LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Whats rods/Pistons do you like?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #1  
mdacton's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Whats rods/Pistons do you like?

What is a good light piston and a matching rod that will be good for hi rpm and not break the bank?

I'm just curious what most people like.....
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #2  
Boosted_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 690
From: St. Charles, IL
For an NA motor?
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #3  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Scat has some decent cap screw type rods that seem to be working well and it is hard to go wrong with a Mahle piston. Neither of these is stunningly light but both offer a good value.
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #4  
mdacton's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by Boosted_Z28
For an NA motor?
Yes. Hi compression NA.
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #5  
Car Enthusiast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 232
From: Columbus, Ohio
how high are you thinking about revving

i didn't think the rods and pistons were the weak point in high rpm application
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #6  
mdacton's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by Car Enthusiast
how high are you thinking about revving

i didn't think the rods and pistons were the weak point in high rpm application
7500 or so
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #7  
MachinistOne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,001
From: Bay Area, CA
I use Manley rods in pretty much everything. What is the expected hp number?
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 04:51 AM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Rods: Manley, Lunati, Oliver, Dyers. Or if you are willing to buy an import the only one I would buy are the Compstar from Callies. Pistons: JE/SRP, Mahle, Ross, Diamond, Wiseco.

Rich
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #9  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted by Car Enthusiast
how high are you thinking about revving

i didn't think the rods and pistons were the weak point in high rpm application
For an LT1 the pistons and rods most definetely are the rpm weak points. From what I have seen and read I would trust the stock crank much further than either other piece.
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #10  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
The difference I have found in a offshore rod and a USA rod is the quality of the finishing. Just opened up the small end of a set of Eagles .0004" to get the pin fit correct for the application, but you have to chamfer the pin ends before you even get to checking the clearance to start. I also like to surface plate sand the flats on the big ends where the 2 rods touch. Things that you get on a Carrillo rod for 5 times the money, that take a few hours to do. A Eagle, Scat can take a good amount of power but like anything you need to make sure your ducks are in a row. "Big Daddy" Dwane Guthridge is running 7's in a Turbo SBF Drag Radial Car with Eagle Parts in it, and BES ran a lightweight SBC rod in a BBC with a pretty long stroke and 800+hp in the Engine Masters and normally does run them in all his entries.

Talk to any good engine builder who is old, say someone like Joe Sherman and he'll tell you about the good old days of stock rods that they prepped correctly and stood up to 8000+rpm and 600+hp levels. Parts that by comparison have a weaker design than the Carrillo H-Beam offshoots. Most times I see people spend WAY too much money on connecting rods that they just never need. I hate seeing a motor with not enough money in the valvetrain, intake or heads running a set of $1200 Olivers in it, especially in OEM blocks that are weaker than the rods.

I will say that Callies new Compstar Rods and Cranks are super nices pieces, they are a little more costly than a Eagle, but their is a reason. A Compstar crank needs less prep than a Eagle crank to get it where you need it.

99.5% of the time a rod failure is the builders fault, because he didn't check and set clearances or install them properly.

As for pistons, this is where you really find power and the difference between good any bad. Right now I have to say that for shelf parts a Mahle Pro Pack is nice for a street/strip cost effective engine build. For custom stuff I really like Wiesco, mainly because I get the service I need and parts built exactly how I need them to very good tolerances. If you are building a custom motor then they are a great choice. I've also used Diamond and JE in the past and Diamond is still a good choice, they seem to work well for Greg Anderson and Jason Line. I just don't like to work with the California companies because they are farther away, and have higher prices for the same level of quality.

Bret
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #11  
mdacton's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Bret you bring up a point I was interested in but have found little info on.

I have 2 people that have done my maching work in the past....Both praise the stock LT1 rod up and down. One does 90% circle track stuff, he checked and preeped my rods last time I freshened my motr and I was shifting@ 7,000

The other guy does alot of stock class motors and he said there is no need for another rod and the stock pistons are pretty tuff as well. His latest car was sporting stock rods the he prepped and they are shifting the car at 8k and its held together all season so far. So I take it prep is the key to making the stock rods work in a race engine?

I agree with you on the valve train, people skimp....I have done it myself in the past.....never again will I try to save one cent on anything valvetrain related
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #12  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Yes, prep is most of what matters on rods. As for pistons, accuracy in manufacturing is what matters. Most of it a engine builder can't measure but he can once he puts it on the dyno.

Bret
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 11:02 AM
  #13  
Severous01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,367
From: Burlington, NJ
Originally Posted by mdacton
I agree with you on the valve train, people skimp....I have done it myself in the past.....never again will I try to save one cent on anything valvetrain related
i'm with you on this one too...

my valvetrain failed because my engien builder skimped my parts off and re-used stock hardware. i put on 1.6 rockers and 2k miles later i'm dropping a valve. now, not only did i lose the rockers i had just installed and paid 300 bucks for, but i also lost my head and the engine due to his laziness and his theft.

any way. comp cams sells COMPLETE kits including springs, cam, lifters, rockers, guides, seals, retainers, and timing chain/gears all in a package. and you'll get it cheaper than if you ordered everything seperately. plus, if you use the whole package they can warrant the product.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sandman2100
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 17, 2013 12:22 PM
Bad AZz Z28
Parts For Sale
32
Jul 29, 2011 01:34 AM
LT1PoloGreenSS
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Mar 5, 2009 07:48 PM
MikeSS97
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
May 6, 2006 12:15 AM
Badmire68
Parts For Sale
11
Jan 12, 2005 05:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.