LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

BEST CAM TO GET FOR STOCK HEADS?? please reply

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #16  
madwolf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,577
From: DeKalb, IL
My 233/239 produced 348 RWHP on stock heads in an automatic.
I didn't rev it that high either.
It sounds mean and driveability is pretty good.
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 03:13 PM
  #17  
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,997
From: Reading, PA
All three of those cams have been shown to work well on stock heads. The 224/230 is obviously the biggest, it's up to you.
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 03:50 PM
  #18  
ttopz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 95
From: Dallas, TX
I'm amazed by how much ya'll know. There is no definitive source for cam information though.... I guess it's just something you pick up. How do you know when you should upgrade other components too? (hardened pushrods, roller rockers, springs, etc)
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #19  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
If you're looking for a good balance of idle, driveability, and power, may I suggest the 218/224. Couple of guys putting mid 340's HP AND TQ to the ground with this and bolt on's, and it doesn't need to be revved to the moon. Flat TQ curve, good all around power, and if emissions are a concern this one would be no problem.

Numbers aren't everything. Those 11.9X times are on 1.6 short times, some of those cams run good HP numbers but are lacking on the TQ curve.

Just my $.02
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #20  
hairbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 386
From: Hickory,NC 28601
Originally posted by scoobysnax83
I know I said the CC305 earlier. But I think that XE224/230 is the best choice.
Is the XE224/230 a Comp Cam? And what is the lobe seperation on it?
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #21  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Yes, that is a comp cam. And the LSA is typically 112, but you can make it higher or lower depending on emmisions or gas milage.

I second the vote for the XE218/224

Dan
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #22  
joeSS97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,781
From: Detroit area
Yup 218/224 gets my vote.
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #23  
FormulaLT-1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 155
From: Marine Corp Mountain Warfare Training Center
now the question is, what springs/rockers, etc. do I need / want.

can I use 30,000 mile lifters?
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #24  
Daryn95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 177
From: Spring, TX
For springs I went with CM612 from CMotorsports, single spring (no machining) good to .600, only $89.95 and 1.6 Non self-aligning pro mags from comp w/guide plates and new hardened pushrods.

As for lifters if yours look like they are in good shape there really is no need to get new ones with any of the cams mentioned.(mild cams)
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #25  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
I only read one post regarding the CC502, 218/224. That's the cam I'm going with. Produces good power and torque curve is more like a torque line. Road racing rules
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:23 PM
  #26  
FormulaLT-1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 155
From: Marine Corp Mountain Warfare Training Center
Originally posted by Daryn95Z
For springs I went with CM612 from CMotorsports, single spring (no machining) good to .600, only $89.95 and 1.6 Non self-aligning pro mags from comp w/guide plates and new hardened pushrods.

As for lifters if yours look like they are in good shape there really is no need to get new ones with any of the cams mentioned.(mild cams)

I was thinking about going with the GM 847.

but the spring the cam card suggests is only good to .585 lift... not good if I were to run 1.6's.

how many people are running the CMotorsports spring? (looking for reliability.)
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:24 PM
  #27  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally posted by FlyBono24
What's the price and HP difference between the LT4 and the CC305?
About 10rwhp from what I've seen. It's pretty much across the RPM range though, from about 2500 rpm and up.

Dan
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:28 PM
  #28  
dkeers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 534
From: Avon, IN, USA
Originally posted by hairbear
Is the XE224/230 a Comp Cam? And what is the lobe seperation on it?
I have the XE 224/230 on a 114 LSA. I think most people get it on a 112 LSA.

Dustin
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 10:20 PM
  #29  
formula king's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 219
From: CLEAR LAKE, TX
i heard that the 224/230 comp cam require A/M heads to work, at thunder racing.com
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 10:52 PM
  #30  
S.J.S.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,201
From: HI.
HotCam. Regardless of what you hear. The CC305 and the Hotcam are basically the same. You could drive 2 seperate cars and with all things being equal except the cam they would perform about the same. I say Hotcam cause you can get the whole kit cheap.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.