LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

CC306 Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 09:50 PM
  #1  
HM Murdock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
From: The Great State of Texas.
CC306 Question

How will it run with stock manifolds for one month, with programming, after which I will put hooker LT's on?

Also, how will it react with a low/no stall TC? I don't think mine is stock, but my tach is dead, so I can't really test it.
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 11:17 PM
  #2  
HM Murdock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
From: The Great State of Texas.
I guess no one knows...

Anyone have any ideas on this?
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 02:12 AM
  #3  
smokindastangs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 351
From: Marietta, Ga
If you decide to go w/ the 306, i will sell you one from comp, 100 shipped!! Lemme know!
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 02:54 AM
  #4  
Kain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 708
From: St. Louis, MO
It'll really suck under 2000 rpm. IMO, I'd get headers and stall first before you think of a cam.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:24 AM
  #5  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
i'm gonna go with kain here and say you need supporting mods first. this is a relatively big cam especially for a stock heads car with stock manifolds, keep in mind bigger is not always better. you could lose your low end with this cam and then your setup wont let you make power where the cam is made to run so your car has, marginal drivability, **** gas mileage more than likely, and in all likelyhood is slower than when it was stock
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 06:58 AM
  #6  
Smoke T/A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 718
From: Wichita Falls,Texas
Originally posted by WS6T3RROR
i'm gonna go with kain here and say you need supporting mods first. this is a relatively big cam especially for a stock heads car with stock manifolds, keep in mind bigger is not always better. you could lose your low end with this cam and then your setup wont let you make power where the cam is made to run so your car has, marginal drivability, **** gas mileage more than likely, and in all likelyhood is slower than when it was stock
It's been done before with stock manfolds but i dunno about on a A4 car. I would imagine it would be a dog at low rpms like mine was. I call bs being slower than stock. I had one in my 94z M6 before i put headers on or had ported heads and dynoed 340RWHP and 335RWTQ. And what does the stock motor put out 240/300???


Even though I made over 400 RWHP with that cam I'm more of a fan of the XE lobes. Like the 230/236 or 236/242. They produce more power under the curve and reach peak at a lower rpm than the magnum lobes (cc306). HTH

Joe
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 08:47 AM
  #7  
HM Murdock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
From: The Great State of Texas.
Well, i wasn't really concerned with losing power or anything, I know it isn't going ot give me drastic gains or anything, that's obvious. My main questionm is will it be driveable at all with this cam and no programming(I will need to drive it to the shop)...
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 05:22 PM
  #8  
smokindastangs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 351
From: Marietta, Ga
You can drive it to the shop if you want, just keep an eye on the temp gages b/c it might run a little lean. As long as it isn't a loong way to the show you should be fine. Many people put of the programing of their car for a while ( not a good idea) although they do have headers instead of the manifold.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #9  
HM Murdock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
From: The Great State of Texas.
Originally posted by smokindastangs
If you decide to go w/ the 306, i will sell you one from comp, 100 shipped!! Lemme know!
Sent you PM's...
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
HM Murdock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
From: The Great State of Texas.
You have another PM
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 05:47 PM
  #11  
smokindastangs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 351
From: Marietta, Ga
as do you
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #12  
EddieP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 477
From: Houston, TX
I did the the CC306 swap into a _COMPLETELY_ stock '93 T/A M6 many years ago... even had the stock cat-back on it. It was driveable, even with the stock programming on it... just felt a little soft on the bottom end (under 2k rpm). Going from stock intake, manifolds and stock exhaust to a CAI, cc306 programming, LT headers, and aftermarket exhaust dropped over a second off the e.t., and added over 10mph to my trap speed, though.

With an A4, I'd be a little reluctant... not because you don't have headers yet, but with a stock stall, it would be a pain to drive (probably stall out a lot, ect.).
Old Apr 6, 2003 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
92LT1RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 426
From: Slidell, LA
Originally posted by Smoke T/A
Even though I made over 400 RWHP with that cam I'm more of a fan of the XE lobes. Like the 230/236 or 236/242. They produce more power under the curve and reach peak at a lower rpm than the magnum lobes (cc306). HTH


I was checking through the Comp Cams catalog and the only cams I found that had those specs were the XE Retrofit cams. Is that what you have to use? The cams for factory hydraulic roller all said EXCEPT LT1/4, and under the LT1/4 listings there weren't any that had those duration specs. Sorry if this seems like a noob question, I'm just beginning to look for another cam, I've got a Hotcam right now and want something bigger. Thanks
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dluna333
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
15
Mar 13, 2015 12:30 PM
jasonduaine
LS1 Based Engine Tech
3
Mar 7, 2015 09:44 AM
StansZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
Feb 19, 2015 07:39 AM
95z_28_camaro_4_Ivan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Dec 19, 2014 08:48 PM
Hurin
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Dec 13, 2014 07:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.