LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

PCV question-injuneer??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #1  
ead94z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
From: Maryland
Question PCV question-injuneer??or anyone??

I know there is a thread on this right now but I have a question and I did not want ot steal anyones thread. There is long black hose that comes off of the passenger TB and goes to the valve cover and is attached with an elbow fitting. I understand that this is part of the PCV system. I took mine off at the valve cover and there is no air suction or pressure of any kind. Should there be? I have suction at the PCV valve itself.

Last edited by ead94z28; Oct 15, 2003 at 09:48 PM.
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 09:42 PM
  #2  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
(if you page more than one person you will get more responses)
you should have a small amount of suction at the throttle body side of the hose at idle.
jesse
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 09:44 PM
  #3  
ead94z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
From: Maryland
I paged injuneer because he just responded to a thread like this. But thank you for your reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #4  
ead94z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
From: Maryland
I actually have nothing at that hose. No suction or anything.
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #5  
1msfyter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,194
From: Austin texas
The suction should be coming from the throttle body, not the valve cover.
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 10:06 PM
  #6  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
do you have an airfoil? they block the passage in the TB, you could take the TB and make sure its clean around all the passages
be sure to clean the top out

if you dont have emissions you can just put a breather filter on the valve cover hole, and plug the TB hole and it will work just fine injuneer has a good write up in a thread on this. click here http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...&highlight=pcv

jesse
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #7  
ead94z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
From: Maryland
Right. I have nothing there, at the metal pipe coming off the TB. WTF?
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 10:18 PM
  #8  
ead94z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
From: Maryland
Unfortuneately I do have emissions. I am worried that because I am not getting a suction on the TB side that something is blocked somewhere.
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 10:27 PM
  #9  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
just pull it off and look
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #10  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
There will not be any vacuum at the throttle body end. That line supplies clean, MAF measured air from a port in front of the throttle blades (not exposed to intake manifold vacuum, except at WOT).

The air flows from the connection on the side of the TB, down the black rubber hose, into the passenger side valve cover, and is pulled through the crankcase and lifter valley, through the PCV valve, and dumped into the intake manifold (drivers side of the manifold on 93/94, a port under the TB on the front of the manifold on 95-97). If you see any vacuum at all, at idle, it should be at the valve cover, not at the TB. But remember, there are springs in the PCV valve to limit flow under certain conditions, so you might not see much in the way of vacuum at all at idle.

Removing the system, and adding a crankcase breather, is equivalent to intentionally adding a vacuum leak to your intake (94-97), allowing air that has not been measured by the MAF to enter the combustion process. The long term fuel corrections can deal with this "leak" fairly easily.
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #11  
ead94z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
From: Maryland
Thanks. I'm not event thinking of removing anything.
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 12:13 PM
  #12  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I also wouldn't worry about the PCV system with regards to "emissions testing". In the "old days" (when I was probably your age ) they used to vent the crankcase by using a "draft tube"... simply a short length of pipe the exited straight down at the bottom of the engine. Air flowing under the car sucked the vapors out of the crankcase. The "closed" PCV system is an attempt to contain those vapors by recycling them to the intake manifold. Not having the system working correctly would simply allow those vapors to escape from the engine in some other way, not affecting the tailpipe emissions.
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 12:20 PM
  #13  
PGR's Avatar
PGR
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 209
Originally posted by Injuneer
There will not be any vacuum at the throttle body end. That line supplies clean, MAF measured air from a port in front of the throttle blades (not exposed to intake manifold vacuum, except at WOT).

The air flows from the connection on the side of the TB, down the black rubber hose, into the passenger side valve cover, and is pulled through the crankcase and lifter valley, through the PCV valve, and dumped into the intake manifold (drivers side of the manifold on 93/94, a port under the TB on the front of the manifold on 95-97). If you see any vacuum at all, at idle, it should be at the valve cover, not at the TB. But remember, there are springs in the PCV valve to limit flow under certain conditions, so you might not see much in the way of vacuum at all at idle.

Removing the system, and adding a crankcase breather, is equivalent to intentionally adding a vacuum leak to your intake (94-97), allowing air that has not been measured by the MAF to enter the combustion process. The long term fuel corrections can deal with this "leak" fairly easily.
The above statement is true during high-vaccum conditions (idle, cruising, light acceleration). During low vaccuum conditions (heavy acceleration, WOT) crankcase pressure is relieved via the passenger-side breather tube, into the throttle body. The vaccuum in the intake manifold isn't strong enough to purge the crancase in this situaton (PCV valve is too much a restriction).

So, the passenger-side breather tube is really a two-way street. Metered air drawn INTO the crankcase via the breather hose during high vaccum conditions, blowby exiting OUT of the crankcase via the breather hose and into the intake during low vaccum conditions.

People that remove the breather hose and put one of those K&N breather filters on top of the passenger valve covers are not improving anything. They run the risk of vapor build-up in the crankcase, which contaminates oil, and runs the risk of a crankcase explosion. Also, they are gross polluters. PCV was probably the first effective emmisions system appled to the auto, and there are really no negatives associated with it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drt
LS1 Based Engine Tech
6
Sep 27, 2015 04:39 PM
surreybrad
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Aug 10, 2015 09:34 AM
mineralwater
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
Oct 17, 2003 05:34 PM
asianice25
LS1 Based Engine Tech
13
Apr 2, 2003 11:42 AM
got_hp?
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Mar 15, 2003 11:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.