LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Fairly Dumb Oxygen Sensor Questions.

Old Mar 26, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #1  
wildweasel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
Fairly Dumb Oxygen Sensor Questions.

A while back I put in two new NTK 02 sensors and everything was fine. After a couple weeks I started to get 0153 (bank 2 slow response). I switched the sensors and the code went to the other side (0133); so I knew I had a bad sensor. I ordered another NTK sensor and put it in the other day. STILL getting 0133. I did ding the new sensor against my oil pan lightly while maneuvering under the car, so maybe it's my fault; but still I'm starting to get pissed at these things. OK, so not being in a hurry to spend (another) 50 bucks, am I hurting anything if I'm driving around with this code for a while? The car runs normally, I can't discern any difference when the code is on or off. Also, how bad of an idea is it to run 02's that are different brands? I'm starting to get leery of the NTK's and wanna try something else, but I'd hate to buy two new sensors when I know the one is OK. Thanks
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 05:42 AM
  #2  
Guest47904's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
NEVER ever use aftermarket O2s. I have a couple of vehicles, none if which can tolerate them. It was explained to me that even though most O2s are made by the same company, a few use less numbers that operate in a wider range than a lot of vehicles can use.

What you want are either GM or AC Delco both made by Standard.

Oh yeah, one of the items in the check list for your problem is contamination. Fuel, oil, coolant or improper sealant. Did you do any repairs lately? What about coolant level?
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #3  
wildweasel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by speedygonzales

Oh yeah, one of the items in the check list for your problem is contamination. Fuel, oil, coolant or improper sealant. Did you do any repairs lately? What about coolant level?
I don't think contamination is a factor, since the code followed the first sensor over, and hasn't returned to bank 2.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
mrmint69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,731
From: Post Falls, Idaho
I bought my last set for $38 each on Ebay now i only see them for $75+ if you can find them at all. Ac Delco or you will be dealing with this a lot. They last a long time and $150 for a pair is still a good deal. Aftermarket 02's $50 and then $50 and on and on. Using Ac Delco 02's, priceless
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 05:40 AM
  #5  
Guest47904's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
Originally Posted by wildweasel
I don't think contamination is a factor, since the code followed the first sensor over, and hasn't returned to bank 2.


Sorry but contamination many times goes away after the engine runs for a while. However, until it goes away, it wipes out the sensor. Capish.

You proved the sensor was bad, I was making a point or more precisely asking the question of "did you do some repair that may have included a potential contaminate like RTV or any other type of gasket material?????
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #6  
wildweasel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by mrmint69
I bought my last set for $38 each on Ebay now i only see them for $75+ if you can find them at all. Ac Delco or you will be dealing with this a lot. They last a long time and $150 for a pair is still a good deal. Aftermarket 02's $50 and then $50 and on and on. Using Ac Delco 02's, priceless
Yes, I ordered some on ebay the other day that were about 40 bucks for a pair. Borg Warner I think. Anyway, I'll try them and see, then spring for AC Delcos I guess. It's kinda funny, cause the original sensors were so messed up the car wouldn't even run until it was warm... and they never tripped a single code.
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #7  
wildweasel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by speedygonzales


Sorry but contamination many times goes away after the engine runs for a while. However, until it goes away, it wipes out the sensor. Capish.

You proved the sensor was bad, I was making a point or more precisely asking the question of "did you do some repair that may have included a potential contaminate like RTV or any other type of gasket material?????
I see where you were going. No, I haven't done any repairs, and I'm not losing any coolant that I know of. I did use some exhaust sealant on my EGR pipe, but that's in bank two, which is problem fee.
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #8  
94studcar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
sorry to highjack the thread but i have a dumb O2 question. i'm putting mac mid tubes on when i install my rebuilt engine, im not putting any egr stuff back and im not really concerned with polution stuff. i know some headers dont have O2 bungs and some people weld them shut. would i need to use O2 sensors and if so how will they help me?
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,115
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
The PCM needs the O2 sensors to fuel the engine. The PCM uses feedback from the pre-cat O2 sensors to hold the A/F ratio, dithering it slightly above and below 14.7:1 so the cats will work. In addition to helping emissions, it keeps the engine operating at a fairly decent fuel economy. And, it allows the PCM to adapt to minor changes in the enginie's condition's and mod's. To run without the sensors, you would have to have the PCM programmed to run continually in open loop. Doing that would prevent the PCM from achieving good fuel mileage, and adjusting to changes to the engine. Losing control of the A/F ratio will also lead to conditions where it may run excessively rich, or excessively lean.

If you want to run an open loop tune, keep the O2 sensor bungs on the exhaust so you can run a wide-band O2 sensor (or sensors) and keep track of the A/F ratio and avoid conditions that could damage the engine.

Not to say it can't be done... I run an open loop tune on an aftermarket ECU. But the setup required extensive dyno time and periodic verification on the dyno.
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #10  
dangalla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
when you swapped the sensor from side to side did you also swap the o2 sensor extension
Old Mar 29, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #11  
wildweasel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by dangalla
when you swapped the sensor from side to side did you also swap the o2 sensor extension
Nope.
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:02 AM
  #12  
thecrow462's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 70
From: Stow, MA
Originally Posted by speedygonzales
NEVER ever use aftermarket O2s. I have a couple of vehicles, none if which can tolerate them. It was explained to me that even though most O2s are made by the same company, a few use less numbers that operate in a wider range than a lot of vehicles can use.

What you want are either GM or AC Delco both made by Standard.

Oh yeah, one of the items in the check list for your problem is contamination. Fuel, oil, coolant or improper sealant. Did you do any repairs lately? What about coolant level?
I'm posting for anyone that has this problem in the future. Recently, I had been having what I thought was a misfire, but turned out to be more of a hesitation/stumble. It was doing this during idle and partial load. Also running rich. The car has 100k and the plugs and wires looked original so I replaced those (Boy was that a hellish initiation into the LT1 society). I found cracked wires and assumed that was part of the problem. I also found that all four plugs on the left side were black and all the ones on the right were normal gray. My Dad really knows his stuff about cars. Even though he really isn't familiar with late model chevys, the only part he could think of that has an impact on all four cylinders on one side is the oxygen sensor. We took a torch to the new one and the old one and noticed that the new one cycled faster and in a broader range of mV's, so we took that as evidence we were on the right track. So I replaced that too. But, I replaced it with a Walker o2 sensory (cheap Chinese POS), not even a Bosch.

At first, things seemed all right. But, the problem slowly returned. And, WORSE. The car is a DD, so I had to keep driving it. It got to the point where the car bogged so bad under partial load, it jarred the whole car. It was also idling very poorly. The tone of the exhaust changed, which I also read will happen. So ANNOYING! My freakin car!

At this point, I started thinking it might be the Opti. "Oh God no," I said to myself. Did get things dirty when I changed the plugs and wires? I thought the problem came back right after I had hit a big puddle in the rain and I figured I had moisture in the Opti (Even though it's a 95 and is vented). But, this must have just been coincidence. I read a ton of threads on that subject and eventually got under the car with my Dad's heat gun. That didn't work and thank God I didn't melt the damn thing.

When the problem came back worse, the car now started throwing Code 44 - lean condition in the left bank from the o2. Anyway, I knew from reading up that there were other possibilities that could explain this other than just not having a non-delco/gm o2 sensor, but I really had a good feeling that was it. Threw that in about a half an hour ago and my baby is back to normal!

So, I wanted to post this to help anyone with these problems in the future and to thank everyone else who was on this board because with your help I was able to diagnose the real problem and not just throw parts at it. Thank you!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt1son
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
May 27, 2015 10:35 AM
LT14LIFE
Parts For Sale
13
Feb 9, 2015 09:35 PM
cmdeshon
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
Dec 27, 2014 10:06 AM
Brian Wheeler
LS1 Based Engine Tech
6
Jul 26, 2002 03:14 PM
busta9876
LS1 Based Engine Tech
0
Jun 28, 2002 02:22 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.