LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Dyno numbers for my 93

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #1  
93 Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 16
From: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
Dyno numbers for my 93

Went to the dyno the other day and I figured I would post the numbers. Let me know what you guys think.

Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #2  
toegead93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 616
From: West Palm Beach, FL
What are your mods?
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #3  
93 Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 16
From: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
My mods are 1.6 roller rockers, light weight flywheel, arizona speed marine headers to a loudmouth, march underdrive pulleys, and cold air intake.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
shox9879's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 69
From: Baton Rouge
93z

93s rock
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
sean1997ws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 338
Pretty good numbers for the modds. what are you running in the QT. I have never dynoed but i have pretty much the same modds . makes me very curious.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:03 PM
  #6  
93 Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 16
From: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
The best i have managed in the quarter was a 13.3 at 105.6 with a 2.3 60. It was spinning pretty good in 1st and second. Im going to get drag radials wich will let me get out of the whole a lot better. I am pretty sure i can hit twelves.
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
toegead93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 616
From: West Palm Beach, FL
You should have no problem hitting 12's with a good 60ft time. Good luck. I'd like to dyno mine sometime, maybe this summer?

oh by the way...93's rock!
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #8  
93 Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 16
From: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
I agree 93's are great cars
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #9  
truedualws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Looks like good numbers to me. I was wondering
how you manage 340 on the torque side. I have
just basic add ons and have about the same HP
but a lot less torque.
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 06:23 AM
  #10  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Gotta love us SD guys. NICE NUMBERS. Kinda give me an idea somewhat of where I was with my bolt on setup.

93 Z28, check out the speed density website, link in sig. It's a similar forum to this, just for 92-93 LT1 cars.
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 06:47 AM
  #11  
KEITHZ06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 104
From: BURLINGTON,MASS
I Started out with similar mods and then I got carried away. But I agree with the others 93's are special cars.
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 06:51 AM
  #12  
IDOXLR8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,784
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Nice numbers Have you ever though of an AFPR? I picked up 10 rwhp and 17 rwtq with this mod.
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #13  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Man, all the '93 owners are coming out of the woodworks. :P Well...at least my interior is nicer. jk Pretty good numbers man.
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #14  
vmatt350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 122
From: Valdosta, GA
Yup! Great numbers dude!

Gives me some hope that my RWHP might be close to 300. I just need to get some headers. I have never dynoed mine but have run a best QT of 13.6@105. That was bad driving plus I have a few more little things done since then.

I was begining to think that no one cared for the 93s after all the "what year is best" posts.

Keep up the good work.

Matt
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #15  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
I remember when I took my 93 to the track for the first time. It was march of 94and there was a guy in a new 6 speed 94 Z there, needless to say stock to stock there was a big difference between the two I ran a 14.1 to his 14.5 my mph was 100.3 and his was a 98 something. The thing responded really well to bolt ons too, it wasnt until I did heads and cams that the SD gave me some headahes, but once the tune was nailed down it hauled butt.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.