LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Went WOT, now runs rough. DTC 13

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #1  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
Went WOT, now runs rough. DTC 13

I've had an SES light for about a month since the new trans and clutch, and Sat night I finally got WOT a few times on the xway then it started running as if on 7 cylinders. Now runs that way in open loop on startup too. Finally got a laptop yesterday and scanned w/DataMaster and got DTC 13. So does this mean my driver's side O2 was bad?
Also, would that have caused it to run very rough like it is now?
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #2  
SC/TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 358
If the light came on after the trany swap, it could just be a loose connection where the o2 sensor plugs into the harness. If it has came unhooked that would explain the rough running. Also make sure the o2 wires haven't touched the exhaust anywhere. It could have burned the wire causing a short.
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 07:50 AM
  #3  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
I'll check the connections. My other question is if it just a bad O2, why is it running real bad on startup and open loop as well? Fouled plugs or something else?
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #4  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
The SES light was a loose O2 connection. Replaced the plugs on that side also. Still runs terrible. Also has a loud tick. What could it be?
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #5  
BlazinREDZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
From: Louisiana
I just got through fixing my car. It would idle rough no matter what. I had several problems but the final problem was my left o2 sensor. The car ran like crap from start up on. The reason yours has probably started to run rough is probably because the pcm has made changes, based on the information gathered from the faulty o2 sensor or bad wiring which every it may be, and the fuel trims are probably off. What was the long term fuel trim on bank1 when you used data master?
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #6  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
short and long term fuel trims are all 128.
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,110
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by kgkern01
short and long term fuel trims are all 128.
In what cells, and open or closed loop?
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 07:51 AM
  #8  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
I believe was closed loop because it had been running about 15 min before I scanned it , can't remember for sure though. All 4 fuel trim cells (L & R, short & long term) showing 128.
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,110
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Then there's a good chance it wasn't in closed loop. If it was in closed loop, the short terms should be changing about 9 times per second, swinging above and below 128. If you have a dead sensor, it won't go into closed loop, and the short terms will remain fixed at 128. If at any time you were working on the vehicle you pulled the battery power, it reset the long terms to 128.

The circuit is open, either a dead sensor, a burned wire or a loose connector. What is the voltage for the driver's side O2 sensor?

A bit of extra info... there are 18 cells, each covering vairous combinations of RPM and engine load (MAP), plus idle, open loop fueling and decel. The "cells" contain only the long term (learned) fuel corrections. And each cell contains both left and righ long terms. Short terms are called that because they are used once and not saved. Your long term data is for a single cell, not 4.

Online scanning guide:

http://members.aol.com/InjuneerZZ/ScanMast.htm

Last edited by Injuneer; Mar 22, 2008 at 08:04 AM.
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #10  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
So do I need to disconnect the battery to reset the PCM after the O2 problem is fixed to correct the rough running problem, or is it something else?
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #11  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,110
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Resetting the PCM won't help. That will just return everything to "128", and if it runs poorly now at 128, its going to continue to run poorly in the future at 128. The idea is to get the O2 sensor problem fixed, then let the PCM go into closed loop and start "learning" the long term fuel corrections to put into each of the cells. That may fix the problem, or it may not.

Apparently you have had the O2 sensor problem for a while and the engine was still running OK. So the O2 sensor may not be the cause of the single cylinder misfire. The fact that it happened only after a WOT excursion may indicate a problem with a plug, wire, injector, bent pushrod, faulty lifter, loose rocker, damaged Opti rotor, etc.

Fix the O2 problem, and if it doesn't fix the problem (I'm guessing it won't), start looking for the cause of the misfire.
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #12  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
I also just noticed oil leaking from my timing cover. I bet the freakin opti seal is leaking! The opti has only been on a few months! I guess I'll check for spark at all of the plug ends first. Is there any way to detect for a bad lifter because of the ticking I hear?

Last edited by kgkern01; Mar 22, 2008 at 11:51 AM.
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #13  
kgkern01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,332
From: Louisville KY
Started this morning about 33* and while still missing, didn't start ticking until it got warm, getting louder the warmer it got. would that mean it may be exhaust related due to the missing?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jayblev95
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Jan 20, 2015 01:30 PM
Scottylt1
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Jan 8, 2015 02:48 PM
cmdeshon
Parts Wanted
1
Dec 16, 2014 07:58 AM
cmdeshon
New Member Introduction
3
Dec 12, 2014 10:51 PM
Scottylt1
Fuel and Ignition
1
Dec 4, 2014 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.