LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Long tubes or shorties?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #31  
GnarlyZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 135
From: BP MN
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Long tubes seem the best choice for performance, but i use my car mainly as a daily driver. I also don't quite have the money for the lt's. I think i will use the shorties, but maybe switch in the future. The edelbrock shorties are what i'm looking at.

Does anyone know any good choices for shorties?

Thanks again for the advice.
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #32  
ABA383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,903
From: Littlestown, PA
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

I have LPE shorties. They are stainless and I just had them coated from Jet Hot. They have been on the car since 1995 and have been great. I trap at over 118 mph with these things so I can't believe that they are costing me too much hp...I am thinking about the Kooks 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 based on advice from Joe O, but I'd say what I have is fairly free flowing...and Kooks are $$$...

A set of big tube (1 3/4") shorties should work fine for you and do for me...I dunno if LPE sells these things anymore, but if you want shorties look at anything with 1 3/4 tubes and get them Jet Hot coated inside and out...

--Alan
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #33  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Originally Posted by GnarlyZ28
Long tubes seem the best choice for performance, but i use my car mainly as a daily driver. I also don't quite have the money for the lt's. I think i will use the shorties, but maybe switch in the future. The edelbrock shorties are what i'm looking at.

Does anyone know any good choices for shorties?

Thanks again for the advice.
Please dont waste money on Edelbrocks...

RK Sport Midlengths for 94-95 cars is only $450.00 ceramic coated inside and out.

Pacesetters I think are a little over $450 for a set.

If you go with crap to begin with its going to cost you alot of time, money and frustration. I use LT's on my daily driver as well as everyone else I know with LT's.

What are edelbrocks $350? Not even coated Plus install material and time. The more time to take them out, get more install parts and time to put longtubes or good midlengths in. Plus extra cash to buy them, and getting less than half back what you paid for the edelbrocks new. Not to mention very high engine bay temps from uncoated headers and possible burnt components. All the while your making about 10-15 less HP than everyone with decent headers. Ask anyone who has edelbrocks who went to LT's. They'll tell you to do straight to LT's.

I am begging you man dont make the same mistake many others have.

-Dustin-
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #34  
GnarlyZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 135
From: BP MN
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

what would i need to do to get the lt's functioning properly? What would the steps be too remove the emission equipment, and what about the egr system?

One more question, what is a good brand of lt's that are coated and don't sacrifice ground clearance and underhood temp.

Thanks
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 01:29 AM
  #35  
Cerwin Vega Fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,115
From: Louisiana
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Originally Posted by GnarlyZ28
One more question, what is a good brand of lt's that are coated and don't sacrifice ground clearance and underhood temp.
To my knowledge the only LT's that are good on ground clearance are the Dynatech LT's and Kooks. I myself was looking into some Dynatech headers but I have heard to many install horror stories. I'm just going to bite the clearance bullent and go with Jet-Hot headers. LT's don't kill ground clearance that bad, I look at like this, if you don't scrap the air dam then odds are you won't scrap the headers.
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 06:51 AM
  #36  
Joe 1320's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 422
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

With a stock and unmodified engine, SLP shorties and random tech Y pipe got me to 13.0 at 107 mph with an automatic and stock converter. I think that speaks pretty well that the Y pipe combined with the shorties flows enough to produce decent times and not sacrifice ground clearance. It's also smog legal. Ironically, I did a Hooker long tube conversion and mufflex Y pipe for a friend on his 95 Z28. With a borla cat back and a stick shift he was only trapping 105 mph. He even had lower mileage than mine too. So much for shooting down the shorties.
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 06:55 AM
  #37  
Acct 23749's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 834
From: Fernandina Beach FL
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

No question whatsoever


Longtubes



if you want shortys, your better off sending me the money
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 08:00 AM
  #38  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Originally Posted by Joe 1320
So much for shooting down the shorties.
I and about 98% of everyone else would take LT's over shorties anyday including sunday. Everyone I have ever met or talked to who switched from shorties to longtubes have seen significant improvement. I guess those are all flukes

What other mods did you have to trap 107mph or was it just the magical shorties?

-Dustin-
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #39  
mustangmuncher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 388
From: Northeastern Ohio
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

I have the SLP dual cat shorties, and ran the times in sig... but after a stainless works y-pipe not fitting up right, I am making the switch to LT's... bought my buddys pacesetter uncoated LT's and y-pipe for 100 dollars even, the collecters need to be fixed up, but hey, I know can have a better exhaust no matter what, because the stock dual-cat y-pipe is horrible!
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #40  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

I love your sig "I should have just bought LT's "

-Dustin-
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #41  
GnarlyZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 135
From: BP MN
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

I was looking at some jet hot lt's

Would coated lt's be able to perform even in minnesota winters?

Does anyone know if any jet hot headers can accept the emission equipment
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #42  
Kreinmc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 622
From: Mesa, Az
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Originally Posted by Bersaglieri
I and about 98% of everyone else would take LT's over shorties anyday including sunday. Everyone I have ever met or talked to who switched from shorties to longtubes have seen significant improvement. I guess those are all flukes

What other mods did you have to trap 107mph or was it just the magical shorties?

-Dustin-
Have you had both? My last car with 1.6 rockers and mac shorties was much faster than my current car with LT's and 1.7 rockers. I picked up 1 mph with my LT's on this car and 5 mph with shorties on my last car. I think I am going to side with the 2% and go for some mac shorties. I spent close to a grand on my LT set up to gain 1 mph at the track over manifolds! Complete waste of cash if you ask me.
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:35 AM
  #43  
fireman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 814
From: Phoenix AZ
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Ran 13.3 @ 106mph(2.0 60') with hooker shorties, CAI, and 4.10s. I believe you gain ahelluvalot more going from manifolds to shorties than from shorties to longtubes.

I installed my coated pacesetter longtubes last week...
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #44  
mustangmuncher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 388
From: Northeastern Ohio
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Originally Posted by Bersaglieri
I love your sig "I should have just bought LT's "

-Dustin-
Well it used to say that, because I did buy some. the uncoated LT's and y-pipe for 100 dollars, the collecters need fixed though.. just a good reason to throw some flanges on there.
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #45  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: Long tubes or shorties?

Originally Posted by Kreinmc
Have you had both? My last car with 1.6 rockers and mac shorties was much faster than my current car with LT's and 1.7 rockers. I picked up 1 mph with my LT's on this car and 5 mph with shorties on my last car. I think I am going to side with the 2% and go for some mac shorties. I spent close to a grand on my LT set up to gain 1 mph at the track over manifolds! Complete waste of cash if you ask me.
Its always a good idea to to compare headers on the same car. Too many extra variables going from car to car for a fair assesment. I know several people who upon switching to longtubes from shorties on the same car gained MPH and faster ET's.

I'm not saying Mids and shorties are terrible, both are good. But when you can have LT's why waste your time and money? The only thing I would consider somewhat parallel to LT's are the AS&M series Mids.

-Dustin-



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.