New dyno numbers
Holy crap! Great numbers.
Thanks for posting your numbers. I have a very similar setup, engine wise, and I thought there was more in it. Your numbers prove that. I'm happy with my numbers right now, but would be REALLY happy with your numbers.
Those are SAE numbers right?
My STD numbers were 289 rwhp / 322 rwtq
Dan
Thanks for posting your numbers. I have a very similar setup, engine wise, and I thought there was more in it. Your numbers prove that. I'm happy with my numbers right now, but would be REALLY happy with your numbers.
Those are SAE numbers right?
My STD numbers were 289 rwhp / 322 rwtq
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; May 25, 2004 at 07:51 PM.
Originally posted by Injuneer
Then "going back in better weather" isn't going to help.... that's what the correction factor takes care of.
Then "going back in better weather" isn't going to help.... that's what the correction factor takes care of.
Yeah, if it's only corrected for altitude somehow, then it's not corrected to SAE. How high of an altitude are you at? I'm not sure I can compare to your numbers anymore, because I'm at sea level, and no matter how you correct to higher altitudes, I'm not sure you would come up with the same numbers as you would at sea level.
What does the dyno chart say on it?
Good numbers though.
Dan
What does the dyno chart say on it?
Good numbers though.
Dan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
racecarz28
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Mar 30, 2015 09:55 PM
Joe Brodman
Drag Racing Technique
5
Jul 24, 2002 05:24 AM



