LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

which would be a better set up for me NA or S/C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 06:34 AM
  #1  
GRNcamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 662
From: albany, ny
which would be a better set up for me NA or S/C

im building a new motor for my camaro and i cant make up my mind on what i want to do.

i want to build a camaro with 450-500 rwhp, the money doesn't truly bother me i just have to stretch it out a little longer if it costs more. i want the car to be able to take the car to the track on weekends and during the week maybe take it for a cruise or to work once and while. it will really only be a toy i will never use it for a dd that what i bought the cobalt for but i want to be able to take it out for a cruise on the streets occasionally and the street manners can be a little ruff .


what im thinking about doing is either a na 383

or a supercharged 383.


would i be able to archive 450-500rwhp na on a 95 lt1?
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 07:55 AM
  #2  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
You should concentrate on a track goal for performance numbers and use the dyno as a tuning tool...

A car pushing 450 rwhp should be trapping 123-125 MPH... not something commonly seen on these boards from an N/A LT1 unfortunately... although it can, and has been done quite a few times.
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #3  
GRNcamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 662
From: albany, ny
i dont want to try and do do something that cant be done i just want to try and get the car to a certain point. i want to build a mid 10 to low 11 second car maybe im thinking i will need more hp then i do then.

i dont want to be gutting the car to get there though.

to me the best part about this is i can drive the car while im doing this becuase i bought a whole nother drive train to do it to.
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
I'd say you're better off runnin a blown 355 for the goal you stated. If you buy a forged crank at all yo have no reason not to do a 383 because theres no reason not to. In either case i'd build it with a 5.7 or a 5.85 rod to leave plenty of meat in the piston for the dish and to have lots of room to move the rings down.

n/a lt1's really seem to be hit or miss with rwhp numbers. so far I still dont have a clue why theres such a huge variation, if its tuning or assembly or what, but if you've built a few motors and they have run hard, the odds are that your engine will run hard.

but for my money if i'm not driving it every day a forged short block with a blower on it will run harder than n/a every day of the week. bottom line is it costs a TON of money to break 500rwhp n/a with an lt1, while that seems common with boosted lt's.
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
I'de go with a turbo setup personally. But If that isn't an option a nice blower setup would still be better than n/a. 600rwhp on a mild setup shouldn't be hard to achieve at all.
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #6  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,307
From: Haverhill MA
i would go N/A and then do like a 100 shot... nitrous runs good in any weather... thats the only reason why i lean towards nitrous
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
z28leno
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Mar 12, 2015 07:42 AM
FredM
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Mar 6, 2015 03:04 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 23, 2015 01:13 PM
jrp4uc
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
43
Sep 18, 2002 08:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.