LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Idle Emissions FAIL

Old Jul 13, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

AC Delco/Delphi. Do not use Bosch.

Yes, an O2 sensor can give faulty readings without setting a code. Or the wiring can be shorting out, causing a bad signal, and not set a code. But that problem would most likely not affect both sides of the engine, unless the problem is due to contamination with lead from the fuel or silicates/phosphorus from the coolant.

Last edited by Injuneer; Jul 14, 2011 at 11:28 PM.
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 11:28 PM
  #17  
Misfit74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
From: Vancouver, WA
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

No significant exhaust leaks found after an shop inspection today. Next up: two new O2 sensors which are on the way. I'll update again after that.

Feedback always welcome!
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 09:55 PM
  #18  
cthomson21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 131
From: Tennessee
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

Another thought also, check your intake manifold gasket. Just spray some carb cleaner around the seal, and if the motor revs up some then its bad. I say this because it happened to a friend of mine. Car was pulling air in and showing a lean code on one side, and then wasn't properly burning the extra gas being put in. I don't know how much of a problem that is on these cars though because of the reverse cooling system. But only costs about 5 dollars to check.
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 10:15 PM
  #19  
Misfit74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
From: Vancouver, WA
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

The new o2 sensors have been installed. One of them was a major f@#king PITA! (passenger side).

The car hits closed-loop right at 205 seconds. I've recorded some new data, but don't yet know if the HC problem/extra-fuel at idle/false-lean condition problems have been corrected. I hope to know more soon. Love the feedback.
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 10:03 AM
  #20  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

Still adding extra fuel at idle, with Cell 16 BLMs of 142 (+10.9%) left and 146 (+13.3%) right.

Under load, left side is still bad in cells 9 and 14 with 14x BLM's, while the problem minimizes on the right side. 15 and a couple of others are close to 140 on the left, not on the right.

That MAP still looks high at idle - 50kPA at idle in middle of the log (idling in gear), and then drops to a more reasonable 40kPa in the idle period toward the end of the log (idling in neutral). The TPS looks steady closed throttle at 0.61V, so that issue is gone. Still some signs of knock retard, but not as bad as before.

I'm surprised it went into closed loop at 206 seconds. The coolant temp was only 109.9. The coolant seems to take a long time to warm up - took 10 minutes to reach 180*F. Low coolant temps will elevate HC and CO.
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #21  
Misfit74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
From: Vancouver, WA
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

Originally Posted by Injuneer
Still adding extra fuel at idle, with Cell 16 BLMs of 142 (+10.9%) left and 146 (+13.3%) right.

Under load, left side is still bad in cells 9 and 14 with 14x BLM's, while the problem minimizes on the right side. 15 and a couple of others are close to 140 on the left, not on the right.

That MAP still looks high at idle - 50kPA at idle in middle of the log (idling in gear), and then drops to a more reasonable 40kPa in the idle period toward the end of the log (idling in neutral). The TPS looks steady closed throttle at 0.61V, so that issue is gone. Still some signs of knock retard, but not as bad as before.

I'm surprised it went into closed loop at 206 seconds. The coolant temp was only 109.9. The coolant seems to take a long time to warm up - took 10 minutes to reach 180*F. Low coolant temps will elevate HC and CO.
Invaluable feedback. Thanks, Fred!

A couple of things:

It looks like I need to completely rule out ANY exhaust problems. Although there isn't a leak deemed noteworthy by the local guy, there is evidence of a small damage to one of the exhaust manifold gaskets. It probably best to replace the exhaust manifold gaskets before moving too far forward to 100% rule out anything there affecting the car.

I did get a couple of misses early on in the road test when giving gas at low speeds or from stop. Probably need to check the plugs for any problems - though they are new within the past 6 mos or so (as are the wires).

Based on the ScanMaster tutorial (http://www.injuneer.com/ScanMast.html) it says:

"You engine can not run lean or rich in closed loop, unless the control system is not working, or the oxygen sensors are providing incorrect information. They will provide incorrect information if the are defective, there is an exhaust leak, there is a leaky injector, or there is a miss."

That brings me questions about the control system and what things I can do?

I'm curious what causes the MAP to be high at times? I wonder if I should replace the MAP sensor - can it read incorrectly if failing similar to the O2 sensors?

The coolant issue is also confusing, but my last run to emissions I had the car up to 210 degrees at test time based on the dash temp gauge. The thermostat is recently new and 180 degree. Could this be as simple as too high a coolant to water ratio or is the coolant temp sensor a possible culprit here?

Also, based on what I'm reading, double and triple-checking for a vacuum leak will be in the plan.

Last edited by Misfit74; Jul 17, 2011 at 08:23 PM.
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 03:36 PM
  #22  
Misfit74's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
From: Vancouver, WA
Re: Idle Emissions FAIL

Update 7-22-11:

After the new O2 sensors and other work did not fix the high HCs at idle, I laid down the dough for an emissions waiver from a local shop (150.00). They did some testing to try and ID the problem. They did a cylinder kill-test - I don't know the formal name for it if there is one. They killed one cylinder at a time and recorded the difference in RPMs, etc. and found the two cylinders, #4 and #8 were 'weaker' than the others.

Figuring it would be either injectors, plugs/plug wire (which are newish), or an internal engine issue it was suggested to go over those things, including a compression test.

The compression test may not have been done exactly right, but I think we got the info we needed. We tested 3 cylinders total with only one plug removed at a time and did not block open the intake, which after some reading after the fact I learned should be done (ty shbox). As you probably know, 8 is especially a PITA to get to. Compression test results:

#4 read above 150psi.
#8 read approx 118-122psi.
#3 read 150-160psi.

These results lead me to think next is a 'Leak-Down' test. Again there are no codes, and vacuum and exhaust leaks have been all but eliminated. Occasional 'misses' (from 8, I suspect) and a low RPM/Idle 'slower than optimum get-off' are the current symptoms beside the high HC idle emissions. All other emissions passed just fine. Don't need a re-test until 2013, so my main concern is not that.

Do I spend money on a leakdown test or save my money knowing there will have to be some engine work done? Will I cause damage if I continue driving for awhile while I build up some funds? What types of things should I start concerning myself with?

Thoughts and feedback on what to do next appreciated.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KYWes
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Jun 14, 2022 06:52 AM
C4m4roJoe
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
6
Jul 19, 2015 10:59 PM
Dark Zeiro
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Jul 19, 2015 08:25 AM
big_mac421
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jul 13, 2015 03:48 PM
cristian1311
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Jun 27, 2015 11:55 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.