Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

98z vs. 03 cobra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #91  
TransAmGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 694
From: Milledgeville, Ga USA
I race a '03 Cobra the other day...he walked pretty good after 1st gear! It's bone stock! And he pulls from my friends '02 ZO6 from a 70 roll and the vette doesn't catch back up till well over 100! And the guy with the vette is a badass driver so there is no driver error! (he runs 12.0xx @ 115 in his BONE STOCK ZO6) That cobra is fast and that's all there is to it!
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #92  
My95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 258
From: Minnesota
good runs
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 12:24 AM
  #93  
redcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 12
From: huntington beach
Cool

the miracle of a supercharged 4.6L
http://www.strictlypro.com/dyno%20vi...%20@%20142.WMV

Last edited by redcamaro; Mar 25, 2004 at 12:26 AM.
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 08:11 AM
  #94  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by redcamaro
the miracle of a supercharged 4.6L
http://www.strictlypro.com/dyno%20vi...%20@%20142.WMV
Alot more there then just a supercharger . That thing just sounds plain scary .
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 10:31 AM
  #95  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Thx. I think that's a common misconception. Although in this topic, I think the area under the curve goes to the LS1 not so much just because the Cobra is blown, but because the Cobra is a blown 4.6 DOCH. If you put that same blower on the 5.7 ohv Ls1 (with the same compression as the 4.6), it'll dominate the 4.6. My Vette in the comparison I made was blown, but had a power band very much like an n/a car (took a lot of tuning to get there)....whereas the Supras band looked like pike's peak

Jason
Originally posted by robb4964
Man , I got to hand it to ya . You did a good job of explaining this . This is exactly what I was going to say . I try to explain this to people ALL OF THE TIME and its as if the just cant understand it . . The way the power is delivered and the duration of the power thrue the RPM's has alot to do with the trap speeds . A car with a blower has power spikes as to where a car that makse the same power with out one has a more steady apllication of power . More power thrue the entire RPM range instead of some power to a ton of power. So a car with less max HP can trap higher then a blower car for the simple fact that it can provide a steady line of High power and torque .Not just at high RPM's .

Last edited by yellavette; Mar 25, 2004 at 10:35 AM.
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 08:08 PM
  #96  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally posted by yellavette
Thx. I think that's a common misconception. Although in this topic, I think the area under the curve goes to the LS1.
I dont buy this at all, heres some dyno's of some stock cars of each of friends of mine:
-------------------LS1------------------03 Cobra-------
RPM HP TQ HP TQ
2000 107 280 115 301
2200 119 285 130 310
2400 133 291 146 319
2600 147 297 161 326
2800 159 299 178 333
3000 171 300 195 341
3200 184 302 211 346
3400 195 301 225 348
3600 209 305 240 350
3800 224 309 254 351
4000 238 313 268 352
4200 254 317 281 351
4400 266 318 293 350
4600 279 318 305 348
4800 289 316 313 343
5000 297 312 326 342
5200 302 305 337 340
5400 299 291 348 338
5600 302 283 355 333
5800 301 273 361 327
6000 299 262 364 319
6200 293 248 366 310
6300** na na 362 302

i dont see where it wins "under the curve" anywhere.
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #97  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Of course the Cobra wins the "area under the curve" battle.....it's got 390 hp compared to a stock LS1. We're talking about equal hp cars. Compare it's dyno to a LS1 with 390 hp or a LS6 and you'll get the idea. What's funny is that my lil turbo 6 with 322 rwhp makes more rear wheel torqe than that Cobra!....although it's band isn't as broad.

Jason
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #98  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by yellavette
Of course the Cobra wins the "area under the curve" battle.....it's got 390 hp compared to a stock LS1. We're talking about equal hp cars. Compare it's dyno to a LS1 with 390 hp or a LS6 and you'll get the idea.
I doubt it. Roots blowers are great at making tons of power "under the curve."
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #99  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Find a dyno of a 390 hp ls1 and compare....or come up with another explanation why one car's consistantly faster than the other with equal hp. I said I haven't seen a dyno of the ls1, but based on it's superior quarter mile performance, area under the curve is a logical explanation....along with weight and gearing.

Jason
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #100  
redcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 12
From: huntington beach
Originally posted by yellavette
Of course the Cobra wins the "area under the curve" battle.....it's got 390 hp compared to a stock LS1. We're talking about equal hp cars. Compare it's dyno to a LS1 with 390 hp or a LS6 and you'll get the idea. What's funny is that my lil turbo 6 with 322 rwhp makes more rear wheel torqe than that Cobra!....although it's band isn't as broad.

Jason
here it is:
your 390rwhp ls1,this are the mods

2002 Z28 HardTop M6
Mods: LID(K&N), Hooker Catback with a Cutout at the I pipe, FLP Long Tube headers, Mcloed Kevlar/Organic, 160 stat, FM7 114 Futral Cam (224/230 .587 .593 114),26918 Springs, Titanum Retainers, Pushrods.
Accessories: PRO 5.0 shifter, LS1 Edit, Auto Tap EFI V5 Live, ZR1 Wheels, Nittos 315's rear, 275 Fronts.
Suspension: Brembo rotors with HP plus pads, Eibach springs (Pro Kit), Bilsten shocks, BMR Torque Arm, LG Strut tower brace, LG SFC's, LG LCA's, LG sways, LG panhard rod.
Dynos with mods:
Stock: 292rwhp 314rwtq
LM+LID: 325rwhp 336rwtq
LM+LID+ FLP: 348RWHP 363RWTQ
LID+LM+FLP(Cats)+ FM7 Cam:378rwhp 365rwtq
LID+Hooker+FLP(ORP)+FM7Cam: 383rwhp 377rwtq
LID+Cutout+FLP(ORP)+ FM7Cam: 392rwhp 382rwtq



now, take a look at the cobra
mods:
pulley,tune,exhaust, cai. classic graph.



btw, i don't think your lil v6 put more torque than a terminator


the 03 cobra would win base on price/performance

Last edited by redcamaro; Mar 26, 2004 at 12:55 AM.
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 02:54 AM
  #101  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
so you guys want to compare a highly modded LS1 to a basically stock Cobra??
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 07:07 AM
  #102  
jthomas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 133
From: Roanoke, VA
Originally posted by MauriSSio
so you guys want to compare a highly modded LS1 to a basically stock Cobra??
i'm pretty sure the reasoning was to compare area under the curve of a boosted v8 with roughly the same peak hp vs a n/a one. and a pullied/tuned/exhaust/cai cobra ISN'T basically stock. i'm sure we are all aware of what these mods do for a '03+ coba.
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #103  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by MauriSSio
so you guys want to compare a highly modded LS1 to a basically stock Cobra??
What do you consider highly modded ? A cam , lid , and headers ? Thats not highly modded !
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 08:21 AM
  #104  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by redcamaro

LID+Cutout+FLP(ORP)+ FM7Cam: 392rwhp 382rwtq



now, take a look at the cobra
mods:
pulley,tune,exhaust, cai. classic graph.



btw, i don't think your lil v6 put more torque than a terminator


the 03 cobra would win base on price/performance
Why didnt you use a stock cobra ? instead of a pulley,tune,exhaust, cai Cobra ? Yellow vette was talking about the graph with 2 engines with the SAME hp . A cobra wwith thois mods has more HP obviously . You are using a 450HP dyno vs a 390 HP dyno . A blower VCobra with tuning , Cai , exhaust, and whatever VS a LS1 with a cam and headers .

We all know the Cobra has More HP . Thatsa point that dont need to be made . Well , I take that back , there are still a few out there that refuse to aknowledge its great power and potential .

BTW , yellowvette , what kind of times is the 300 putting down . One of my best friends had a 300ZTT that dynoed 370 to the wheels and it would not and could not break a 13.2 ...Have no clue why ! It ran fine ." It was an auto though "

Last edited by robb4964; Mar 26, 2004 at 08:32 AM.
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 08:31 AM
  #105  
LeadSled1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
It seems to be it is the area under the curve.

MaruiSSio, we all know that the Cobra comes with more HP. We were trying to figure out why a LS1 with similar peak RWHP seems to trap/ET better. No matter if it is 450rwhp or 360rwhp.

I took MaruiSSio's numbers above and compared them to a 362rwhp Firehawk with the following mods:

-Ported Throttle Body
-Descreened MAF
-MSD Wires
-NGK Plugs
-QTP Stainless Headers
-QTP Merge Collectors
-QuickTime Electric Cutout
-QTP Off-road Y-pipe
-Speed Inc Dynotune




-------LS1---03 Cobra-------
RPM HP HP Dif
3000 190 195 -5
3400 235 225 +10
4000 275 268 +7
4400 315 293 +22
5000 350 326 +24
5400 360 348 +12
6000 355 364 -9
6200 350 366 -16
6300*** 362


Interesting numbers. As the stock LS1 cam dies off earlier the Cobra continues to make power. I'll try to find a similar rwhp dyno with a cam that extends the RPM range.



This is using the following dyno. The differences in the red and blue line are the tuning:




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.