2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Good god guys get a grip!!!!

Old Jul 24, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #196  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
okay. I've got to go prepare for a meeting with some out of town, corporate, bigwigs. After I give their "corporate-speak", bureaucratic a$$es a piece of my mind, I'll get back with some thoughts....
.
......................and THIS post -- in and of itself speaks VOLUMES..........

--dying to know what business these 'big wigs' are in.............
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #197  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Originally Posted by SSbaby
You know I'm not saying that!

I'm keen to know Dale Earnhardt Jr's opinion on the test mule, however. I know he commented it has too much body roll but I didn't get his final analysis... he's surely someone whose opinion would be greatly respected, no matter how much subjective thought is expressed here without any of us having driven one.

He would know if the 5G has captured the Camaro spirit better than most!


Keep in mind that the car Dale Jr. drove was about a 60% car-- so it's really pointless to talk about handling..............
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #198  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
For your consideration:

We were threatened within an inch of our sorry lives that if we changed this car from the concept.............................there WOULD be hell to pay. I don't think anyone can argue (well.....I shouldn't say that -- one or two would argue that blue was green..........)..........that we kept this car as close as possible to the concept.

Interestingly -- had we kept a front suspension cradle from the G8, the car would NOT look like it does today. -- we actually moved the front axle forward -- to keep the look of the concept. Guess what? Weight.

Now -- not everyone loved the concept -- but what you CANNOT deny is that the concept took the world by storm. I don't ever remember a car getting this much attention -- I don't ever remember people bursting into tears when a car (or truck) was unveiled. I don't ever remember watching people of all ages just stand in front of the concept at any number of shows -- and just gape at it for minutes on end............

................now -- COULD we get the weight down? Well -- do you want a car that LOOKS like a Camaro -- or do you want a car that looks like a BMW. (oh -- wait -- that's right -- even BMW hasn't hit the target number that some of you have set.....using exotic materials!!!....)

And Charlie -- to answer your earlier question? You and I have talked about the same subject over and over and over and over again...it's the 'broken record' subject of weight -- and if you don't remember what I told you, it tells me you weren't listening! -- any of the times we talked!
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #199  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
I know this sounds sarcastic -- but I swear that some must think that our engineers PURPOSELY made the car heavy........it's almost like 'well....now...let's see how we can make this car heavy - let's see how we can HURT OURSELVES in terms of CAFE --- oh -- wait -- we're all foolish and stupid and none of us own Camaros and Firebirds and live/eat/breathe them..........
I think much of the negativity some have will be gone once the car is available. Once they get the chance to experience the car in reality and not in the abstract. I don't think everyone here on this site ever intended to buy a new Camaro. I wish they would though :->

I have every reason to believe it's the best Camaro yet offered to the pervious fans and the new folks who will join in the passion.

Affordable is a very key point. It isn't enough to build a car people want. I know the Camaro will handle that part and people will want it. It won't be too long before it's clear the car will be the best in the segment and a big bang for the buck.

I share the big excitement with those that are anticipating their new Camaro, be it 6 cyl or V8. I can't wait to hear all the great times folks are going to have with their new Camaro.

All of the folks that I know at GM are huge car fanatics, passionate, particularly when it comes to cars GM makes.

This will be evident when the Camaro hit's the dealers and streets...

Last edited by 1fastdog; Jul 24, 2008 at 11:51 PM.
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #200  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
Affordable is a very key point. It isn't enough to build a car people want. I know the Camaro will handle that part and people will want it. It won't be too long before it's clear the car will be the best in the segment and a big bang for the buck.
Great post! My sentiments exactly.

IMO, the key to its success is not the weight factor... it's the price (followed, IMO, by the build quality). I'll probably lose my wife over it but it might be worth it (assuming it arrives downunder)!
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #201  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Great post! My sentiments exactly.

IMO, the key to its success is not the weight factor... it's the price (followed, IMO, by the build quality). I'll probably lose my wife over it but it might be worth it (assuming it arrives downunder)!
I think the Camaro would be a huge hit in Australia.

As for losing the wife? Try a nice necklace in the glovebox she can find on your first drive together in it.
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #202  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
\And Charlie -- to answer your earlier question? You and I have talked about the same subject over and over and over and over again...it's the 'broken record' subject of weight -- and if you don't remember what I told you, it tells me you weren't listening! -- any of the times we talked!

Oh, I listened Scott. I don't know why you're getting mad at me. If after ALL of those conversations we had, if you thought a two ton Camaro wouldn't make me apoplectic, then you were the one not listening.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #203  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
I think the Camaro would be a huge hit in Australia.

As for losing the wife? Try a nice necklace in the glovebox she can find on your first drive together in it.
Now that's a great idea. I'm glad this website is more than just a car forum!

The key will be to price it reasonably... if it's priced at outgoing Monaro RRP, it will be a sellout!!!
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #204  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
The way I look at it is when Zeta was chosen it was gonna be a heavy car and that was that. Either Zeta or no Camaro. I'd rather have a heavy Camaro out there than none. It's been gone too long already. There'll probably be another Gen coming along for those that don't like this one for whatever reason. I'm sure we all have our complaints, I know I do.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:25 AM
  #205  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by PacerX
The 4.6 is heavier.
In which dress? 2v, 3v or 4v? The 3v is the lightest of the bunch and IIRC about 20 pounds lighter dressed than the LSx, The 2v is obviously heavier since none came in all aluminum, and the 4v even in all aluminum trim is heavier than the LSx.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:40 AM
  #206  
94Z28/03mach1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 249
From: casselberry ,FL
I used to feel like my "06 stang was much heavier than I liked,but ya know what?Its a featherweight now ain't it! 3500lbs is the new 3200lbs.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #207  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
I am not buying all this weight crap. The Mustang is under 3500 pounds. How did Ford do it? I am no engineer but why would moving the axle forward add weight? Only thing I can think of is it might have not performed as well in crash tests so they added more strength to it, which would add weight.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 04:48 AM
  #208  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
Thank you for the kind words -- and the thought that went into this post.

I know this sounds sarcastic -- but I swear that some must think that our engineers PURPOSELY made the car heavy........it's almost like 'well....now...let's see how we can make this car heavy - let's see how we can HURT OURSELVES in terms of CAFE --- oh -- wait -- we're all foolish and stupid and none of us own Camaros and Firebirds and live/eat/breathe them..........

Sorry - but I'm losing what little patience I have -- I have explained over and over again WHY it is nearly impossible to get a Camaro down to 3,500 pounds and at the same time offer what most people want at an AFFORDABLE price....

Dear GOD how many times have I heard about the axles or brakes in the 4th gen -- all due to weight concerns -- but it seems that some have selective memory.

I just wish I could drag a few people (BY THE EARS) into a meeting and make them sit there and listen to the thousands upon thousands of man-hours that went into trying to get this car right and pull weight out of it AND KEEP IT AFFORDABE...........

But -- as I keep pointing out -- (and getting ignored.....) the other two domestics are facing the same problem.........

SO........

Either:

>We in Detroit are all stupid and should listen to a few on this board that evidently know more than any of these engineers.........

or

>a few people on here might want to consider listening to those in the industry that perhaps know something.................

I apologize to most of you -- I really hate posting a thread like this -- but I'm running on very little sleep -- and I know how hard the team has worked on this car -- and I can't quite understand how a few people who are not even in this industry have evidently figured this car out completely - WITHOUT EVER HAVING DRIVEN IT.........

So -- to most of you -- please forgive me. To a few of you - sorry -- but it's a free country -- you can choose as you will.......but I have a long memory and I think I'm gonna serve up some words for you to eat...........
No need at all to ask for forgiveness Scott! We appreciate and understand all the crazy hard work you and the rest of the crew at GM did in making this Camaro happen

It's a real shame some on this site keep going on and on about weight. I can relate to the desire for low weight - but I also fully comprehend the realities of making a car today with all its constraints and tradeoffs. And it sure looks to me, the new Camaro is the ideal result of good choices in all the tradeoffs of cost, weight, features, performance and marketability. Sure, I'd love a 3500 or 3400 lb 5gen. But it is simply not possible with today's tech, at a price point Camaro buyers (or even BMW buyers!) will go for. I wouldn't give up any of the features in the new Camaro's specs today, to shave off some weight. I want it all! Every last gorgeous cubic inch

You mentioned hearing the laments about 4gen brakes. It's wise to mention that - and I'm sorry to say, but I also have an anecdote. Brakes are very important to me in a performance car. I don't mean just "oh we all need good brakes". Everyone needs those. I'm talking instead about GOOD, powerful, well balenced and modulated, fade- and warp-free brakes. I have faith, based on the specs, the pix I've seen and other factors, that the new Camaro will have awesome brakes. Do these have weight impact? Of Course, as you well know. But it's clear, Chevy has decided to make sure the Camaro does not disappoint in this critical category, as you have mentioned. Anyway - let me mention my 99 Firebird Formula. I ordered and bought that car new, and loved it for 40k miles. But I am brutally hard on my cars. And I destroyed two sets of front brake rotors in the first year or two ... my dealer was kind enough to replace them all under warranty. But that car did not have what I would call awesome brakes. Good, but not great.

Fast forward to today. I have now owned a new 2005 GTO - that car had awesome brakes. I currently own a 2006 Grand Prix GXP - that car has awesome brakes and they have been holding up well to my lead foot. So I believe GM has it right now on brakes! And I simply Do Not Care if that has a weight impact.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 04:59 AM
  #209  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by TOO Z MAXX
I am not buying all this weight crap. The Mustang is under 3500 pounds. How did Ford do it? I am no engineer but why would moving the axle forward add weight? Only thing I can think of is it might have not performed as well in crash tests so they added more strength to it, which would add weight.
Moving that axle line forward had the effect of adding to wheelbase. The ideal design, if one did not care about wheelbase but ONLY about weight, would have large overhangs and a short wheelbase. Why? because it's like a bridge design. Long, uninterrupted spans (like the floorpan between the front and rear wheelhouses) require a massive amount of structure to maintain longitudinal and torsional stiffness and integrity in a crash. So car makers used to 'cheap out' by having long overhangs holding engines/cooling components etc and a trunk in the back (the 4gens were like this). But long overhangs have other bad effects besides looking goofy. They also cause a sacrifice in interior cabin space, and have bad effects on handling due to polar moment of inertia being worse.

I WISH people would stop comparing the new Camaro, with 400 HP and an IRS, to the 300 hp SRA 2008 Mustang.
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 06:08 AM
  #210  
hyperv6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 515
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
Thank you for the kind words -- and the thought that went into this post.

I know this sounds sarcastic -- but I swear that some must think that our engineers PURPOSELY made the car heavy........it's almost like 'well....now...let's see how we can make this car heavy - let's see how we can HURT OURSELVES in terms of CAFE --- oh -- wait -- we're all foolish and stupid and none of us own Camaros and Firebirds and live/eat/breathe them..........

Sorry - but I'm losing what little patience I have -- I have explained over and over again WHY it is nearly impossible to get a Camaro down to 3,500 pounds and at the same time offer what most people want at an AFFORDABLE price....

Dear GOD how many times have I heard about the axles or brakes in the 4th gen -- all due to weight concerns -- but it seems that some have selective memory.

I just wish I could drag a few people (BY THE EARS) into a meeting and make them sit there and listen to the thousands upon thousands of man-hours that went into trying to get this car right and pull weight out of it AND KEEP IT AFFORDABE...........

But -- as I keep pointing out -- (and getting ignored.....) the other two domestics are facing the same problem.........

SO........

Either:

>We in Detroit are all stupid and should listen to a few on this board that evidently know more than any of these engineers.........

or

>a few people on here might want to consider listening to those in the industry that perhaps know something.................

I apologize to most of you -- I really hate posting a thread like this -- but I'm running on very little sleep -- and I know how hard the team has worked on this car -- and I can't quite understand how a few people who are not even in this industry have evidently figured this car out completely - WITHOUT EVER HAVING DRIVEN IT.........

So -- to most of you -- please forgive me. To a few of you - sorry -- but it's a free country -- you can choose as you will.......but I have a long memory and I think I'm gonna serve up some words for you to eat...........
Let it rip Scott as too many here know how to remove B pillars make a car weigh in at 3200 pounds, get 40 MPG at 500 HP and make it all cost $19,000.

It is great to see someone put itr like it needs to be said.

If car building was as easy as posting on the web we would all be doing it!!!!

Now that we see the final production car you should be carving up the crow for many to eat. I think a few people should be posting in a "I am sorry Scott thread"

I can still remember the many post on how the white incomplete car just did not look like the show car complaints. Were are they now to say I am sorry I was wrong?

Last edited by hyperv6; Jul 25, 2008 at 06:11 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.