LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Hey all, I'm back. Going to try this again...get the 383 running.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #91  
TQdrivenws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,454
From: MN/WI
Re: Hey all, I'm back. Going to try this again...get the 383 running.

The IAC count can certainly go to zero, that is when the computer is trying to lower the idle, but you either have the throttle blades proped too far open or you have a vacuum leak.

As far as the TPS voltage, .9v is the high limit of the computers acceptable range, and IIRC .2v is the low limit. The car goes into PE mode (WOT fueling and timing) when you hit a certain TPS value. So the legendary mod that you speak of would get you into PE mode at a lower actual throttle position. This isn't necessary in a car that is in proper tune, and the TPS is used for so many part throttle tables that I like to give it a larger range of values to work with.
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #92  
Dave88LX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,168
From: AACO, MD
Re: Hey all, I'm back. Going to try this again...get the 383 running.

Yeah I probably have the blades cracked too far...

Thanks for the TPS info!
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #93  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Hey all, I'm back. Going to try this again...get the 383 running.

Originally Posted by Dave88LX
Gotcha...I think my IAC count is at ZERO right now, not sure how that works. I guess I have to close the TB blade some.

Curious...what's it matter between .45-.90V? As long as it's under 1V it shouldn't matter right?

One of the legendary "Mustang 5.0" mods is to set the TPS voltage to .98. Supposedly, it is in theory supposed to but you right on the edge of "off idle" in regards to TPS, instead of having to rotate the TB blades the distance required for .5V before the PCM realizes it's off-idle...something to think about I guess, maybe someone can chime in...
Mustangs are lean and the .95V is to richen it up quicker when ya get in it. Thats' mostly for stock ones too.
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #94  
MEAN LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,983
From: Jacksonville,fla
Re: Hey all, I'm back. Going to try this again...get the 383 running.

Wow, you have a stock cai, that need to be changed asap.
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 01:22 AM
  #95  
Dave88LX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,168
From: AACO, MD
Re: Hey all, I'm back. Going to try this again...get the 383 running.

Yeah I do. I ran out of budget.

"But it's got a K&N!!!"
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
94Z28LS1toLT1
LT1 Based Engine Tech
13
Apr 30, 2015 05:19 PM
cheapchevy
LT1 Based Engine Tech
11
Apr 8, 2015 08:48 PM
nballisru
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Dec 14, 2014 05:01 PM
globalprojeff
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
Dec 6, 2014 04:18 PM
globalprojeff
Wheels and Tires
1
Dec 6, 2014 04:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.