LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Who Wants a MSD Replacement for the Opticrap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #211  
Bandit97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 51
From: Bedford TX
im in, i am tired of all the opti problems. cody bennett
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 01:44 PM
  #212  
ScottZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 127
From: Akron Ohio
Evidently, MSD doesn't believe the buyer at Summit Racing or the people on this board that there are people who want them to produce this product. I have sent copies of this thread to them on several occasions, and for the past two years I've been hearing "we're looking into it".

I think what they mean to say is "stop calling, we don't care". I would recommend purchasing the dynotech piece at this point. I have no personal experience with it, but I think we'll all be sh#tting in our Depends before they make a decision. I truly am sorry, and I honestly believed that if Summit Racing told MSD that we want to buy this product, they would listen.

I can't believe that they produce a distributor for the Flat Head Ford, but refuse to even return a phone call about the LT1.

I will continue to persue other alternatives. Perhaps it is time to talk to Accel or Mallory and see if they want to pick up ball and run with it.

I'll keep ya posted on what I find. Thanks for the interest, and please continue.

Scott
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #213  
Waitin4aSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 73
From: Central Florida
Put me down for one if it ever came out.
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 03:35 PM
  #214  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
I would keep pushing them for it. It is like that movie Shawshank Redemtion when he keeps sending letters to the state until they give him some money and books then he says that he will send 2 letters everyday until they end up giving him what he wants.
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 03:40 PM
  #215  
95BlackTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 740
From: Gainesville, FL
IM in!
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 04:23 PM
  #216  
carlos64030's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 955
Hey MSD...BUILD IT, AND WE WILL COME! I'm in if this ever happens.
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 04:49 PM
  #217  
raceryan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 176
From: Lexington Park, MD
I'd get in on it too.
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 06:21 PM
  #218  
stlws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 113
hate to say it maybe they are smart enough not to make a product that sits under the water pump but i bet they could do something else
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 06:47 PM
  #219  
turbo_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,515
From: Kansas
the simple fact remains... THERE IS NO DEMAND!

there are what 200 replies to this thread and a lot of them are from the same people so conservatively there are about 150 people interested.

MSD realizes that what needs to be done is not a new improved opti but one that is completely different from the GM unit and the Dynatech. this would mean the price would not be appealing to 99% of everyone who owns an LT1. the Dynatech is basically an improved opti and its $600 so lets say MSD devised a way to get an 8 coil setup to work with the stock PCM.. that would be in the $1000 range easy.

i really dont see what the big deal is anyway. most optis last 60,000 miles easy. replace it once at a cost of $200 or so if you do it yourself and be done with it. and there again... only those serious about LT1s would purchase an MSD distributor and then i doubt half of them are competant enough to install it themselfs so they have a shop do it for them. i am just being a realist here guys... either go opti or go LS1.
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #220  
Don 97 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,041
From: Robinson, IL
Originally posted by turbo_Z
i am just being a realist here guys... either go opti or go LS1.
Or get the DynaSpark!
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:44 PM
  #221  
mrxz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
I if it were a as good as or better product at a competitive price you bet
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 09:30 PM
  #222  
Don 97 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,041
From: Robinson, IL
Originally posted by mrxz28
I if it were a as good as or better product at a competitive price you bet
Well, the DynaSpark is clearly a better product, but about the price
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:04 PM
  #223  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally posted by turbo_Z
the simple fact remains... THERE IS NO DEMAND!

there are what 200 replies to this thread and a lot of them are from the same people so conservatively there are about 150 people interested.

MSD realizes that what needs to be done is not a new improved opti but one that is completely different from the GM unit and the Dynatech. this would mean the price would not be appealing to 99% of everyone who owns an LT1. the Dynatech is basically an improved opti and its $600 so lets say MSD devised a way to get an 8 coil setup to work with the stock PCM.. that would be in the $1000 range easy.

i really dont see what the big deal is anyway. most optis last 60,000 miles easy. replace it once at a cost of $200 or so if you do it yourself and be done with it. and there again... only those serious about LT1s would purchase an MSD distributor and then i doubt half of them are competant enough to install it themselfs so they have a shop do it for them. i am just being a realist here guys... either go opti or go LS1.
I wonder how many people buy a distributor for a Flathead Ford? I think one of the biggest things against the LT1 is that the opti is so different from any other distributor, so the R&D costs would be a lot more I would think.
Old Aug 27, 2003 | 12:26 AM
  #224  
johnny o's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 159
From: Cambridge, Ontario, CANADA
I'm in if something decent is made for a reasonable price. The DynaSpark seems like a good unit but seems expensive for what it is. Maybe it is time to try other companies?
Old Aug 27, 2003 | 11:42 AM
  #225  
SloMofo's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,029
From: NJ
Fockers!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.