LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Quest: 30mpg+ LT1 DD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #61  
Malice 1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 444
From: Cherry point NC
Originally Posted by SnakeOiler
Are you monitoring this with software?

Are you planning on doing an 80mph mod?
No, I'm not monitoring it with software. I don't accelerate at exactly 20% throttle every time. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to know how to drive conservativley though.

I'm not doing any testing above 75mph right now. Drag increases with the square of speed.

Later on I'm doing some aerodynamic testing though. GTS light covers, filling in cracks, etc... That ought to make driving at 80mph a little easier on gas.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #62  
Malice 1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 444
From: Cherry point NC
Originally Posted by Z28Roxy
How about some 5W20 oil and NEVER gun it?
I'm already driving like an old woman for these tests. Trust me, I never gun it ever.

I don't really trust putting thinner oil in a high mileage 15 year old engine. My oil pressure is already pretty low. If anything, I'll switch to 10w40.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #63  
SnakeOiler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 391
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by Malice 1
....I'm not doing any testing above 75mph right now. Drag increases with the square of speed.

Later on I'm doing some aerodynamic testing though. GTS light covers, filling in cracks, etc... That ought to make driving at 80mph a little easier on gas.
I used to get 33mpg @ 80mph when I was stock - very curious for your results on this. Thanks.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 11:50 AM
  #64  
Malice 1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 444
From: Cherry point NC
Originally Posted by SnakeOiler
I used to get 33mpg @ 80mph when I was stock - very curious for your results on this. Thanks.
Were you only driving downhill? I got 33mpg on a trip once, but later I found out it was because there was a 1000' elevation decrease between start and finish. I only got 27mpg on the way home.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #65  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
Originally Posted by Malice 1
Drag increases with the square of speed.
That is true but you should be more concerned with power it takes to overcome drag in this case since it relates directly to fuel usage. Power is related to aero drag by the velocity cubed. Because of that drag increases quite dramaticly with even small speed increases. Its really hard to test drag in the real world, wind around here cause up to +-10g/ in maf readings on a flat stretch of road here with the cruise on.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #66  
Malice 1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 444
From: Cherry point NC
Originally Posted by WS6T3RROR
That is true but you should be more concerned with power it takes to overcome drag in this case since it relates directly to fuel usage. Power is related to aero drag by the velocity cubed. Because of that drag increases quite dramaticly with even small speed increases. Its really hard to test drag in the real world, wind around here cause up to +-10g/ in maf readings on a flat stretch of road here with the cruise on.
I'm a strike fighter pilot. I know a thing or two about drag.

My jet has all sorts of bumps, cracks, antenna's and other drag producing items. Most of it is blended to the fuselage with an RTV type substance. When I start my aero testing, I'm gonna try and mimic that to a small extent. If I get better mpg, then the mods worked. If not, then they didn't.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 12:47 AM
  #67  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Here are some secrets to get good gas mileage:
Don't rev past your torque peak. Your torque peak is where the engine is operating at its highest efficiency.
Only accelerate as much as the car will move forward. Do not give the engine more gas than it needs to move (reasonable pace) or you will be overloading the engine causing it to consume more gas.
Around town, do not overload the engine (what is meant by that is pushing the gas pedal down yet feeling no acceleration take place).
If you have an auto trans and are in town or stop and go, use the appropriate gear. Don't just leave it in "D" or whatever your tranny says which includes OD engagment.
At highway speeds stay away from overdrive gears on hilly terrain if too much load is being put on the engine (push accelerator/no response) unless the engine is running at its torque peak and can maintain given RPM. If you cannot maintain given RPM then downshift and maintain speed at torque peak RPM. There is a wives tale about how higher RPM is what consumes fuel. That cannot be farther from the truth. Improper/irresponsible load on the engine is what consumes fuel.
In order to reap the benefits from the above you need to be extremely vigilant with with the terrain in which you travel.
live in a flat state
do not use A/C
do not roll down the windows
do not overload the car
always check tire pressure

Last edited by SS RRR; Apr 17, 2008 at 08:29 AM.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #68  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Z28Roxy
Draft semis
Yeah, they really appreciate it.

The last thing you want is a guy with a 60,000lb vehicle to be pissed at you.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #69  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by Z28Roxy
Draft semis
Hell, just latch onto a semi = infinite mpg
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #70  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
I knew a kid who had a 2.73 rear end in his M6 car. Said his mileage was pretty damn good. You should try that, then swap rears when it's time to race or have fun.

-Dustin-
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #71  
maybe2fast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 889
From: Commerce, MI
2.73 and a M6! that must have sucked to drive...
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #72  
Malice 1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 444
From: Cherry point NC
Originally Posted by Bersaglieri
I knew a kid who had a 2.73 rear end in his M6 car. Said his mileage was pretty damn good. You should try that, then swap rears when it's time to race or have fun.

-Dustin-

Yeah....

I'll just swap rear ends in the parking lot of my apartment every friday night when I feel like getting sporty. I don't think the landlord would appreciate that.


My next mod is gonna be the weight redux mod. I'm gonna remove all unessesary junk in the trunk. I'm not stripping the interior, but I don't need to be carrying around a full tool kit and all of my school books.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #73  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Yeah, they really appreciate it.

The last thing you want is a guy with a 60,000lb vehicle to be pissed at you.
Yeah truck drivers really don't like not being able to see you.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #74  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Originally Posted by Malice 1
I'm a strike fighter pilot.
Sorry, I figured strike fighter pilots made enough to have a garage

My other suggestion would have been a 9" with two different center chunks. I have a 4.11 and a 4.56.

-Dustin-
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #75  
Malice 1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 444
From: Cherry point NC
Originally Posted by Bersaglieri
Sorry, I figured strike fighter pilots made enough to have a garage

My other suggestion would have been a 9" with two different center chunks. I have a 4.11 and a 4.56.

-Dustin-
I admit ownage!!!!

I live in an apt. I'll buy a house when I get stationed somewhere permanently.

I'm happy with my 3.23s though. I probably wont' ever go into the rear end unless I have too. They provide me a good blend of MPG and performance.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.