LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

my track times: WTF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #31  
snorkelface's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,320
From: Alta Loma, CA
Originally posted by Injuneer
To identify the "Baby LT1":
So is this the ungine used in the 4.3 S-10s and Blazers around 1998-2000 or so? If not those years, then which ones? Does the intake actually look like an :T1 intake, and all the accessories and stuff are the same, including the Optispark? If that's the case, then I need to guy pop the hood of a Blazer! Let me know.
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 11:55 AM
  #32  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
The "baby LT1" (265ci) was only used in the 94-96 Caprice/Roadmaster/Fleetwoods, just like the real (350ci) LT1. To my knowledge, it was never used in any trucks. The 4.3L S-10 Blazer was a V6.

Look at this article for info on the similarities and differences between the 265 and the 350. They should look very similar.
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 12:21 PM
  #33  
Z95m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,070
From: newton, kansas, USA
i am not sure on this but i think the 265 must of been standard in a caprice and a 350 a option. I bought the motor i built for my car out of a caprice and i checked the casting number on the block not the 327 but the actual part number and it was a 350. So i don't know how they decided which car got what type of engine unless it was a option.
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 01:31 PM
  #34  
snorkelface's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,320
From: Alta Loma, CA
Originally posted by Injuneer
The "baby LT1" (265ci) was only used in the 94-96 Caprice/Roadmaster/Fleetwoods, just like the real (350ci) LT1. To my knowledge, it was never used in any trucks. The 4.3L S-10 Blazer was a V6.

Look at this article for info on the similarities and differences between the 265 and the 350. They should look very similar.
oh, OK. I thought maybe it was a V6 because of the 4.3L of displacement. I was wondering why they said the heads would bolt up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Louey
Pacific
1
Oct 1, 2015 12:37 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 16, 2015 10:30 AM
94ZinEdgewater
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Sep 8, 2015 09:55 PM
Louey
Pacific
0
Sep 1, 2015 07:19 PM
Louey
Pacific
0
Aug 25, 2015 01:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.