SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by Steve Y
Yes it is. It puts out more power, is more durable, is modded easier, cheaper and more reliably. I never said the Mach 1 is quicker stock for stock than an LS1. Take away 3 cylinders from an LS1 and what do you have? 

I guess I should have stated I was referring to the 2v heads. But just so you know, there is an after market package called "Wolf (something)" that puts a supercharger on the mach and takes it to over 400hp. I have seen nothing higher. What I said though is that dollar for dollar, the ls1 will be much faster.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by Steve Y
The LS6 and the '03 Cobra motor are better than the LS1 and they don't say much about them. They must have low standards.
Kind of like the white trash dude that looks at a skinny, drugged out crooked toothed ***** and thinks she's hot.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
first of all,the 03 cobra motor is no different than a 01 cobra motor except it has a supercharger.secondly the z28 was faster than the cobra in the early 4th gen.i got road test comparisons
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
first of all,the 03 cobra motor is no different than a 01 cobra motor except it has a supercharger.secondly the z28 was faster than the cobra in the early 4th gen.i got road test comparisons
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by Black00SS
I could have sworn that it was you telling everyone in an earlier post how you murder LS1's at the drag strip out of the hole by 4-5 car lengths (something about 4000 rpm launches on drag radials), but heaven forbid you powershift, might break something
.
Also, i never seemed to have any trouble with a 93 cobra in my old 95 Z28, as a matter of fact i didnt have too much trouble with the 96-98 cobra crowd either. Maybe i was just a great driver, and every one of the numerous cars i raced were ****ty drivers.
"limited production" Cobra R's dont hold a candle to the "limited production" ZL1's, so why dont we talk about regular production cars, instead of "limited production" cars.
I just wonder to myself sometimes, where all these
ungodly fast
Mach 1's are at in my area. They are all pretty much a walk in the park every time i run one. Go ahead, my flame suit is on, its the truth.
Mach 1 this 03 Cobra that, here's a quarter, call someone who cares. I am more then happy with my car, the mustangs just dont impress me.
.Also, i never seemed to have any trouble with a 93 cobra in my old 95 Z28, as a matter of fact i didnt have too much trouble with the 96-98 cobra crowd either. Maybe i was just a great driver, and every one of the numerous cars i raced were ****ty drivers.
"limited production" Cobra R's dont hold a candle to the "limited production" ZL1's, so why dont we talk about regular production cars, instead of "limited production" cars.
I just wonder to myself sometimes, where all these
ungodly fast
Mach 1's are at in my area. They are all pretty much a walk in the park every time i run one. Go ahead, my flame suit is on, its the truth. Mach 1 this 03 Cobra that, here's a quarter, call someone who cares. I am more then happy with my car, the mustangs just dont impress me.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
first of all,the 03 cobra motor is no different than a 01 cobra motor except it has a supercharger.secondly the z28 was faster than the cobra in the early 4th gen.i got road test comparisons
The '03 and '01 Cobra motors are way different. Iron block in the '03, alum. block in the '01. Different heads, cams, pistons, rods, crank?, etc. They vary a lot, besides the supercharger. The Z28 was not faster than the Cobra in '96 and '97.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by techie36
Those LS1's that trapped 108-109 "bone stock" were the 2000-2002's, show me a first or 2nd year LS1 with those numbers...give the mach 1 more than a few months in production to pull out some impressive numbers
The first year production models aren't even all out yet. 
The first year production models aren't even all out yet. 
I've gone 13.20's @ 108 in my 1998 with a catback and street tires.
12.88 @ 106 with lid, K&N, & catback on street tires.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by Steve Y
The Z28 was not faster than the Cobra in '96 and '97.
I dont know man, magazine times i think for Lt1 Z28s were low 14s to high 13s. What were the cobras running in 1997?
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by techie36
The machs are faster than N/A cobras...lighter block, aluminum instead of forged. So yeah...I haven't seen any machs hit high 12's yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do since I have seen very low 13's out of them so far.
I've seen 13.20's out of a MOSTLY stock mach 1 (it's very hard to find a mustang without exhaust mods).
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by KamaroL98
But then again, not every LS1 runs as good. Mabey due to driver or its just dont run good. I drove a buddies 2002 SS and it didnt feel like it pulled hard at all compared to alot of other LS1s. We ran him with another stock LS1 and he got walked pretty good. So i guess a good strong running mach 1 could pull an LS1 like that.
.
.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
My mods? I dont have any. I already raced an 03 convertible Cobra, didnt impress me, went with my buddy to the strip last week, seen about 4 03's (hardtops) running 13.0's to 13.3's trapping 105-107, didnt impress me. I am by no means saying that the Cobra's/Mach's are slow, i am saying they dont impress me. What does impress me? Z06's running low 12's, and now someone clicking off a high 11 second pass with an 04 BONE STOCK!!. No power adder, no bitching about the IRS (common among 03 cobra owners). I also never said my 95 Z28 was faster then a 96-97-98 cobra, i simply stated that the numerous 96-97-98 Cobra's that i ran against were not a problem to beat. On a side note the 96-97 z28 had 285 hp, 10 more then mine due to the dual cats, and there was also an SS, WS6, and firehawk in 96-97 too which are faster then the 96-97-98 Cobra's stock for stock. Then if you got a 97 SS with an LT4, well then they were quite a bit faster then a cobra if i remember correctly. So lets compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges.
96 SS is faster then a 96 cobra
96 WS6 is faster then a 96 cobra
96 firehawk is faster then a 96 cobra
same scenario for 97 with one exception
97 LT4 SS is one hell of a lot faster then a 97 Cobra
96 Z28 to 96 GT----wow
97 z28 to 97 GT----wow
Oh by the way, i have an old 5.0 mustangs and fast fords mag here (bought it because i was considering a mustang, drove a 01 cobra, and my 00 SS, and really didnt have to think about it much more). Its the issue where they race the 03 Cobra vs The 03 Mach with the vortec on it. Here we go
03 Cobra specs
319 HP @6400 RPMs rear wheel
309 FT LBS @3800 RPMS rear wheel
1/4 mile :13.09@110.82 0-60 4.9 seconds
The mach ran the 1/4 in 11.96@121.16 0-60 in 3.88 seconds.
I believe the same mag (or one of those mustang mags) Ran an 02SS 12.9 at 109 something. Like i said the 03's dont impress me.
96 SS is faster then a 96 cobra
96 WS6 is faster then a 96 cobra
96 firehawk is faster then a 96 cobra
same scenario for 97 with one exception
97 LT4 SS is one hell of a lot faster then a 97 Cobra
96 Z28 to 96 GT----wow
97 z28 to 97 GT----wow
Oh by the way, i have an old 5.0 mustangs and fast fords mag here (bought it because i was considering a mustang, drove a 01 cobra, and my 00 SS, and really didnt have to think about it much more). Its the issue where they race the 03 Cobra vs The 03 Mach with the vortec on it. Here we go
03 Cobra specs
319 HP @6400 RPMs rear wheel
309 FT LBS @3800 RPMS rear wheel
1/4 mile :13.09@110.82 0-60 4.9 seconds
The mach ran the 1/4 in 11.96@121.16 0-60 in 3.88 seconds.
I believe the same mag (or one of those mustang mags) Ran an 02SS 12.9 at 109 something. Like i said the 03's dont impress me.
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video
Originally Posted by Black00SS
My mods? I dont have any.
I already raced an 03 convertible Cobra, didnt impress me, went with my buddy to the strip last week, seen about 4 03's (hardtops) running 13.0's to 13.3's trapping 105-107, didnt impress me. I am by no means saying that the Cobra's/Mach's are slow, i am saying they dont impress me.
What does impress me? Z06's running low 12's, and now someone clicking off a high 11 second pass with an 04 BONE STOCK!!.
No power adder, no bitching about the IRS (common among 03 cobra owners).
I also never said my 95 Z28 was faster then a 96-97-98 cobra, i simply stated that the numerous 96-97-98 Cobra's that i ran against were not a problem to beat.
So what did your 95Z run? As an FYI, my 98 Cobra went 13.6 @ 104 mph in 100% bone stock trim - including the factory air filter. Ok, I had Mobil 1 oil. Some people consider that a mod.
On a side note the 96-97 z28 had 285 hp, 10 more then mine due to the dual cats, and there was also an SS, WS6, and firehawk in 96-97 too which are faster then the 96-97-98 Cobra's stock for stock.
Then if you got a 97 SS with an LT4, well then they were quite a bit faster then a cobra if i remember correctly.
So lets compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges.
96 SS is faster then a 96 cobra
96 WS6 is faster then a 96 cobra
96 WS6 is faster then a 96 cobra
96 firehawk is faster then a 96 cobra
same scenario for 97 with one exception
97 LT4 SS is one hell of a lot faster then a 97 Cobra
97 LT4 SS is one hell of a lot faster then a 97 Cobra
96 Z28 to 96 GT----wow
97 z28 to 97 GT----wow
97 z28 to 97 GT----wow
Oh by the way, i have an old 5.0 mustangs and fast fords mag here (bought it because i was considering a mustang, drove a 01 cobra, and my 00 SS, and really didnt have to think about it much more). Its the issue where they race the 03 Cobra vs The 03 Mach with the vortec on it.
Anyways....
Here we go
03 Cobra specs
319 HP @6400 RPMs rear wheel
309 FT LBS @3800 RPMS rear wheel
03 Cobra specs
319 HP @6400 RPMs rear wheel
309 FT LBS @3800 RPMS rear wheel
1/4 mile :13.09@110.82 0-60 4.9 seconds
The mach ran the 1/4 in 11.96@121.16 0-60 in 3.88 seconds.
I believe the same mag (or one of those mustang mags) Ran an 02SS 12.9 at 109 something. Like i said the 03's dont impress me.


