LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Data Scan question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #1  
JDBlaze85's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 564
From: dallas, tx.
Data Scan question

I got this 93 Trans Am and it is runnin like crap. No power. heats up to 240F. Pings like a **** and backfires so I am sure it is a timing problem.
On the scanner, it shows 17 degrees SPARK AdV. at idle and at acceleration it falls to 0-10 degrees.

Now my questions are:::::::
Isnt the timing supposed to rise to 40? at accel and then slowly decline back to around 20 when cruising?

Is the SPARK ADV. pid on the scanner the ACTUAL timing on the engine or is it the timing that the PCM WANTS the engine to have??????????


The SPARK ADV does not ever pass 25 degrees while driving and has even hit negavite -10 degrees while cruising. It generally stays in the 0-10 degrees area. This is a 93 and I THINK these cars came with the chip in the PCM and I am thinking that the chip is to fault. any other suggestions would be appreciated. thanx


JD
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #2  
JDBlaze85's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 564
From: dallas, tx.
shoebox, injuneer?????????


anyone


my thread is floating awayyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 10:57 PM
  #3  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
What does your scanner indicate for "knock retard"? That's what you need to be looking at if it "pings like a ****".... if you can hear knock (which is different than "ping", but I suspect you mean "knock"). You should NEVER hear knock in a healthy engine. The ECM can pull up to 15deg timing to reduce knock to the inaudible level.... if you are still hearing it, you have a huge problem.

I've never looked at a 93 program, so I don't know if the spark tables are the same as the later models. The "advance" you read off the ECM is the value that the ECM hac calculated, using the timing table (deg advance vs. MAP/RPM), "+" any offsets from the IAT table "-" any spark retard. To get the total advance the ECM is calculating from the program table, if it had no knock retard, you need to add the "advance" number and the "knock retard number". In general, this will be the number programmed into the tables of advance vs. MAP/RPM, except for an occasional elusive 3deg extra advance that may come from the IAT offset (I've never seen anyone confirm the source, only that the 3deg does often appear).

In a 94+ the idle advance is 18-20 degrees. Some scanners will show advance as a "+", some scanners will show it as a "-". In any case, at idle, 17deg sounds normal. When you go to WOT (MAP = 95-100) advance will increase with RPM, ranging from 9deg at 1,000rpm to 33deg at 4000rpm (and higher at higher RPM... I just don't happen to have the high RPM table in front of me.) I'd say you can see 38-39deg at WOT/max RPM.

When you back off completely on the throttle, the ECM will back off on timing... you might see 10deg. When you are cruising at low throttle, moderate RPM, you will see as much as 45deg advance.
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:45 PM
  #4  
JDBlaze85's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 564
From: dallas, tx.
I already checked the knock sensor and it isnt doing anything. Its not indicating knock and not trying to subtract timing.
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #5  
JDBlaze85's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 564
From: dallas, tx.
this pinging noise........I only get it when the engine is under heavy load........like going up a hill or WOT acceleration. even accelrating off a stop, it will ping a bit.

there is no noise when there is no load or in nuetral. you can rev it up and wont hear a thing. it sounds good at idle but the rpm does swing up and down 700-900 uncontrollably.

also.......why would the scanner be showing 15+ idle then at accel drop and go the other direction. It will fall to 5+ degrees then 0 degrees -5 then -10 degrees. does not go further than -10 degrees. at 0 - -10, the engine runs horrible and will barely accel the car.

If the timing is all inside the ECM.......then wouldnt this automatically mean the ECM or ECM prom is screwed?

Last edited by JDBlaze85; Jun 14, 2004 at 11:51 PM.
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #6  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Have you checked the knock sensor wiring to make sure someone hasn't "desensitized" it? That's a popular mod for the 93's. If it pings or knocks, it should trigger the knock snesor circuit. You need to sort that out.

But with all the other problems... backfires, pinging, rough running.... it almost points to ignition timing problems, and the Opti could be the source, including dirty contacts on the harness connector, or even a high voltage ignition wire runnin too close and in parallel with the Opti harness.
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 05:19 PM
  #7  
JDBlaze85's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 564
From: dallas, tx.
Is the MAP sensor used to calculate timing?

Lets say the MAP sensor is faulty.......would this cause major retarding by the computer?

I looked into your timing chart and saw that the rpm and the kpa calculate advance. correct me if I'm wrong, but isnt the MAP sensor also the kpa sensor?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
dluna333
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
15
Mar 13, 2015 12:30 PM
aj2494
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
7
Mar 12, 2015 10:17 PM
grgguy
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
17
Feb 23, 2015 07:57 PM
Brent94Z
LT1 Based Engine Tech
14
Mar 21, 2002 04:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.