LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Spring height micrometer.. doing something wrong? Or more CompCams QC garbage?

Old Jan 23, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #16  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Call and bitch em out.


Glad I will never use a set of behives.....sound like POS IMO, I know the theory behind it but I have no faith in them
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #17  
truedualws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
lol this beehive micrometer is a joke...

I bored it out to fit the retainer.. it sits on the machined step.. not the upper lip. One would assume comp corrected the readings for the SMALLER retainer of the beehives.

Nope.

Getting 1.94 readings from the micrometer

The inner lip is about .14x (can't seem to get an exact/consistent reading w/ my calipers, gonna try the washer method tomorrow).

So that figures to about the 1.80 install height I believe Lloyd puts them at.

So I paid extra for a beehive micrometer that doesn't work any better than a standard micrometer. Nicely done comp cams.
I have a Crane mic and the beehive retainer sits on the first lip too. Mine
is exactly .150" down on the lip so I just add it back to the reading. This
way of measuring height is the best if you do it correctly. You need to seat
the keepers and retainer each time. Per Ai instructions I just snug the mic
in with the retainer and keepers in place then give the tip of the valve a good
rap with the resin end of a big screwdriver. One or two times doing this will
seat the keepers and give you the best reading. I found this rapping method
gave me more consistent readings that were .02 to .06 taller than without.

I ended up with installed heights from 1.815" to 1.824", not as close as I had
hoped for, but close enough for my baby cam set up.
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #18  
truedualws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Originally Posted by mdacton
Call and bitch em out.


Glad I will never use a set of behives.....sound like POS IMO, I know the theory behind it but I have no faith in them
I ran the beehives for about 5k miles, most of them pretty hard as my car
is more for playing on the weekend and when I take it out I usually flog it
pretty good. They worked fine, but I'm with you in that I just don't trust a
single spring. I've since switched to dual springs and even though my spring,
retainer setup is much heavier that the beehive setup, I feel better knowing
there are dual springs in there. We will see at the dyno if the valve train is
doing a good job or not as this is the only mechanical change made. Everything
else is VE stuff.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #19  
cehan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 387
From: Brandon, Fla.
I wonder how Lloyd checks them?
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #20  
96flame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 599
From: Waterloo, Ontario
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
lol this beehive micrometer is a joke...

I bored it out to fit the retainer.. it sits on the machined step.. not the upper lip. One would assume comp corrected the readings for the SMALLER retainer of the beehives.

Nope.

Getting 1.94 readings from the micrometer

The inner lip is about .14x (can't seem to get an exact/consistent reading w/ my calipers, gonna try the washer method tomorrow).
Its my understanding that all spring mics of this design work that way. You have to do a bit of math.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #21  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
Originally Posted by 96flame
Its my understanding that all spring mics of this design work that way. You have to do a bit of math.
Then what's the advantage of selling these "beehive" micrometers? They're more expensive and of no benefit to beehive owners.

I could have just borrowed a regular one.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #22  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
I spoke to comp's tech line.

They said to just subtract .140 from the reading. He apologized and literally told me "sorry, it's kinda a gay thing that you have to do that..."

I mentioned to him that 795 retainers don't fit, and he sounded suprised. Unfortunately I was in a hurry b/c I had a work call coming in I had to take and couldn't discuss further.

So basically the 4930 tool is useless, don't buy it.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #23  
LT4POWR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 586
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
"sorry, it's kinda a gay thing that you have to do that..."
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 07:17 AM
  #24  
The Engineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,388
From: Moore Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
I spoke to comp's tech line.

They said to just subtract .140 from the reading. He apologized and literally told me "sorry, it's kinda a gay thing that you have to do that..."

I mentioned to him that 795 retainers don't fit, and he sounded suprised. Unfortunately I was in a hurry b/c I had a work call coming in I had to take and couldn't discuss further.

So basically the 4930 tool is useless, don't buy it.
I always use my dial-calipers to re-measure what the valve spring micrometer indicates. I know my dial-calipers are correct.

My PAC-1518s are installed at about 1.780".

WD

Old Jan 26, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #25  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
I'm almost done.. I'm installing my 1518's at 1.75"
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #26  
cehan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 387
From: Brandon, Fla.
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
I'm almost done.. I'm installing my 1518's at 1.75"
So how did you end making the valve spring micrometer work, by subtracting the 0.140" as Comp suggested?
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #27  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
Originally Posted by cehan
So how did you end making the valve spring micrometer work, by subtracting the 0.140" as Comp suggested?
Yep, subtracted the .140 and bored out the tool so the retainers would even fit

I doublechecked readings w/ a digital caliper for the first couple springs to make sure.
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #28  
The Engineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,388
From: Moore Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
I'm almost done.. I'm installing my 1518's at 1.75"
Do you have an idea what your closed seat pressure is now with the 1.750" installed height? I know 1.800" is 130# closed seat pressure. It seems like a lot of people now-days don't prefer the beehives for HRs in the range you and I have.

WD

Last edited by The Engineer; Jan 27, 2008 at 06:32 AM.
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 08:42 AM
  #29  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
Originally Posted by The Engineer
Do you have an idea what your closed seat pressure is now with the 1.750" installed height? I know 1.800" is 130# closed seat pressure. It seems like a lot of people now-days don't prefer the beehives for HRs in the range you and I have.

WD
I'm not sure... I can probably check with PAC to see if they have any documentation on the numbers.
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 09:19 AM
  #30  
truedualws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Originally Posted by The Engineer
Do you have an idea what your closed seat pressure is now with the 1.750" installed height? I know 1.800" is 130# closed seat pressure. It seems like a lot of people now-days don't prefer the beehives for HRs in the range you and I have.

WD
It's 146# @ 1.75"
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
timmy39120
New Member Introduction
4
May 2, 2015 05:12 PM
Cam's maro
LT1 Based Engine Tech
23
Mar 24, 2015 08:09 PM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
cmdeshon
New Member Introduction
3
Dec 12, 2014 10:51 PM
MBonZ28
Drag Racing Technique
7
Jul 30, 2002 11:42 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.