2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Even mule interiors are better than Dodge!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #61  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by christianjax
well to defend Dodge here for a second. What people are calling "parts bin" is actually a designed family resemblence. ALL new Dodge products share the same basic dash layout and look. Even though the gauges are different sizes and not really "parts bin". They are designed to flow through the production line. GM has done this too. So has Ford. It is a carryover from the "crosshair" grille, much like pontiac's split grille. And Ford's F**ked up grille.
That's a point well taken... Dodge does deserve kudos for their success with the Charger and the SRT8's. But I did test drive a Charger RT in 2005, and did not get all on fire to buy one. And I still think the Challenger needs a lot more interior differentiation than it's getting. JM02
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #62  
Dragoneye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 801
From: New York
Originally Posted by christianjax
well to defend Dodge here for a second. What people are calling "parts bin" is actually a designed family resemblence. ALL new Dodge products share the same basic dash layout and look. Even though the gauges are different sizes and not really "parts bin". They are designed to flow through the production line. GM has done this too. So has Ford. It is a carryover from the "crosshair" grille, much like pontiac's split grille. And Ford's F**ked up grille.
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
That's a point well taken... Dodge does deserve kudos for their success with the Charger and the SRT8's. But I did test drive a Charger RT in 2005, and did not get all on fire to buy one. And I still think the Challenger needs a lot more interior differentiation than it's getting. JM02
I think I'm one of the "part's bin" culprits...Like, BDF said - that's a good point, Christianjax. I suppose I hadn't thought of it that way. And I was expecting a little differenciation. But what you said definitely makes sense.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #63  
95firehawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 694
From: Brighton, IL
Originally Posted by notgetleft



You are either completely color blind, completely out of your mind or at the least just like to say dumb **** just for the sake of arguing if those halos aren't blue to you.

Given that, i've decided to just ignore everything you say from here on out. There's no point. If you can't even agree with me on what ****ing color the pictures we are looking at, then we will never agree on anything.
They are definately blue. This is the third thread where he has argued just for the sake of arguing. You'd have thought that BigDarknFast designed the interior himself the way he goes on and on about it.

I personally think the interior of the Camaro doesn't match the exterior. I believe that the Camaro should've gotten a more modern interior since its exterior is a more modern interpretation of previous Camaros. The Challenger should have been given a more retro theme due to the exterior looking more closely like the 70's version.

After seeing the interior of the Challenger as well as seeing the Concept Drag car (gonna have to do more research on that one) I might have to add the Challenger to the "potential buy" list along with the Mustang and Camaro. You know, since I was told to go out and buy a Mustang since I didn't find the interior to my liking.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #64  
5thGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 547
I think people got themselves all worked up over the camaro concept cars interior.

They decided then they hated it. The pre-production mule pics we've seen look like they've carried the same theme, but lost all the edginess from the orange highlights and machined aluminum. Personally, I like the mule interior pics I've seen. It's different but it does not look bad at all. It's only different from tradional interiors, but you can see the lineage to the 69 interior, but it is completely modern, exactly like the exterior.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #65  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
It's worth noting that the 08 Challenger's interior is (we think) the last one that was finalized under the OLD Daimler regime. There's already talk of some changes coming during the 09 model run -- pleated seats like the concept's, for starters.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #66  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Do you seriously encounter these dangerously low oil pressure conditions a lot, in cars you drive? If so, why? If you are going racing on a track, do you not check your oil level via the dipstick beforehand? Does your oil evaporate or disappear somehow? The fact is, oil pressure on modern cars is remarkably uniform... and very unlikely (if ever) to need constant monitoring, by drivers who after all, have much better things to be doing with their attention. Has your GTO ever, even once, needed immediate attention at a track event, due to low oil pressure?
Since you're so keen on "challenging certain statements", allow me to do the same. You're wrong, and here's why....

Yes, believe it or not, mechanically sound modern cars that are tracked can and do experience low oil pressure conditions in long, high g corners while maintaining "remarkably uniform" pressure in daily life. Sometimes even if you top off with a quart or more extra. Why?

Sometimes it is because the car is simply run hard and it normally consumes some oil anyway due to blowby (remember that most manufacturers consider anything up to 1 qt per 1000 miles to be "normal"). Other times it is because they inhale it through the PCV.

Sometimes (and this is probably most common) there is nothing wrong with the car but you're a competent driver on R comps and you're just simply going too hard for the stock unbaffled pan. I believe some 1st gen CTS-V owners hurt their cars this way. Heck, there have been blown engines in autocrossers (where we really don't have time to watch the gauges) because the stock pan starved the pump mid corner.

In any instance, if you notice the oil pressure is dipping precariously in corners, you'll have a chance to come off course BEFORE the dreaded it's - already - too - late - light springs to life. Even if you elect to not come off course you can still back off your pace and run within your mechanical limits BEFORE you hurt a bearing. And before you put the words in my mouth, I'm not saying that proper gauge placement is going to prevent all parts breakage. There is always the possibility of some catastrophic failure due to some heretofore undetected / undetectable condition when running the car hard.

There are more dual purpose (weekend funster / daily driver) cars out there than you may think. Note that I am NOT referring to the occasional drag racer here. I'm talking about HPDEs and time trials. Heck, I personally know a 20 year old college kid who tracks his daily driver Z3.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #67  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
Since you're so keen on "challenging certain statements", allow me to do the same. You're wrong, and here's why....

Yes, believe it or not, mechanically sound modern cars that are tracked can and do experience low oil pressure conditions in long, high g corners while maintaining "remarkably uniform" pressure in daily life. Sometimes even if you top off with a quart or more extra. Why?

Sometimes it is because the car is simply run hard and it normally consumes some oil anyway due to blowby (remember that most manufacturers consider anything up to 1 qt per 1000 miles to be "normal"). Other times it is because they inhale it through the PCV.

Sometimes (and this is probably most common) there is nothing wrong with the car but you're a competent driver on R comps and you're just simply going too hard for the stock unbaffled pan. I believe some 1st gen CTS-V owners hurt their cars this way. Heck, there have been blown engines in autocrossers (where we really don't have time to watch the gauges) because the stock pan starved the pump mid corner.

In any instance, if you notice the oil pressure is dipping precariously in corners, you'll have a chance to come off course BEFORE the dreaded it's - already - too - late - light springs to life. Even if you elect to not come off course you can still back off your pace and run within your mechanical limits BEFORE you hurt a bearing. And before you put the words in my mouth, I'm not saying that proper gauge placement is going to prevent all parts breakage. There is always the possibility of some catastrophic failure due to some heretofore undetected / undetectable condition when running the car hard.

There are more dual purpose (weekend funster / daily driver) cars out there than you may think. Note that I am NOT referring to the occasional drag racer here. I'm talking about HPDEs and time trials. Heck, I personally know a 20 year old college kid who tracks his daily driver Z3.
You certainly make a case that oil starvation CAN happen. But as I've said, that is not a typical duty cycle for a car such as this. A C6 Vette? Sure. Z06? Definitely. But the Camaro? It's more of a street car, than a full-blown track racer. I for one do not want to subsidize weekender track racers by supporting a notion the Camaro should have full-race dry sump oiling. Also - anyone who wants to track a Camaro can do so... but they will need special insurance (if they can afford it at all), and gosh I'd think they can also then afford a couple more gauges, placed wherever their heart desires.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #68  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast :
You certainly make a case that oil starvation CAN happen. But as I've said, that is not a typical duty cycle for a car such as this. A C6 Vette? Sure. Z06? Definitely. But the Camaro? It's more of a street car, than a full-blown track racer. I for one do not want to subsidize weekender track racers by supporting a notion the Camaro should have full-race dry sump oiling. Also - anyone who wants to track a Camaro can do so... but they will need special insurance (if they can afford it at all), and gosh I'd think they can also then afford a couple more gauges, placed wherever their heart desires.
Again, we are thinking that there's only going to be 1 version of Camaro.

But...while this may not be typical for a V6, base V8 Camaro...it most certainly IS just the type of duty cycle a Z28 MUST be equipped for...or miss its target demographic. A poor man's Vette.
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 03:44 AM
  #69  
Purple 92 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 506
From: Columbia, SC
Originally Posted by Purple 92 SS
jesus guys.. didnt scott say "redundancy"?!?!

quit bitchin till you see the finals of both in person and then bitch bout it..

sheesh.


I could have sworn i posted this on page 3....

highlighted by bolding and underlining so hopefully ya'll will read it now.
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 05:29 AM
  #70  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
Since you're so keen on "challenging certain statements", allow me to do the same. You're wrong, and here's why....

Yes, believe it or not, mechanically sound modern cars that are tracked can and do experience low oil pressure conditions in long, high g corners while maintaining "remarkably uniform" pressure in daily life. Sometimes even if you top off with a quart or more extra. Why?

Sometimes it is because the car is simply run hard and it normally consumes some oil anyway due to blowby (remember that most manufacturers consider anything up to 1 qt per 1000 miles to be "normal"). Other times it is because they inhale it through the PCV.

Sometimes (and this is probably most common) there is nothing wrong with the car but you're a competent driver on R comps and you're just simply going too hard for the stock unbaffled pan. I believe some 1st gen CTS-V owners hurt their cars this way. Heck, there have been blown engines in autocrossers (where we really don't have time to watch the gauges) because the stock pan starved the pump mid corner.

In any instance, if you notice the oil pressure is dipping precariously in corners, you'll have a chance to come off course BEFORE the dreaded it's - already - too - late - light springs to life. Even if you elect to not come off course you can still back off your pace and run within your mechanical limits BEFORE you hurt a bearing. And before you put the words in my mouth, I'm not saying that proper gauge placement is going to prevent all parts breakage. There is always the possibility of some catastrophic failure due to some heretofore undetected / undetectable condition when running the car hard.

There are more dual purpose (weekend funster / daily driver) cars out there than you may think. Note that I am NOT referring to the occasional drag racer here. I'm talking about HPDEs and time trials. Heck, I personally know a 20 year old college kid who tracks his daily driver Z3.
I'm not flaming you here, but wouldn't you be better served to put a dry sump system on ANY car you intend to race like that? That would be better than a gauge anyway. Because the g's pulled in cornering will starve some engines of oil anyway, and if in mid turn your oil pressure drops because of this, what are you going to do, dump the turn and go flying off the track? Like proper seatbelts and helmet and roll cage where needed, Dry Sump Oiling should be required more so than a gauge. Again, not flaming, but if you REALLY race like that, what good is the gauge going to do in the middle of a high speed, high G turn anyway?
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 05:30 AM
  #71  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Again, we are thinking that there's only going to be 1 version of Camaro.

But...while this may not be typical for a V6, base V8 Camaro...it most certainly IS just the type of duty cycle a Z28 MUST be equipped for...or miss its target demographic. A poor man's Vette.
We haven't yet seen a "Z28" interior, nor even a production interior, nor do we even know if there will be a "Z28" or what it will be called, or how equipped. Yet, that hasn't stopped some from chastising GM about it all

I've got to agree with Purple 92....
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 05:48 AM
  #72  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
not to mention, that Scott has all but said that the Camaro will have HUD. So I'm sure oil pressure will be available in some kind of redundancy in a good field of view. I'll put money on it.
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 07:20 AM
  #73  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by christianjax
not to mention, that Scott has all but said that the Camaro will have HUD. So I'm sure oil pressure will be available in some kind of redundancy in a good field of view. I'll put money on it.
Agreed. No one in the 'winkie club' here has openly confirmed it (I imagine that would get people in trouble), but there are a ton of informal comments here (+ other sites) and innuendo that make me believe the car will have a HUD. Plus - we do not yet know what info the DIC can display
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #74  
5thGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 547
Originally Posted by christianjax
I'if you REALLY race like that, what good is the gauge going to do in the middle of a high speed, high G turn anyway?
it tells you EXACTLY when to say "OH ****!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 08:51 AM
  #75  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast :
We haven't yet seen a "Z28" interior, nor even a production interior, nor do we even know if there will be a "Z28" or what it will be called, or how equipped. Yet, that hasn't stopped some from chastising GM about it all
Hmmmm...


Notice "Z28" striping?
Classic "Z28", tho it hasn't been spelled out, I would've thought it to be acedemic by now.
Add to the fact, that one model would'nt fit the wide gambit of "enthusiests to Joe Daily driver"....

Last edited by 90rocz; Feb 8, 2008 at 08:54 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.