LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Quick cam question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2008, 01:02 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TBSPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 388
Quick cam question

im goin to get a cam soon and i want something aggressive as hell...my car is basically a weekend cruiser with the occasional drag visit and a few street races...gas i really couldnt care less about and im basically not caring about emissions anymore either...i know the the cc306 is great and the gm847 but what would be the best bang for my buck...also i really wouldnt want to do my heads but i could go for the LE2 i think.
TBSPW is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 01:25 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Originally Posted by TBSPW
im goin to get a cam soon and i want something aggressive as hell...my car is basically a weekend cruiser with the occasional drag visit and a few street races...gas i really couldnt care less about and im basically not caring about emissions anymore either...i know the the cc306 is great and the gm847 but what would be the best bang for my buck...also i really wouldnt want to do my heads but i could go for the LE2 i think.
If you just want it for "sound". And do not care about drivability, gas, or anything for that matter go as big as you like. But remember, if you buy a huge cam that requires 7000 rpms, then you just wasted cash. The stock bottom end can only take so many rpm's. Keep this in mind. Your max I would go is a gm847, and I would not put that in my car if it was stock. Others have done it though.
bombebomb is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 11:28 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
MadMike 97 Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 139
Originally Posted by bombebomb
If you just want it for "sound". And do not care about drivability, gas, or anything for that matter go as big as you like. But remember, if you buy a huge cam that requires 7000 rpms, then you just wasted cash. The stock bottom end can only take so many rpm's. Keep this in mind. Your max I would go is a gm847, and I would not put that in my car if it was stock. Others have done it though.
ANY CAM will work on stock bottom end! BUT it will only meet its full potential with the correct supporting mods!

I have a stock bottom end with a GM847 and it is very streetable drives just fine. But I decided on that cam because I was envisioning where I wanted the Camaro to end up performance wise. EX: I would rather buy a gm847 now than have a hotcam because if I had the hot cam I would have to buy another cam further down the road as my engines performance progressed, and THAT WOULD BE WASTED CASH. So you need to decide your end goal and slowly work towards it. Keep in mind you can't just skip steps. If you are going to go with a big cam now (stock bottom end or not) you have to build the rest of the valvetrain to support it. EX: you cant run stock valve springs and pushrods on an 847.

So in the end it all comes down to what you have planned for your car and then you continue to build it to that point.
MadMike 97 Z28 is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 12:12 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Originally Posted by MadMike 97 Z28
ANY CAM will work on stock bottom end! BUT it will only meet its full potential with the correct supporting mods!

I have a stock bottom end with a GM847 and it is very streetable drives just fine. But I decided on that cam because I was envisioning where I wanted the Camaro to end up performance wise. EX: I would rather buy a gm847 now than have a hotcam because if I had the hot cam I would have to buy another cam further down the road as my engines performance progressed, and THAT WOULD BE WASTED CASH. So you need to decide your end goal and slowly work towards it. Keep in mind you can't just skip steps. If you are going to go with a big cam now (stock bottom end or not) you have to build the rest of the valvetrain to support it. EX: you cant run stock valve springs and pushrods on an 847.

So in the end it all comes down to what you have planned for your car and then you continue to build it to that point.
Well, from what he has told us, he mentioned nothing about doing anything else to the engine. If he plans to rebuild sometime, then a cam such as that would be more reasonable.
bombebomb is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 05:13 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TBSPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 388
im deffinetly leaning towards the LE2 package but not much more...the bottom end is stock but still pulling massively strong...i basically have a full bult on car and a bunch of suspension work i just dont put in my sig...i thought a LE2 would give me plenty of power...any buddy have a idea on what i would make with that set up?
TBSPW is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 05:57 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
MadMike 97 Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 139
Originally Posted by TBSPW
im deffinetly leaning towards the LE2 package but not much more...the bottom end is stock but still pulling massively strong...i basically have a full bult on car and a bunch of suspension work i just dont put in my sig...i thought a LE2 would give me plenty of power...any buddy have a idea on what i would make with that set up?
the stock bottom end wouldn't be able to spin high enough to meet the full potential of that setup but it will still be probably in the high 300's
MadMike 97 Z28 is offline  
Old 12-19-2008, 12:37 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TBSPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 388
well i know i would never rev it that high...hell i usually dont crack 6300 on my tach so im not too worried about all the higher up horsepower...mainly i want to be in the upper 300 horsepower with a stock bottom end.
TBSPW is offline  
Old 12-19-2008, 09:54 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
87bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 660
AI or LE packages are the way to go if you go h/c

if you go cam only I'd recommend the cc503
87bandit is offline  
Old 12-19-2008, 10:57 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TBSPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 388
yeah i was looking around at the cc503 and like it quite a bit...but wouldnt it be worth it just to call up lloyd and get at least a LE1 and have him make a cam for me...with a stock bottom end is it worth doing a LE2 or should i just even go cam only at this point?
TBSPW is offline  
Old 12-19-2008, 04:31 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
87bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 660
it's all what your budget and goals are

if you can afford to and want to go h/c then by all means, if your budget only allows for cam-only and you believe you'll be satisfied with it then go ahead

how many miles are on your stock bottom end? don't be disillusioned by common belief that motors explode at xxx,xxx miles. I have 146k miles on my cammed LT1 that has seen tons of abuse with and without a bottle, and my friend just ran 10's last sunday on his 180,000 mile LT1
87bandit is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 02:04 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TBSPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 388
money really isnt a problem here...i would rather do things in one shot and spend alot now than little by little spending even more...im thinking the LE2 is gunna be my best bet...my car has like 93,000 miles and i might go nitrous in the future...never a big shot just something to help me out when i need it.
TBSPW is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 10:19 AM
  #12  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,650
Originally Posted by TBSPW
well i know i would never rev it that high...hell i usually dont crack 6300 on my tach so im not too worried about all the higher up horsepower...mainly i want to be in the upper 300 horsepower with a stock bottom end.
You have conflicting reuirements.... a cam that is "aggressive as hell" is going to have a weak bottom end, and require 6,500-7,000rpm to make power on top. Definitely not a "street racer". If you aren't going to run higher RPM (and the required upgrades to support it) you aren't going about this the right way.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 10:44 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TBSPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 388
like i said i want the best set up for what i have now...thats why i want the LE2...i might do bottom end work but only when something blows.
TBSPW is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
12-20-2014 09:51 PM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
12-20-2014 09:11 PM
Noenav
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
14
12-06-2014 07:35 PM



Quick Reply: Quick cam question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.