yep, that's me. Let's have it before the wife thinks of something else to spend the money on.

While I respect the racers on here, I don't want a stripper car. And GM knows there are a lot more customers like me than there are racers out there. Bring on the loaded supercharged Camaro! With MP3 connector and super audio set-up. And power leather seats. And, yes, a convertible model too! Weight shmeight.

Only please give me a modern display and dash.
There is a difference between "stripper" and "fun to drive". One doesn't equal the other. And one shouldn't be confused for the other.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #311  
dacook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by Z284ever
There is a difference between "stripper" and "fun to drive". One doesn't equal the other. And one shouldn't be confused for the other.
So why won't it be fun to drive they way it's going to be?
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #312  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Z284ever
There is a difference between "stripper" and "fun to drive". One doesn't equal the other. And one shouldn't be confused for the other.
You're suggesting that the LSA Camaro wouldn't be fun to drive. For folks like dacook and myself it would be extremely fun to drive. And if you're suggesting that our numbers don't out number the buyers would want a lightweight stripper Camaro, then you're the one that's confused.

Quite frankly, there are more buyers out there with the means to purchase a fully loaded to the hilt supercharged Camaro. Those buyers far exceed the numbers crying that such a car shouldn't be called Z/28 because its not a naturally aspirated stripper racecar. GM isn't going to ignore us.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #313  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by dacook
So why won't it be fun to drive they way it's going to be?

Come on man, we've got a 21 page thread going - haven't you read any of it?

Last edited by Z284ever; Sep 25, 2009 at 03:31 PM.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #314  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by dacook
So why won't it be fun to drive they way it's going to be?
It will be for people like us who will be the ones actually buying the car.
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #315  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by jg95z28
You're suggesting that the LSA Camaro wouldn't be fun to drive. For folks like dacook and myself it would be extremely fun to drive. And if you're suggesting that our numbers don't out number the buyers would want a lightweight stripper Camaro, then you're the one that's confused.

Quite frankly, there are more buyers out there with the means to purchase a fully loaded to the hilt supercharged Camaro. Those buyers far exceed the numbers crying that such a car shouldn't be called Z/28 because its not a naturally aspirated stripper racecar. GM isn't going to ignore us.
I haven't suggested anything, in fact somewhere in this thread I've congratulated everyong looking for a car like this. And I mean that.

And please stop with "stripper" comments already. Deleting PDL isn't going to fix the steering or chassis dynamics.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.