LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #16  
z28_theantirice's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 297
From: Wisconsin
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Originally Posted by kyle97
Im confused as to why he's running rich though (unless he upgraded the injectors too, which I didn't see any mention of)

Assuming the fuel system is still sotck, the pcm should be able to acommodate the upgrades via fuel trims while he is cruising in close-loop non-PE. While he is in PE, if anything the car should be leaning out with all of the extra breathing ability.

The stock injecters would never beable to keep up with that setup
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #17  
kyle97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 179
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Originally Posted by z28_theantirice
The stock injecters would never beable to keep up with that setup
If hes just driving conservatively (non PE mode) then the trims should still be able to accommodate it. From what i've seen on cammed cars, the pcm actually needs to remove fuel at low rpm/low throttle points due to reversion.

If he's getting on it (in PE mode) then yeah if anything the car should run really lean, but he is saying the car is rich. Thats what doesnt make sense to me. A tune is a good idea, but i think one or more of his sensors is screwed up too.

Last edited by kyle97; Oct 23, 2006 at 05:39 PM.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #18  
Silvershark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,435
From: Alaska
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

More than likely he is getting knock retard due to the big cam and the longtubes on his stock tune. I didnt notice a LT4 knock module listed in his mods. That could very well be causing him to run rich during normal cruise mph and while stopped at lights etc. His car would only run lean at WOT and he would more than likely notice it due to fuel cut, however 80% of the time the car would be running rich trying to overcorrect due to all the noise from the cam/headers....

I could be totally off key here, but it sounds logical.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #19  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

If there are injectors in there and the computer doesn't know it will never be able to compensate for that.

Bret
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #20  
ozzyblackz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 43
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

thx a lot for all replies,mi car is runing like a crap,tomorrow i will change new plugs,do you now what is the exact Gap for the plugs for N/A ?,also mi car is overheating a little more than usual but i think is because of the termostat 160 and the fans are programed to start late,well i think with stock radiator ,and stock pump and more ´´power´´ without tune is normal to happend that,as they mentioned i will also put the lt4 knock module to prevent the knock retard.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #21  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

.035" will work for a gap.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #22  
remaxracer45's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,875
From: Wisconsin
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

make sure you are using the right plugs as well i'll look at my motor tomorrow and tell you what lloyd said to use. mine were wring in the beginning
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 11:15 PM
  #23  
ozzyblackz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 43
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

i bought NKG TR5´s i think that should work good.
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #24  
remaxracer45's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,875
From: Wisconsin
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

NGK VR7 is what Lloyd says to use with the LE2 setup
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #25  
69gto96z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,146
From: Denton/Rockwall, TX
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

I have used MadZ28 for my tune, and I have to say, maybe its just me, but I get crappy customer service. I e-mailed him over a week ago asking about a possible problem with my tune, and have heard nothing...
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #26  
KGRESOCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 824
From: LIVONIA MICH. USA
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Originally Posted by remaxracer45
NGK VR7 is what Lloyd says to use with the LE2 setup
I have a LE2 383 set up.....those plugs were too cold.
Much happier with TR6 or 103's.
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 10:53 AM
  #27  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Tow it to the tuner or you will be making more threads later trying to figure out why your car isn't running right.

Otherwise get a mail order tune from Ion.
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #28  
Sweetred95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
From: High Ridge, MO
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Originally Posted by kyle97
If hes just driving conservatively (non PE mode) then the trims should still be able to accommodate it. From what i've seen on cammed cars, the pcm actually needs to remove fuel at low rpm/low throttle points due to reversion.

If he's getting on it (in PE mode) then yeah if anything the car should run really lean, but he is saying the car is rich. Thats what doesnt make sense to me. A tune is a good idea, but i think one or more of his sensors is screwed up too.
You are totally correct, in theory. The computer should be able to compensate (BLM's) for the change in air flow, granted he didn't put bigger injectors in it. The problem comes when the car goes into closed loop and starts using the O2's. The cam has enough overlap to allow unburned fuel/air to enter the exhaust system. This unburned fuel/air is seen as a 'lean' condition. Remember, the O2 sensors detect how much oxygen is in the mix, not fuel, and in this case, it's seeing the increase in oxygen. The 'lean' condition will cause the PCM to try and compensate by making it richer and richer. Before long, the car is running extremely rich and the plugs are gas fouled. You can tune these things in closed loop, but it would take much longer than just tuning in open loop.

Also, for the OP, an LT4 KM will only filter out the noise of the valvetrain. Loud exhaust, clunking, etc. will cause KR and it won't necessarily go away with a LT4 KM.
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #29  
Tricked-Out-Toy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 840
From: Nashville, TN
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Originally Posted by Sweetred95ta
You are totally correct, in theory. The computer should be able to compensate (BLM's) for the change in air flow, granted he didn't put bigger injectors in it. The problem comes when the car goes into closed loop and starts using the O2's. The cam has enough overlap to allow unburned fuel/air to enter the exhaust system. This unburned fuel/air is seen as a 'lean' condition. Remember, the O2 sensors detect how much oxygen is in the mix, not fuel, and in this case, it's seeing the increase in oxygen. The 'lean' condition will cause the PCM to try and compensate by making it richer and richer. Before long, the car is running extremely rich and the plugs are gas fouled. You can tune these things in closed loop, but it would take much longer than just tuning in open loop.

Also, for the OP, an LT4 KM will only filter out the noise of the valvetrain. Loud exhaust, clunking, etc. will cause KR and it won't necessarily go away with a LT4 KM.
I know Ion said he can de sensitize the stock KM and you wouldnt have to get a LT4 KM. I was on the DYNO last weekend with the Stock KM and there was ZERO knock retard.
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #30  
kyle97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 179
Re: installed LLoyd elliot LE2

Originally Posted by Sweetred95ta
You are totally correct, in theory. The computer should be able to compensate (BLM's) for the change in air flow, granted he didn't put bigger injectors in it. The problem comes when the car goes into closed loop and starts using the O2's. The cam has enough overlap to allow unburned fuel/air to enter the exhaust system. This unburned fuel/air is seen as a 'lean' condition. Remember, the O2 sensors detect how much oxygen is in the mix, not fuel, and in this case, it's seeing the increase in oxygen. The 'lean' condition will cause the PCM to try and compensate by making it richer and richer. Before long, the car is running extremely rich and the plugs are gas fouled. You can tune these things in closed loop, but it would take much longer than just tuning in open loop.
Let me make sure I understand you:
You are saying that in closed loop, the cam overlap causes a false lean condition which will cause the trims to drift richer and richer over time?

But then how could you ever get a closed loop tune that worked? No matter how you set the airflow tables up, unburnt a/f will always get in to the exhaust and always cause a false lean and cause the computer to add more fuel than desired.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.