03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Yeh masters as in im 3 years ahead, and my ls1 T/a dynoed 289/319, I love ls1s im not bashing them...only the mustang, and I know the ss has the same engine as the z28 but they have alittle more power,, mach 1s just arent all that great
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Just thinking How I did when I was fourteen, I came up with this conclusion. The poster states 96' LT1s had 285 rated hp. He says his car dynoed 307 With just the intake. If I remember correctly, Moroso claimed a 22hp gain for their intake. 285+22=307. Sounds like someone does'nt know the difference between flywheel hp and rearwheel hp. And I have to disagree, Mach 1s are great, they put the good motor with the un-gay rearend. P.S. I think STIs are garbage, and look like the B9 Tribeca.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by OrbitalChris
My car dynoed 307rwhp with my intake only
That is WAY above the typical LT1 power output.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by OrbitalChris
And LS1s are 305 unless you have an SS or WS6 or something, and 96 LT1s were 285...my masters tells me 305-285=20, but hey what do I know
'98-'00 SS/WS6: 320
'01-'02 Z28/TA: 310
'01-'02 SS/WS6: 325
There was a cam change and they switched to the LS6 intake manifold for the '01 and '02 cars, hence the 5hp increase.
They are all underrated, though, in reality making 340-350 horsepower at the flywheel.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
The two strongest stock LS1's I have seen were both 2002 SS's...
First one was a M6 with 700 miles on it. He ran 13.2@112 mph and could not believe it...so he wanted to see how much it would dyno...it made 349/350 std on my bud's Dynojet. I scoured this car for mods and it was untouched...the baddest virgin LS1 I have ever seen.
The second one was an automatic with around 3000 miles on it. It put down 329/350 std and with cheap hyper-tech tune, it put down 342/360 std.
On a side note...I have seen a few Mach 1's dyno...mid 280's/310's stock std and saw one dyno 293/315 std stock.
First one was a M6 with 700 miles on it. He ran 13.2@112 mph and could not believe it...so he wanted to see how much it would dyno...it made 349/350 std on my bud's Dynojet. I scoured this car for mods and it was untouched...the baddest virgin LS1 I have ever seen.
The second one was an automatic with around 3000 miles on it. It put down 329/350 std and with cheap hyper-tech tune, it put down 342/360 std.
On a side note...I have seen a few Mach 1's dyno...mid 280's/310's stock std and saw one dyno 293/315 std stock.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by OrbitalChris
mach 1s just arent all that great
Im not gonna flame ya for this statement, Im just gonna say go spend sometime at the track. Im a DIE HARD LS1 guy but I have seen enough mach's run to respect the car. They run really good.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by chicken man
Thats funny that you say that,I was on my way home tonight and I stopped at KFC,one of the employees that was there insisted that my cobra was a regular stang and that the cobra emblems were put on.I laughed my *** off and asked him to lay off the crack,that told him it was a real terminator.The guy cracked me up.I actually drove beside a Z28 Lt1 on the way home also but he wouldnt play,he was a older guy and probably thought I was stupid for trying. Oh well
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by CANTONRACER
The two strongest stock LS1's I have seen were both 2002 SS's...
First one was a M6 with 700 miles on it. He ran 13.2@112 mph and could not believe it...so he wanted to see how much it would dyno...it made 349/350 std on my bud's Dynojet. I scoured this car for mods and it was untouched...the baddest virgin LS1 I have ever seen.
The second one was an automatic with around 3000 miles on it. It put down 329/350 std and with cheap hyper-tech tune, it put down 342/360 std.
On a side note...I have seen a few Mach 1's dyno...mid 280's/310's stock std and saw one dyno 293/315 std stock.
First one was a M6 with 700 miles on it. He ran 13.2@112 mph and could not believe it...so he wanted to see how much it would dyno...it made 349/350 std on my bud's Dynojet. I scoured this car for mods and it was untouched...the baddest virgin LS1 I have ever seen.
The second one was an automatic with around 3000 miles on it. It put down 329/350 std and with cheap hyper-tech tune, it put down 342/360 std.
On a side note...I have seen a few Mach 1's dyno...mid 280's/310's stock std and saw one dyno 293/315 std stock.
That is unreal. Easily the highest dynoing LS1 cars I have ever heard of.
The highest Mach I have ever heard of dynoing was 293 as well. But I believe it was SAE corrected, not STD.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by robb4964
Im not gonna flame ya for this statement, Im just gonna say go spend sometime at the track. Im a DIE HARD LS1 guy but I have seen enough mach's run to respect the car. They run really good.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by CANTONRACER
The two strongest stock LS1's I have seen were both 2002 SS's...
First one was a M6 with 700 miles on it. He ran 13.2@112 mph and could not believe it...so he wanted to see how much it would dyno...it made 349/350 std on my bud's Dynojet. I scoured this car for mods and it was untouched...the baddest virgin LS1 I have ever seen.
The second one was an automatic with around 3000 miles on it. It put down 329/350 std and with cheap hyper-tech tune, it put down 342/360 std.
On a side note...I have seen a few Mach 1's dyno...mid 280's/310's stock std and saw one dyno 293/315 std stock.
First one was a M6 with 700 miles on it. He ran 13.2@112 mph and could not believe it...so he wanted to see how much it would dyno...it made 349/350 std on my bud's Dynojet. I scoured this car for mods and it was untouched...the baddest virgin LS1 I have ever seen.
The second one was an automatic with around 3000 miles on it. It put down 329/350 std and with cheap hyper-tech tune, it put down 342/360 std.
On a side note...I have seen a few Mach 1's dyno...mid 280's/310's stock std and saw one dyno 293/315 std stock.
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by robb4964
Are you sure it didnt have a cheater cam in it
Re: 03' Mach 1 vs. My 96'Z
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
That's what I was thinking too. It's REALLY hard to tell if an engine has an aftermarket cam by looking at it.


