LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

ASM monoblade question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 03:21 PM
  #1  
sheikss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 32
From: Columbus, GA
ASM monoblade question?

Well tryin to do a few things to the car before I get it dyno tuned again. Just wondering if going from a 58mm BBK to the ASM monoblade would net some impressive gains. The car is a 383 with le2 heads and a le3.2 cam with all the bolt ons.
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #2  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
no. jmho
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by BUBBA
no. jmho
I think you will find the to be a common response.
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I dynoed at 500 flywheel HP on my 381 with the 58mm throttle body only 77% open. Opening it farther did not increase air flow.
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
1989TransAm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
The idea is to keep the plenum as close as posible to 100kpa at wide open throttle. So at wide open throttle and say at max rpm what is your kpa reading?

If you are lower than 100kpa then the question is by how much and why. Is the air filter the restriction? Is it the air intake track? Is it the throttle body? These are questions that need to be answered.

Is there a big perfomance gain to be had? Probably not unless you are after every last horsepower.
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #6  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
i would think you need more headflow and more cam to take advantage of the monoblade. I dont think your setup is extreme enough for it to make any difference. Maybe a few hp (5-6)
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Compare the MAP to barometric pressure, which may or may not be 100kPa. You get both data points with a scanner.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #8  
sheikss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 32
From: Columbus, GA
Thanks for the info. I'll talk to Ed when I go dyno again. I got a feeling he'll sat it's not worth it. I've heard that it's hard to get the car to idle with them so.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #9  
1989TransAm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Let me add to the post a little bit. I'm currently running the AS&M monoblade on my 1989 TransAm. I thought the fluctuations in my KPA at high rpm was the intake system not being able to keep up with the demands of the motor.

With a huge K&N air filter and 3.5" cold air intake pipe I knew those were not the problem. So that is why I went to the 1300cfm monoblade. Come to find out my problem may have been reversion because of weak Comp Cams 26918 beehive valve springs with my XFI 268 cam. They tested between 95 and 100 pounds at 1.800". At the installed height of 1.750" the poundage did not change. However at 1.200" they were at 330#.

Let me qualify this in that I'm also running a Yank SS3600 converter. Anyways I have no drivability or idle issues with the monoblade. In fact no problems at all.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wilson
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Jul 21, 2002 05:08 PM
Wilson
Car Audio and Electronics
7
Jul 21, 2002 04:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.