differences between N/A and all-motor
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
Originally Posted by Sandman_97Z
Are you guys really serious about this argument?
What difference does it make? Who friggin' cares?
What difference does it make? Who friggin' cares?

Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
Originally Posted by 944v8inDFW
HAS THE ORIGIONAL POSTER OF THIS THREADS QUESTION BEEN ANSWERED?
least we turn this into a farting contest
I Am Sofa King We Todd Ed
least we turn this into a farting contest
I Am Sofa King We Todd Ed
will agree that N/A means no nitrous just because that's what the majority (and I'm not talking about this board only) agrees on.Since the gentleman above stated a valid debate topic, I would like to make it a little more interesting and debate on whether farting is actually a form of exhaling
or just forced exduction? 
Further, if you fart naturally, is it considered an all-fart? Is chili or beans considered as "boost"?
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
Only if you fart without thinking about it is "natural" otherwise its forced thus not natural. I would say it's not so much a method of "exhaling" as much as it is a means to "vent."
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
As someone who grew up around racing and now road races professionally, THEY ARE THE SAME THING!!! The people saying that N2O is natural and not forced in, are the reason I rarely visit this board anymore...this sounds like a Honda argument.
It's amazing that some people have to be told the same thing so many times.
It's amazing that some people have to be told the same thing so many times.
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
Lets say you are going down the track and encounter a freak cloud of N2O gracefully floating above the track... In that case I suppose that is still NA however I seriously doubt that could never happen.
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
What is wrong with argument? If noone argued there was a better way, we would still be riding horses. And that equals 1 hp per horse. So get over the fact that people are going to disagree and it is normal for there to be posts that bring these differences to light.
Argue with that
Argue with that
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
I'd like to see the people who are saying using nitrous is N/A set up a street race around here saying theyre N/A & then pop the hood..... Next (& last) sound they here will probably be gun shots if any money changed hands
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
Originally Posted by slimdawson
What is wrong with argument? If noone argued there was a better way, we would still be riding horses. And that equals 1 hp per horse. So get over the fact that people are going to disagree and it is normal for there to be posts that bring these differences to light.
Argue with that
Argue with that

You're talking out your a$$.
Nobody is saying one is better than the other. If you want to be cute and clever, at least come up with something applicable.
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
There are horses with more than 1hp(standard not literal), for example: arabians and thoroughbreds...Not sure about Clydesdales though...I think they just have more low end Torque 
William

William
Re: differences between N/A and all-motor
Originally Posted by CARGASM
You're talking out your a$$.
Nobody is saying one is better than the other. If you want to be cute and clever, at least come up with something applicable.
Nobody is saying one is better than the other. If you want to be cute and clever, at least come up with something applicable.
Will69, I didn't know that. Clydes have to have a ton o torque


