LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

problem with my new 396 lt1 #help#

Old Jul 8, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #1  
amean94ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
Exclamation problem with my new 396 lt1 #help#

ok i think its just fuel pressure problems because i run 116 octane and i cant smell it burning! But it does burn the eyes if your in the back of the car. On my drive back from the exhaust shop it died at every stoplight. I have a accel gauge hooked up and its pegged to 65 psi I know thats not good so i am just gonna put my old regulator back on this aeremotive thing sucks i bought it last year during my parts gathering months i am running 36lbs injectors do you think the stock regulator will be fine? it is tuned by pcmforless.com. p.s what is the stock regulator set at
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #2  
97Z-M6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,058
From: near waco tx.
i think stock is 43.5 and if your running 60 psi i bet it does stall out at a stop because thers so much fuel. you could run that pressure but you would have to retune the injector costants
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 10:20 PM
  #3  
amean94ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
so then stock should be fine? i tell you what though it still moves pretty good but i need to fix it thank you
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Every post I have ever read about the Aeromotive AFPR has been about how it won't adjust the pressure..... it just stays at 65+psi. Appears the Aeromotive is a total POS, based on the large numbers of problems.

If you told your tuner that you were running 36# injectors at 43.5psi, you are pouring 22+% extra fuel into the cylinders. The PCM can not correct for that much excess. You may be washing the lubrication off the cylinder walls, risking serious damage. I'd get it fixed before you hurt anything.

Why would you run $7/gallon racing fuel anywhere other than the track?
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #5  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally posted by Injuneer
Every post I have ever read about the Aeromotive AFPR has been about how it won't adjust the pressure..... it just stays at 65+psi. Appears the Aeromotive is a total POS, based on the large numbers of problems.
Must be a recent problem...mine has no problem adjusting pressure.
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #6  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
MIne has no problem either, Turn it down dude! Have you tried adjusting it?
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #7  
kirschman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 381
From: kentucky
wouldnt it just run past the injectors into the return line if it had to much PSI? I could be wrong. The injectors can only handle so much fuel.
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #8  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
Originally posted by kirschman
wouldnt it just run past the injectors into the return line if it had to much PSI? I could be wrong. The injectors can only handle so much fuel.
The computer has the inj. constant setup with 43.5psi in mind, so when it calculates how long to keep the injector open, it is based upon the flowrate of the injector at the given pressure. So if the injector opens for 1 second (exaggerated) and it thinks it flows 36lb/hr @ 43.5psi. However, with the higher fuel pressure the injectors are acting like 54lb/hr's. This will show its affects at WOT, but typically the computer will adjust based upon O2 sensor readings during closed loop.

Someone correct me if I am wrong.
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 12:50 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Your concept is right, its the math that you screwed up. The injector is simply an "orifice" that controls the flow rate of fuel. The flow through the injector can be calculated using the orifice equation. Essentially, flow through the injector is proportional to the square root of the pressure ratio.

Appears you figured:

65 / 43.5 = 1.494

1.494 X 36 = 53.8#/Hr.

The correct calculation is:

65 / 43.5 = 1.494

1.494 ^ 0.5 = 1.222

1.222 X 36 = 44.0#/Hr.

As I stated in my post, the 65psi fuel pressure is causing the injectors to deliver 22+% extra fuel with each pulse. The long term fuel corrections can only pull about 15% before they "bottom out".... 108 / 128 = 0.844. So there is no way the PCM can prevent the system from running rich in closed loop (except for setting super low INT's), .... and when you go into PE mode at WOT, since it was "reducing" fuel in closed loop, the BLM's will default to 128, and you will be pouring in 22.2% extra fuel. A properly set A/F ratio of 13.0:1 (for example) will be producing a 10.6:1 A/F ratio because of the extra fuel through the injectors.

A
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #10  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
If it's really running as rich as it appears you better fix it, pronto. Once you start getting into the 10:1 range you not only are going to foul your plugs but you may wash the cylinder walls clean of lubricant (oil) and cause major wear problems down the road.

It may be even worse than Fred's calculations suggest if the tune is for stock injectors, though you do indicate that it's a custom tune.

Rich Krause
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #11  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
Originally posted by Injuneer
Your concept is right, its the math that you screwed up. The injector is simply an "orifice" that controls the flow rate of fuel. The flow through the injector can be calculated using the orifice equation. Essentially, flow through the injector is proportional to the square root of the pressure ratio.

Appears you figured:

65 / 43.5 = 1.494

1.494 X 36 = 53.8#/Hr.

The correct calculation is:

65 / 43.5 = 1.494

1.494 ^ 0.5 = 1.222

1.222 X 36 = 44.0#/Hr.

As I stated in my post, the 65psi fuel pressure is causing the injectors to deliver 22+% extra fuel with each pulse. The long term fuel corrections can only pull about 15% before they "bottom out".... 108 / 128 = 0.844. So there is no way the PCM can prevent the system from running rich in closed loop (except for setting super low INT's), .... and when you go into PE mode at WOT, since it was "reducing" fuel in closed loop, the BLM's will default to 128, and you will be pouring in 22.2% extra fuel. A properly set A/F ratio of 13.0:1 (for example) will be producing a 10.6:1 A/F ratio because of the extra fuel through the injectors.

A
Good work Fred! Thanks for the insight!
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 09:34 AM
  #12  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally posted by RealQuick
Good work Fred! Thanks for the insight!
When I grow up, I wanna be a teacher.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfernalVortex
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
Jan 17, 2015 09:35 AM
89 iroc zl1
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
0
Jan 14, 2015 02:18 AM
FilledWithFurySS
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
5
Jul 26, 2002 02:00 PM
JasonD
Site Help and Suggestions
9
Jul 15, 2002 02:17 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.