LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

what does it takes to beat an LS1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 03:31 AM
  #1  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
what does it takes to beat an LS1?

My friend owns a 2000 trans-am(not the ram air) i think stock its 305 horses,auto,he only has a K&N air filter in it,he says his car will beat the crap out of mine.Mine its a 97z28,6M,SLP CAI,airfoil,LT4 km,1.5 drop,and cutout.What else should i get done to my car to win this race?what times you guys think we run?
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #2  
69gto96z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,146
From: Denton/Rockwall, TX
I am full bolt ons, and near stock LS1s are no prob, even off the bottle.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #3  
afr lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
From: long island
Throw some headers on there and kick his butt.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #4  
F(ast)-body's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 234
From: Greater West Palm Beach, FL
Originally Posted by clcam97
My friend owns a 2000 trans-am(not the ram air) i think stock its 305 horses,auto,he only has a K&N air filter in it,he says his car will beat the crap out of mine.Mine its a 97z28,6M,SLP CAI,airfoil,LT4 km,1.5 drop,and cutout.What else should i get done to my car to win this race?what times you guys think we run?
a mild cam and a set of 1.6 RR's and you'll smoke his ***..
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #5  
97firechicken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 271
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Originally Posted by afr lt1
Throw some headers on there and kick his butt.
pretty much that should do it man.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #6  
Z97LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 415
From: Raleigh, NC
I disagree. It definitely takes more than just headers. A few years back I had almost all bolt ons including headers and exhaust and mine barely kept up with stock LS1s. I was trapping about 106-107 mph at the time. The only way I could really see the average bolt on LT1 consistently outrunning LS1 cars is if the LS1 cars are poorly driven.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
97firechicken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 271
From: Dallas, TX, USA
my friend had a 2002 SS, and with bolt ons, ram air, and my long tube headers i pulled away from him at the line and by around 90 he very slowly started to creep but he had mods too. dunno maybe its the driver
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #8  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
$1,000,000,000 and the power of God behind you
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
The simple answer is: given a platform, i.e, the F-Body camaro with the same transmission, rearend, weight and driver's abilities, the car with the more horsepower and torque (cammed for drag racing----assuming equal traction) should prevail.

Having said that, since the Lt1/SS came out of the box with between 310-315 at the crank, or around 265 to the rear, and the Ls1, vintage 98 came out of the box with about 340-350 at the crank, or around 290-300 to the rear, one can pretty much conclude that the Ls1 will prevail.

When you prepare the Lt1 to provide and equal or more HP/TQ than the LS1 in question, then you should---from a technical stand point-----prevail.

We're not talking rocket surgery here.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #10  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
Originally Posted by BUBBA
The simple answer is: given a platform, i.e, the F-Body camaro with the same transmission, rearend, weight and driver's abilities, the car with the more horsepower and torque (cammed for drag racing----assuming equal traction) should prevail.

Having said that, since the Lt1/SS came out of the box with between 310-315 at the crank, or around 265 to the rear, and the Ls1, vintage 98 came out of the box with about 340-350 at the crank, or around 290-300 to the rear, one can pretty much conclude that the Ls1 will prevail.

When you prepare the Lt1 to provide and equal or more HP/TQ than the LS1 in question, then you should---from a technical stand point-----prevail.

We're not talking rocket surgery here.

It's obvious that you have to match or exceed the power of the LS-1 to be able to beat it in a race. The real question at hand is what modifications are necessary to achieve that power level.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
A lot of it has to do with the driver as well. I beat up on lots of LS1s from a dig simply because I was on drag radials and they weren't.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #12  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Again, it depends on how much more HP/TQ you need. I.e, how much HP/TQ does the LS1 have? If we are talking Stock v. Stock, you will obviously need to gain at least 50 hp. So, assuming the LS1 remains the same, then the Lt1 will need to add at least 50 HP.

So: Starting with 300 (for the sake of arguement) we begin by adding a CAI, 1.6 RRs, LT headers and mail-order tune.

CAI=8 RWHP+-
1.6 RRS= 12 RWHP+-
LT Headers=15 RWHP+-
Tuning=10 RWHP+-

Total RWHP gain= 45+- (bearing in mind that it is the combination that makes the differences in gains).

So using 15% loss +- you should have around 353 hp to the crank---which gives you about the same power as the out-of-the box LS1.

Of course there are different things and combinations that will provide the needed numbers, but the above are basically the bolt-on that will do the trick.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
Critter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,511
From: fort worth/burleson Tx
for an a4 stall converter and sticky tires... end of thread

but seeing that you have a m6 u will need sticky tires and the things mentioned by bubba. given that your driving skills are equal.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #14  
Sinister95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 683
From: Bullhead City, AZ
Or you could just throw a 100 shot on there and be done with it. That is probably the cheapest route to go also...
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #15  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
o right guys i feel a bit more confident now,i was at the track last weekend and i kept running 13.9-14.1 at 98-100mph,this was before airfoil and LT4 km,i still have $700 to throw in my car, should i get headers or some slicks?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.