I can tell you how to improve PERFORMANCE and GAS mileage IN HERE
The MAP sensor is on top of the throttle body. There is a small black plastic piece to one side with a connector running to it, help in by one bolt. Remove the bolt, and the chip should pop out, that's the MAP sensor. If black smoke is present it will be the exhaust that is black, basically the car will be running rich.
Originally posted by gelbza
The MAP sensor is on top of the throttle body. There is a small black plastic piece to one side with a connector running to it, help in by one bolt. Remove the bolt, and the chip should pop out, that's the MAP sensor. If black smoke is present it will be the exhaust that is black, basically the car will be running rich.
The MAP sensor is on top of the throttle body. There is a small black plastic piece to one side with a connector running to it, help in by one bolt. Remove the bolt, and the chip should pop out, that's the MAP sensor. If black smoke is present it will be the exhaust that is black, basically the car will be running rich.
Originally posted by gelbza
The MAP sensor is on top of the throttle body. There is a small black plastic piece to one side with a connector running to it, help in by one bolt. Remove the bolt, and the chip should pop out, that's the MAP sensor. If black smoke is present it will be the exhaust that is black, basically the car will be running rich.
The MAP sensor is on top of the throttle body. There is a small black plastic piece to one side with a connector running to it, help in by one bolt. Remove the bolt, and the chip should pop out, that's the MAP sensor. If black smoke is present it will be the exhaust that is black, basically the car will be running rich.
This thread is really getting out of control.....
Sorry, my mistake, it's actually right behind the TB on the manifold, passenger side, with a green connector coming up from the bottom. And yes all 95's should have them, it's backup in case the MAF sensor fails, in which case the car will switch back to SD programming.
Damn, Fred beat me to it before I could correct my mistake!
Damn, Fred beat me to it before I could correct my mistake!
Originally posted by Blue96z28
does anyone have a pic on the engine compartment where they could point out the MAP sensor. I still do not know its location?
does anyone have a pic on the engine compartment where they could point out the MAP sensor. I still do not know its location?
http://anasazi.sytes.net/longtubes/install/MVC-396S.JPG
Originally posted by anasazi
the only sensor on top of the manifold, behind the throttle body
http://anasazi.sytes.net/longtubes/install/MVC-396S.JPG
the only sensor on top of the manifold, behind the throttle body
http://anasazi.sytes.net/longtubes/install/MVC-396S.JPG
I can't believe this..... someone posts a rambling message of how a new MAP sensor is a "cure all" for everything wrong with your car, and there is a feeding frenzy like a bunch of pirhana's on a 3-day old corpse. I already see people with new posts asking for the part number, where to buy it, what about a high performance one, etc.
Rob/Shoebox had the best advice... .if it ain't broke, it doesn't need to be fixed. 800 nitrous HP and my engine runs fine with the stock MAP sensor.... even after a major nitrous "pop" in the intake manifold.
If there is a weak link, its the flimsy harness connector that eventually crumbles and falls apart, but that's on the wiring harness, not on the sensor - no, I don't know the part number or where to buy a high performance connector
Save your money.
Rob/Shoebox had the best advice... .if it ain't broke, it doesn't need to be fixed. 800 nitrous HP and my engine runs fine with the stock MAP sensor.... even after a major nitrous "pop" in the intake manifold.
If there is a weak link, its the flimsy harness connector that eventually crumbles and falls apart, but that's on the wiring harness, not on the sensor - no, I don't know the part number or where to buy a high performance connector

Save your money.
yeah the clip is broke on my senser i just taped it up, oh and the radio i sent you only ran 4 speakers no subs i have a convertible ya know and also everyone i joined the navy today
Originally posted by Dmx4ever3
yeah the clip is broke on my senser i just taped it up, oh and the radio i sent you only ran 4 speakers no subs i have a convertible ya know and also everyone i joined the navy today
yeah the clip is broke on my senser i just taped it up, oh and the radio i sent you only ran 4 speakers no subs i have a convertible ya know and also everyone i joined the navy today
It's either 3 [2 front with rear sub]or 5[2 front 2 wing and rear sub]..
Originally posted by Mtrhds94Z
There is no '4 speaker' system Bose for 4th gen F body..
It's either 3 [2 front with rear sub]or 5[2 front 2 wing and rear sub]..
There is no '4 speaker' system Bose for 4th gen F body..
It's either 3 [2 front with rear sub]or 5[2 front 2 wing and rear sub]..
Originally posted by toby360
I have a 95 vert and i swear it has 4 bose speakers and no sub...
I have a 95 vert and i swear it has 4 bose speakers and no sub...
it does sound like my sole 94 rear speaker is getting more juice than before.
like two clicks of vol is now way louder, like half way up used to be, and kinda distorted on the low end.
so the stated 4-speaker vert setup sends more juice? it looks exactly the same as the 94 HU ....
Last edited by MrBigXL; Jun 28, 2003 at 03:49 AM.


