LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
Originally Posted by bunker
I dunno I think the hotcam is a great cam that will be faster then both of those cams, because of its slow ramps it'll act like a bigger cam down low as in not as much power right away, but it will rev and make power to about 6500rpm or so without falling off, I can't say the same thing for those XE cams mentioned, they will sound like smaller cams at idle, have more power down low but fall off immediately after about 5800-6100rpm tops which = less peal power and less track times as a result of lower rpm shifts and inertia at the track.
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
Originally Posted by bunker
I dunno I think the hotcam is a great cam that will be faster then both of those cams, because of its slow ramps it'll act like a bigger cam down low as in not as much power right away, but it will rev and make power to about 6500rpm or so without falling off, I can't say the same thing for those XE cams mentioned, they will sound like smaller cams at idle, have more power down low but fall off immediately after about 5800-6100rpm tops which = less peal power and less track times as a result of lower rpm shifts and inertia at the track.
I've run a best of 12.0x @ 112.81 on a 1.61 60' (on Nitto's and 2800 stall) with the 224/230 XE 112 LSA grind. This is with bone stock never been off the car heads and 1.6 rollers. All this on a pcmforless mail order tune.
For a comparison gain, in similar weather the best I could muster out of my car with bolt ons (only change being the cam and gears) was a 12.9 @ 104.9.
The cam change picked up on average 5-6 mph in my car.
The 224/230 is an excellent cam and my car has gone quicker on stock heads than most, if not all the hotcam cars I've seen.
Last edited by Javier97Z28; Oct 19, 2004 at 08:49 AM.
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
Originally Posted by sszapper
I was going to replace the timing chain while I am down there, but there isn't a whole lot of choices for a 94 and I don't want to convert to OBD II, so if I buy a new GM timing chain will that handle this cam?
You dont have to convert to OBD 2 to open your timing chain options, you just have to convert to the 95 opti. You have to get the 95 opti, 95 timing cover, 95 up cam, proper wiring harness from side of manifold to opti, and apropriate vacuume lines and fittings.
Since youre buying a cam that part would be taken care of.
I'll also note that I went from the 224/230 to the GM 847 cam in my 383 and picked up 4 mph and .5 tenths in the 1/4.
A cam has an application and if it is out of its domain it is not as efficient.
Last edited by WS Sick; Oct 19, 2004 at 09:18 AM.
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
Well I think I will go with the 224/230. I may go ahead and sneak in that cam gp before the deadline. You guys really helped me out, made it easier for me to decide.
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
this is changing my decision of buying the hotcam and getting the 224/230 , im looking to run atleast mid 12s on boltons and stock heads, seems the XE cams work just as good as teh hotcam in all rpms ranges but the XE produces more power,
anybody have dyno graphs of each of these cams???
anybody have dyno graphs of each of these cams???
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
I passed emissions with the 224/230 cam and tuning. It sounded great and ran great until something happened inside the motor that I still have yet to find.
Until that time, it ran unreal. I would never go smaller IMHO.
Until that time, it ran unreal. I would never go smaller IMHO.
Re: LT4 Hot cam vs. 218/224 vs. 224/230
I like the hot cam, I used it for about a year and a half, and it was great. The XE 224 guys (according to this thread) are running quicker than my hot cam, hooker LT, !cat set up was, but the hot cam is easy to live with, cheap to install (about $750 including the kit, gaskets, oil, coolant, head bolts (you don't have to replace your head gaskets, but I did just cause)) I made 345 rwhp & 346 Tq with the hot cam (275/310 stock) and ran a best of 12.9 on street tires (12.7 slicks) @ 110 MPH. With a 100 shot it made 425 rwhp & 491 TQ. And with a 150 shot it went 11.20 @ 123 MPH. It was a nice set up on a budget. I wouldn't get into bigger cams and such untill you do something with the heads/ intake, and by the time you do that chances are both of these cams are woefully inadequate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Speeds8erM-1
Drag Racing Technique
3
Aug 13, 2002 10:24 PM
Speeds8erM-1
Drag Racing Technique
1
Jul 28, 2002 06:18 PM



