Long tubes or shorties?
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Jet hots seem prety decent.
What headers would the best for hooking up the emission equipment and catalytic converters?
One more question, does anyone know how much hp/torque the stock cats rob? just curious.
What headers would the best for hooking up the emission equipment and catalytic converters?
One more question, does anyone know how much hp/torque the stock cats rob? just curious.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by GnarlyZ28
Jet hots seem prety decent.
What headers would the best for hooking up the emission equipment and catalytic converters?
One more question, does anyone know how much hp/torque the stock cats rob? just curious.
What headers would the best for hooking up the emission equipment and catalytic converters?
One more question, does anyone know how much hp/torque the stock cats rob? just curious.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by GnarlyZ28
One more question, does anyone know how much hp/torque the stock cats rob? just curious.
Exhaust components don't "rob" the car of power. They set an upper limit on power. An engine is an air pump, and the exhaust is the output. A restrictive exhaust limits the output.
That said, I have no idea what the upper limit would be on the stock cats, but I'd guess that it's probably close to 400rwhp.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
You're not asking the right question.
Exhaust components don't "rob" the car of power. They set an upper limit on power. An engine is an air pump, and the exhaust is the output. A restrictive exhaust limits the output.
That said, I have no idea what the upper limit would be on the stock cats, but I'd guess that it's probably close to 400rwhp.
Exhaust components don't "rob" the car of power. They set an upper limit on power. An engine is an air pump, and the exhaust is the output. A restrictive exhaust limits the output.
That said, I have no idea what the upper limit would be on the stock cats, but I'd guess that it's probably close to 400rwhp.
So are you saying that having that cats. does not cause any power loss under 400rwhp?
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by Bersaglieri
I and about 98% of everyone else would take LT's over shorties anyday including sunday. Everyone I have ever met or talked to who switched from shorties to longtubes have seen significant improvement. I guess those are all flukes
What other mods did you have to trap 107mph or was it just the magical shorties?
-Dustin-
What other mods did you have to trap 107mph or was it just the magical shorties?
-Dustin-
I'm not even going to repond the sarcasm.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by fireman
Ran 13.3 @ 106mph(2.0 60') with hooker shorties, CAI, and 4.10s. I believe you gain ahelluvalot more going from manifolds to shorties than from shorties to longtubes.
I installed my coated pacesetter longtubes last week...
I installed my coated pacesetter longtubes last week...
No ground clearance problems either.
Last edited by Joe 1320; Nov 11, 2005 at 04:57 PM.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Joe 1320...
I'm with you on the shorties to an extent...1 3/4" shorties are a whole different animal over 1 5/8"..I run the LPE 1 3/4" shorties and Random Y with gutted CAT and my time is in my sig. I am going to try the Kooks LTs 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 with the 3" Y. I waited until a company came out with LTs that have no ground clearance issues and still allowed the use of my Spohn TA which is set up for shorties..The Kooks are supposed to fit this application and should flow a little more. I'm at the point where every tenth is starting to cost some $$$ and I'm hoping for a couple with this new set up...I'm taking a $1200 risk that the new stuff will be better..we'll see. That being said I'm still a huge fan of Big tube shorties for a number of reasons. I even think that Fred (moderator) usually chimes in here with people he knows running shorties and flying...
For most people large tube shorties will work great...
--Alan
I'm with you on the shorties to an extent...1 3/4" shorties are a whole different animal over 1 5/8"..I run the LPE 1 3/4" shorties and Random Y with gutted CAT and my time is in my sig. I am going to try the Kooks LTs 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 with the 3" Y. I waited until a company came out with LTs that have no ground clearance issues and still allowed the use of my Spohn TA which is set up for shorties..The Kooks are supposed to fit this application and should flow a little more. I'm at the point where every tenth is starting to cost some $$$ and I'm hoping for a couple with this new set up...I'm taking a $1200 risk that the new stuff will be better..we'll see. That being said I'm still a huge fan of Big tube shorties for a number of reasons. I even think that Fred (moderator) usually chimes in here with people he knows running shorties and flying...
For most people large tube shorties will work great...
--Alan
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by ABA383
Joe 1320...
I'm with you on the shorties to an extent...1 3/4" shorties are a whole different animal over 1 5/8"..I run the LPE 1 3/4" shorties and Random Y with gutted CAT and my time is in my sig. I am going to try the Kooks LTs 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 with the 3" Y. I waited until a company came out with LTs that have no ground clearance issues and still allowed the use of my Spohn TA which is set up for shorties..The Kooks are supposed to fit this application and should flow a little more.
I'm with you on the shorties to an extent...1 3/4" shorties are a whole different animal over 1 5/8"..I run the LPE 1 3/4" shorties and Random Y with gutted CAT and my time is in my sig. I am going to try the Kooks LTs 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 with the 3" Y. I waited until a company came out with LTs that have no ground clearance issues and still allowed the use of my Spohn TA which is set up for shorties..The Kooks are supposed to fit this application and should flow a little more.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
whats wrong with edelbrock headers? i gained 3 mph and 4 tenths with them on a pretty much stock car? that a damn good improvement.
after i put in the hot cam in i dynoed 344.
well everyone was telling me that my headers were sucking up so much power... so i spent a grand on some flps... and dynoed 344
well worth the money
now that i've gone alot farther with the car im happy i went with them. but wasnt worth it on a daily driver.
so with that said, shorties are a great buy for someone on a budget looking to not loose any ground clearence
after i put in the hot cam in i dynoed 344.
well everyone was telling me that my headers were sucking up so much power... so i spent a grand on some flps... and dynoed 344
well worth the money
now that i've gone alot farther with the car im happy i went with them. but wasnt worth it on a daily driver.
so with that said, shorties are a great buy for someone on a budget looking to not loose any ground clearence
Last edited by blkchevyz; Nov 14, 2005 at 04:56 PM.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by blkchevyz
whats wrong with edelbrock headers? i gained 3 mph and 4 tenths with them on a pretty much stock car? that a damn good improvement.
after i put in the hot cam in i dynoed 344.
well everyone was telling me that my headers were sucking up so much power... so i spent a grand on some flps... and dynoed 344
well worth the money
now that i've gone alot farther with the car im happy i went with them. but wasnt worth it on a daily driver.
so with that said, shorties are a great buy for someone on a budget looking to not loose any ground clearence
after i put in the hot cam in i dynoed 344.
well everyone was telling me that my headers were sucking up so much power... so i spent a grand on some flps... and dynoed 344
well worth the money
now that i've gone alot farther with the car im happy i went with them. but wasnt worth it on a daily driver.
so with that said, shorties are a great buy for someone on a budget looking to not loose any ground clearence
-Dustin-
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Hold on, we're getting off track. Gnarly Z28: do you have to pass emissions? If not don't waste $$ on cats. Just run LTs and a 3" y-pipe no cats and 02 simulators, if you feel the police around you are basically cool. If you do have to pass emissions, just get an exhaust shop to weld in some 3" high flow cats into your LT y-pipe. Unless you want to drop your car, LT shouldn't cause ground clearance issues. If you don't have to pass a visual or sniff test emissions test, then get headers with no AIR or EGR, 3" y-pipe, no cats, no rear 02 sensors. Then get someone like MadZ28 to delete the EGR systems and such from your computer, eliminating trouble lights, and adding even more power in other ways (around $125 for tune, well worth it) This will be the cheapest way. around $400 headers, $120 y-pipe, $80 02 sims, then $125 tune (which is more HP gain than just exhaust)
shorties, and a stock y-pipe and cats will give you almost no noticable power gain as far as you can tell. (I'm sure the dyno, maybe even the track will read some gain, but not just your gut feeling)
shorties, and a stock y-pipe and cats will give you almost no noticable power gain as far as you can tell. (I'm sure the dyno, maybe even the track will read some gain, but not just your gut feeling)
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by Cmr0z28
Pacesetter LT's. See times in sig. Very easy installation, high quality, cheap price. Had them almost 2 years now and the coating has held up extremely well.
Re: Long tubes or shorties?
Originally Posted by NeverEverSatisfied
That could be your problem running those Pacesetters why you are stuck in the 13's. Customs are the way to go and then get them Jet Hot Coated... 

Re: Long tubes or shorties?
I wasn't really planning on turning my car into a full blown racer. I just wanted some extra power for on the street, i am also on a tight budget. If i were to go with a set of shorties and the stock dual cat y-pipe with my current mods would there be a somewhat noticeable increase in hp or torque?
Last edited by GnarlyZ28; Nov 15, 2005 at 03:33 PM.


