LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Timing chain question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #16  
RobBeck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 84
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: Timing chain question

Where did you get that info. I spoke with Cloyes and even they said go with the double roller if you want the best....

Rob

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Get a Cloyes LT-4 ED.It is a single roller and they say it is AS strong or stronger than a double roller,based on pin size.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #17  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Timing chain question

Originally Posted by RobBeck
Where did you get that info. I spoke with Cloyes and even they said go with the double roller if you want the best....

Rob
From an engineer at Cloyes,not a SALESMAN.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #18  
RobBeck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 84
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: Timing chain question

I am pretty sure the guy I spoke to was an Engineer, at minimum. We actually talked about the whole line and history of all the dealings with GM and aftermarket workings/etc. He knew his stuff for sure and surely did not act as if the LT4 setup was as reliable as the true roller. If you want to keep it simple (but expensive still), then yes go with that but if you want the best (same essential price) then dont. This was just last week, but I got no name (tech dept.)

Rob

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
From an engineer at Cloyes,not a SALESMAN.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #19  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Timing chain question

Originally Posted by RobBeck
I am pretty sure the guy I spoke to was an Engineer, at minimum. We actually talked about the whole line and history of all the dealings with GM and aftermarket workings/etc. He knew his stuff for sure and surely did not act as if the LT4 setup was as reliable as the true roller. If you want to keep it simple (but expensive still), then yes go with that but if you want the best (same essential price) then dont. This was just last week, but I got no name (tech dept.)

Rob

Well,look at it with common sense.A chain don't break the side straps,the pin breaks.
If ya had a chain with a 1/32" pin and one with a 1/16" pin which would be stronger?
The ED is a roller also and has been used with a lot more HP than you are making-ie more valve spring pressure and living,I use one on the shop car with 260# seat and 768# on the nose and no problems.Ya don't have to change a bunch of other stuff to run it,either.Ya will have to check the alignment of the sprockets,looking from the side and a streight edge.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #20  
RobBeck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 84
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: Timing chain question

I am just going on what he told me. I posted his essential bottom line above. He did believe in that being a quality unit but the cost of it really disgusted him, myself, and probably anyone else looking at it. IIRC, you still have to convert to the new style opti to use it also.... so that is alot of the cost right there. The biggest change was going with the electric water pump, which I am not crazy about but at least its cheaper. Perhaps it is stretch limits that is also a concern, and yes your car is def. pushing alot more spring than I will be with the setup but it would take a whole lot of convincing to say that the true double roller still wouldnt be a better setup than the LT4 (from a chain reliability/stretch/break/etc standpoint).

Rob

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Well,look at it with common sense.A chain don't break the side straps,the pin breaks.
If ya had a chain with a 1/32" pin and one with a 1/16" pin which would be stronger?
The ED is a roller also and has been used with a lot more HP than you are making-ie more valve spring pressure and living,I use one on the shop car with 260# seat and 768# on the nose and no problems.Ya don't have to change a bunch of other stuff to run it,either.Ya will have to check the alignment of the sprockets,looking from the side and a streight edge.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #21  
Spinner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,945
From: Fort Benning, GA
Re: Timing chain question

Dont know the part #. Fit fine on my car. Your going to have to grind the timing cover for any double roller.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 10:23 PM
  #22  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: Timing chain question

do you think a new stock chain would work
Yes you can run a stock replacment it been done plenty of times and i haven't heard any horror storys yet. plus i run one and its fine so far.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
phoenix95
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Jan 8, 2015 02:44 PM
phoenix95
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Jan 8, 2015 09:14 AM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
Nov 27, 2014 10:07 AM
GigaMp3z
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
Feb 20, 2003 02:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.