LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 10:51 PM
  #31  
Sleeper_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 515
From: Indiana, USA
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Ahh I got ya! Well good luck then. Just drive it out of the hole like your going to the store. Then get harder and harder on your launch till you spin. Thats how I did it the first time I went to the track with a stick car and by the end of the night I was happy with my results (13.71@99mph with a bone stock LT1/6-speed and 3.23 gears).

Jeremy
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 06:48 AM
  #32  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by shady_ws6
Having a wideband shoved in the tailpipe is going to producer a leaner graph...
Not true... as mentioned already you have offroad pipes, so it shouldnt matter how far the sensor is. BTW, I have done various testing on marine engines with and without cats there was only a .1-.2 difference in A/F. Placement of O2 didint really affect A/F (when not using cats).

Great #'s BTW.

Last edited by RealQuick; Sep 10, 2006 at 06:52 AM.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #33  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by shady_ws6
I better at least be in the 13's....

I'm gonna say 13.4
With 36xrwhp? Dude you should be able to lob off a full second from that estimate if not more.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 07:53 AM
  #34  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by 97bowtie
STD numbers are going to be ~ 2% less,
Not always the case. Perhaps in your area, but for other geographical locations/weather conditions which are closer to sea level the SAE can/will be lower than actual.

Last edited by SS RRR; Sep 10, 2006 at 07:56 AM.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #35  
shady_ws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 122
From: St. Louis
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by SS RRR
With 36xrwhp? Dude you should be able to lob off a full second from that estimate if not more.
I agree... can't wait till tuesday ... test n tune
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #36  
brokeTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 176
From: St. Louis MO.
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by SS RRR
Not always the case. Perhaps in your area, but for other geographical locations/weather conditions which are closer to sea level the SAE can/will be lower than actual.

It was corrected on the sheet already. Correction where we live is a hair over 1%.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #37  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by SS RRR
Not always the case. Perhaps in your area, but for other geographical locations/weather conditions which are closer to sea level the SAE can/will be lower than actual.
STD numbers are NOT the same thing as actual - uncorrected numbers are actual. STD numbers are always higher than SAE because STD is correcting for *better* conditions than SAE. And yes, actual (uncorrected) numbers can be higher or lower than both STD and SAE.

Last edited by 97bowtie; Sep 10, 2006 at 11:54 AM.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #38  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by 97bowtie
STD numbers are NOT the same thing as actual - uncorrected numbers are actual. STD numbers are always higher than SAE because STD is correcting for *better* conditions than SAE. And yes, actual (uncorrected) numbers can be higher or lower than both STD and SAE.
I've always thought of STD numbers as some sort of figure you wait in line for at the free clinic. Never heard of STD numbers before. Sounds really pointless.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #39  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by SS RRR
I've always thought of STD numbers as some sort of figure you wait in line for at the free clinic. Never heard of STD numbers before. Sounds really pointless.
Cute. STD numbers basically just inflate dyno numbers. IMO, SAE are the only numbers that should be handed out by dyno shops...not that peak dyno numbers mean **** anyways.
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #40  
mad scientist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 44
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

I'm the tuner. The AFR is exactly what the engine wants, it's perfect. What you see from tailpipe readings is NOT the same as readings before the manifold collector flange(Due to dynamic piston speed. WB latency issues effect ONLY the displayed fuel curve, not average AFR). Bill was told to "live" with the car for a bit and find any small issues. I'll resolve any surging problems the best way possible. The CC306 is not the best DD but it's very streetable. Honestly, I didn't think it would make that much power!

*THIS CAR HOLDS THE LT1 "CAM ONLY" (DYNO) RECORD!!!*

-Tim Rotter
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 08:49 PM
  #41  
shady_ws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 122
From: St. Louis
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by mad scientist
I'm the tuner. The AFR is exactly what the engine wants, it's perfect. What you see from tailpipe readings is NOT the same as readings before the manifold collector flange(Due to dynamic piston speed. WB latency issues effect ONLY the displayed fuel curve, not average AFR). Bill was told to "live" with the car for a bit and find any small issues. I'll resolve any surging problems the best way possible. The CC306 is not the best DD but it's very streetable. Honestly, I didn't think it would make that much power!

*THIS CAR HOLDS THE LT1 "CAM ONLY" (DYNO) RECORD!!!*

-Tim Rotter

Thanks Tim.... CAM ONLY RECORD?? You messin with me or does it really????
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 09:09 PM
  #42  
Matts97camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 151
From: Ga
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Very impressive numbers. I looked at your car pics. Great looking WS6 !!
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 09:14 PM
  #43  
shady_ws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 122
From: St. Louis
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by Matts97camaro
Very impressive numbers. I looked at your car pics. Great looking WS6 !!
Thanks man...

For the looks... I owe owe that to ZAINO
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #44  
TransAm396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,125
From: Connecticut
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by shady_ws6
I better at least be in the 13's....

I'm gonna say 13.4

I did 13.4 on STREET tires in my 93 TA with 6speed 3.73's CAI, 1.6r and CAT-BACK exhaust. You should beat that. Oh and a 2.2 60'
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 10:42 PM
  #45  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Re: DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)

Originally Posted by mad scientist

*THIS CAR HOLDS THE LT1 "CAM ONLY" (DYNO) RECORD!!!*

-Tim Rotter
No it doesn't, compare apples to apples and post SAE #'s if you want to talk about the cam only record. Anyone can inflate the dyno #'s by posting the SAE #'s. And if you are a tuner and use STD #'s, thats pretty sad.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.