Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #61  
GPZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 66
From: CORONA, SO-CAL
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Doesnt this stuff get a bit old after a while. Whatever board you are on is the fastest and best car on the planet. Didnt you guys know that?

Every car has good and bad points. Enjoy what ya drive and mod it so you can tell everybody its "BONE STOCK".
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #62  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Im still trying to get over the word...mudstain.

Other than slightly rhyming with mustang what the F*ck does it mean ?
How old are you...12?
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #63  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by Mikie
Im still trying to get over the word...mudstain.

Other than slightly rhyming with mustang what the F*ck does it mean ?
How old are you...12?

It's what little ricer children like to call it because their weenie size is threatened by them.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #64  
1quikZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

ha, this whole thread has got to be a joke, some of you actually think that mustangs, are faster than camaro's, Ill end with this, show me one year, that a mustang with an engine displacment that is comparable with a camaro has been faster.................nothing? Figured so.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #65  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Regardless if you think they are a joke or not. The thread started was beaten by one so whos the joke on?

You need to educate yourself on Mustangs a little more. You do know we dont all have 5.0s anymore right? Just lil ole 4.6 engines.

I want you to think about something real hard now.
My Mach 1 as of Yesterday at the track with just gears and slicks run a 7.94 @ 85 mph in the 1/8th. If you know your track times then tell me honestly that you still think mustangs...er mudstains are slow?
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #66  
00Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 368
From: Livonia, MI
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

I don't think they are slow, but most of them that I run across, unless super modded, aren't as fast as mine.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 09:25 PM
  #67  
1quikZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by Mikie
Regardless if you think they are a joke or not. The thread started was beaten by one so whos the joke on?

You need to educate yourself on Mustangs a little more. You do know we dont all have 5.0s anymore right? Just lil ole 4.6 engines.

I want you to think about something real hard now.
My Mach 1 as of Yesterday at the track with just gears and slicks run a 7.94 @ 85 mph in the 1/8th. If you know your track times then tell me honestly that you still think mustangs...er mudstains are slow?

Educate my self eh? How does engine tech a ford dealership sound, i work on em all day long bud, behind enemy lines if you will. And if i recall correctly I beleive it was an Lt1 the original poster had. which is a good 5 years (atleast) older technology. And he only lost because he missed a gear, as far as the legendary 5.O' yeah its been replaced by the 4.6 but atleast the 4.6 has got some *****. OK, whats next, how bout a comparison 4.6 to 4.8, Id be willling to bet that a well prepaired 4.8 say ls1 style would **** all over a 4.6. Finally if you think, your car could beat mine in a 1/4...........tell me where and when
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #68  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Am I supposed to be impressed that you work for Ford? Sorry bro , but that does not mean your educated to any times because you have yet to produce track times of your car. Yet you challenge me to a race?
Well let me tell you a little bit about myself. I have owned and still own...just dont keep em in the sig, more LT1s and LS1s than you can shake a stick at. I recently sold my low 10 second LS1 to a guy locally who wanted a trailer car. Not saying that my Mach is faster than anything you own...never did. However its no joke as you put it. In fact it is my first car in the 7s in the 1/8th mile with just a couple bolt ons. You can spout off whatever you want as it does not mean anything to me. Im at the track most thursday nights TNT and every other Sunday racing in brackets so I see your bragging kind come and go usually with a high 8 second slip...lol
Just ask anyone on this site about my cars just so you know Im not some FORD guy hanging out on a GM site to catch an arguement.

Since you have H/C done to the LT1 I would hope it would beat a lowly Mach 1 with only gears and flowmasters.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #69  
1quikZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

i really dont want to spend the time going back and forth, i havent run a 1/4 with my current set up, but with 10 year older tech, i hink h/c would even the playing field
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #70  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by 1quikZ
ha, this whole thread has got to be a joke, some of you actually think that mustangs, are faster than camaro's, Ill end with this, show me one year, that a mustang with an engine displacment that is comparable with a camaro has been faster.................nothing? Figured so.
Thank you for proving your ignorance.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:30 PM
  #71  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by 1quikZ
Educate my self eh? How does engine tech a ford dealership sound, i work on em all day long bud, behind enemy lines if you will. And if i recall correctly I beleive it was an Lt1 the original poster had. which is a good 5 years (atleast) older technology. And he only lost because he missed a gear, as far as the legendary 5.O' yeah its been replaced by the 4.6 but atleast the 4.6 has got some *****. OK, whats next, how bout a comparison 4.6 to 4.8, Id be willling to bet that a well prepaired 4.8 say ls1 style would **** all over a 4.6. Finally if you think, your car could beat mine in a 1/4...........tell me where and when
I can beat you in the 1/4 mile and all I have is a little AOD 5.0. Where is 131 motorsports park in West Michigan. When is in a month when they open, make up the trip and come on over, we'll see how bad that LT-1 of your is.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #72  
1quikZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by scott9050
Thank you for proving your ignorance.

**** off
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:33 PM
  #73  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by 1quikZ
**** off
I tell you what, come to the track at 131 and say that to me face to face. You sound like a 12 year old punk. Who gives a rats *** if you work as tech, I built my car and Mike does all of his work himself on his cars.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:34 PM
  #74  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by 1quikZ
i really dont want to spend the time going back and forth, i havent run a 1/4 with my current set up, but with 10 year older tech, i hink h/c would even the playing field
My tech is older than yours and my little 5.0 will whip your cars ***. Point? I'm betting like most Canadians I have met you don't have one, just shooting off at the mouth like a little ******. Typical newbie troll that the kills section likes to produce.

Last edited by scott9050; Mar 27, 2005 at 10:38 PM.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #75  
StylezZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 400
From: Buckingham, PA
Re: stupid f***ing mach 1's!!!

Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
WTF are you talkin about...no ones changing anything around...Im comparing recently released cars...not cars that came out in 2002... and Nobodys talkin about crappy 2 valve Gts here either (not including you Tim ) .....Its obvious your brand loyal...which is fine...but that doesnt change the fact that the new GT burries the LT1 in excelleration and is a way better overall car then a 4th gen period... Go pick up a copy of the new MT, they ran a new GT to a 13.5@103.... The LS1 and Cobra stock gap isnt that big? The fastest new Cobra time ive seen to date is a 12.4..fastest LS1 time Ive seen was a 12.9...I believe Snorman trapped 115 mph stock a week or 2 ago in his new Cobra...as opposed to your faster LS1 traps of 107-109...yea your right thats not very big
i witnessed a stock SS trap 110 mph at raceway park. He even had his hood popped and i talked with him a lil while. Besides my bone stock trap speed in my heavy *** vert was 109, i sure as hell hope someone can top that!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.