View Poll Results: which choice
option A
4
26.67%
option B
8
53.33%
option C
3
20.00%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll
help on cam choice
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,705
From: Kansas
help on cam choice
alright, so, motors been on its way for a while now, and i finally want to get it done
a)242/248 584/579(with 1.5s)
b) 243/251 560/565 (with 1.5s)
c)neither
my goals are i want low 11's and decent streetability. I will be running probably a 3200-3600 stall, and 3.73 gears
a)242/248 584/579(with 1.5s)
b) 243/251 560/565 (with 1.5s)
c)neither
my goals are i want low 11's and decent streetability. I will be running probably a 3200-3600 stall, and 3.73 gears
Moderator
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Those cams, assuming similar lobe profiles and lsa, are within a gnats hair of each other. They are also both high lift for street cams and you better have top quality springs to get decent spring life.
Rich
Rich
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
I thought I posted it, but the lift on A is with 1.6 RR. Check the comp cams lobe catalog if you don't believe me. Summit isn't always right.
I chose the second cam, btw. I like the Lunati lobes a little better, for some reason... (hint: high lift and low lsa)
I chose the second cam, btw. I like the Lunati lobes a little better, for some reason... (hint: high lift and low lsa)
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,705
From: Kansas
yeah, im leaning towards the lunati. I will get w/e springs they recommend probably, or maybe some PACs or 941s. For drivability, would the 2nd cam (lunati 60123) affect it too much?
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
Well, that's a really big cam for the street, so yeh, I would say it would affect drivability a good bit. The springs they recommend for their cams seem to be very small. I think the one they said would be good for the 60122 had 100lbs of seat pressure? I would use beehives no matter what, though. They rev a lot better among other things.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,705
From: Kansas
sorry, it will be a 383, flat top pistons w/ -5cc valve relief, ported trickflow heads (64cc chambers)
I talked to a local car guru, and he told me the bigger cam (2nd one) and try to get it ground so i can do the 4-7 plug wire swap, and on like a 112 LSA instead of the 110, what do u guys think?
I talked to a local car guru, and he told me the bigger cam (2nd one) and try to get it ground so i can do the 4-7 plug wire swap, and on like a 112 LSA instead of the 110, what do u guys think?
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
sorry, it will be a 383, flat top pistons w/ -5cc valve relief, ported trickflow heads (64cc chambers)
I talked to a local car guru, and he told me the bigger cam (2nd one) and try to get it ground so i can do the 4-7 plug wire swap, and on like a 112 LSA instead of the 110, what do u guys think?
I talked to a local car guru, and he told me the bigger cam (2nd one) and try to get it ground so i can do the 4-7 plug wire swap, and on like a 112 LSA instead of the 110, what do u guys think?
Why 64cc chambers?
