LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

More XE cam dyno results.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2003 | 04:56 PM
  #46  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
I'm not sure exactly how STD differs from SAE, but the dyno numbers in my sig, corrected using STD standards gives me 351.21 rwhp and 362.91 tq. If there is a direct correlation between the two, I'd say you are right around 335 rwhp, SAE.

Good numbers either way.


Last edited by 97bowtie; Aug 28, 2003 at 04:59 PM.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 01:29 AM
  #47  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Ok there seems to be some doctoring on this Dyno, I calculated his correction factor to be 1.017 not 1.04, therefore; you only dynoed 343.24 RWHP, reason being is I calculated my dyno correction factor here locally & it was .097, my dyno sheet says .097 aswell, I calculated yours several times & its 1.017 not 1.04, your graph is doctored!
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #48  
94formulabz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,591
From: PA
Originally posted by bunker
Ok there seems to be some doctoring on this Dyno, I calculated his correction factor to be 1.017 not 1.04, therefore; you only dynoed 343.24 RWHP, reason being is I calculated my dyno correction factor here locally & it was .097, my dyno sheet says .097 aswell, I calculated yours several times & its 1.017 not 1.04, your graph is doctored!
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/cf.htm
Using the formula as found in there i calculated the same 1.017 correction factor. So taking 351/1.04*1.017 gives us 343.4 SAE HP and 343.6 SAE tq. Not too shabby.

WHEW, nice, still over 340. Another FYI, http://www.superflow.com/support/cycledyn-theory.html
according to that, SAE hp is SAE J1349 standard of June 1990. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg (99 kPa) of dry air and 77 F (25°C).

STD hp is also a SAE correction, just to a different temperature condition. SO therefore if it says STD or SAE STD or STP it is the slightly higher (lower normalization temperature) readings. If it just says SAE hp then it should be SAE J1349.

Soooo.............I say funk the dyno and I'll just go get some track times
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:11 AM
  #49  
94formulabz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,591
From: PA
Originally posted by SkarodoM
LOL... take a breather buddy.. the correction factor isnt a big deal really. I'm just picky about consistency & whatnot & most people don't know any better anyway.

STD is what alot of race guys use & has been around for a long time, it's just #'s corrected to 60deg F & 29.92" vs. SAE being 77degF and 29.23 or 29.6 (cant recall offhand).

Thats not being picky Phil, that is being accurate in the information and results you present for others. I truely thank you for pointing that out, it was an honest mistake on my part that i didn't realize there were 2 corrections available.

I called the shop and he said "i'll get them to you next week.............." ripoff mustang shop bastards. I think the 343 SAE-J calculated above is correct though.

-brent
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #50  
joeSS97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,781
From: Detroit area
Still darn good #'s.I know it was an honest mistake.Higher than the 224/230 I saw yesterday.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:40 AM
  #51  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
On an XE 230/236 in a 383 LT1 I pulled 378rwhp and 383lb ft of torque through a 700R4 with a 3200 stall.

The dyno guys said if I had a T56 it would have been 400rwhp.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:44 AM
  #52  
Don 97 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,041
From: Robinson, IL
Originally posted by Gripenfelter
On an XE 230/236 in a 383 LT1 I pulled 378rwhp and 383lb ft of torque through a 700R4 with a 3200 stall.

The dyno guys said if I had a T56 it would have been 400rwhp.
That's great. We are happy for you. But what is your point? I'm not sure.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 11:06 AM
  #53  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
No point. Just sharing results.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 11:52 AM
  #54  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Originally posted by Gripenfelter
No point. Just sharing results.

Where your numbers SAE ?
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 09:45 PM
  #55  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Mine are SAE: 224/230 STOCK bottom end, ported heads, ASM headers through a cat:

375/363 at the wheels.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:11 PM
  #56  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally posted by bunker
Where your numbers SAE ?
Yup.

If it helps, I dynoed on a 84.2 F day.
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #57  
RealDealZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 234
Where'd you buy the cam from?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Russ95Z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Apr 23, 2015 01:55 PM
ad356
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
Apr 11, 2015 10:30 PM
racecarz28
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Mar 30, 2015 09:55 PM
IgorT.455/406
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Mar 12, 2015 03:39 AM
armedtrigger
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Feb 24, 2015 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.