LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

440 rwhp N/A on stock bottomend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2003, 08:26 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Fastbird93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Waynesboro, PA
Posts: 4,827
If this cam is going to be readily available, I got dibs on one!!!!!
Fastbird93 is offline  
Old 10-13-2003, 09:18 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Angie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 136
Here's the dyno graphs:


Comparison of his best run before heads/cam and the 440 hp graph:

http://www.thunderracing.com/images/...omparison1.jpg


Comparison of the graphs as the car came in Saturday and going into "race trim" and Geoff's tuning:

http://www.thunderracing.com/images/...comparison.jpg

Angie

Last edited by Angie; 10-13-2003 at 09:21 AM.
Angie is offline  
Old 10-13-2003, 09:44 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 5,645
Originally posted by Angie
Here's the dyno graphs:


Comparison of his best run before heads/cam and the 440 hp graph:

http://www.thunderracing.com/images/...omparison1.jpg


Comparison of the graphs as the car came in Saturday and going into "race trim" and Geoff's tuning:

http://www.thunderracing.com/images/...comparison.jpg

Angie
Looks like hp peaked @ 6700rpm
RealQuick is offline  
Old 10-13-2003, 10:59 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
95_RipperZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 783
All I can say is wow.

What did the heads flow?
95_RipperZ is offline  
Old 10-13-2003, 11:35 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Ken95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 738
Steve, What converter are you using? And stall speed? and also what rear gear do you currently have?

Power looks good, hopefully it performs just as well on the track.
By the look of the torque curve looks like you going to need a pretty high stall to keep it up in the power band.

Oops - Did you have the converter locked on this run? If so did you do a run un-locked to see where the torque was?

Sorry for all the questions, just courious...
Ken95Z28 is offline  
Old 10-13-2003, 08:05 PM
  #36  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SAR2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 435
Arrow

Thanks Angie for posting the graphs! Sucks not having the net at work!
Ken, I'm still running a Vigilante 3600 with 3.73 gears and yes we locked the converter on the all out pull.
The car should be making even more power by time you see it at the Shootout next month... I have two "Dyno records" to break LOL.
Steve...
SAR2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 04:16 AM
  #37  
On permanent vacation
 
TreySpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan is a decent state.
Posts: 520
i meant dynojet or mustang dyno or something else? unless thunder racing is producing dynos?
TreySpeed is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 04:38 AM
  #38  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SAR2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 435
Thumbs up

Dyno Jet.
SAR2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 04:51 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
QCKZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Christiansburg, VA
Posts: 1,853
SAE corrected?
QCKZ28 is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 05:03 AM
  #40  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SAR2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 435
Yep SAE corrected.
Also the cam is in the .600 range.
Steve...
SAR2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:48 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
TwEaKeDSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 125
Originally posted by SAR2K
Yep SAE corrected.
Also the cam is in the .600 range.
Steve...
.600 lift on a hydraulic roller? That's kinda pushing things a bit.
TwEaKeDSS is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:56 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
bunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,305
Wow that is pushing things a bit, all it might take is for it to over-rev once & let the valves float there for a bit & pistons introduce themselves to the valves

But congrats man that is just amazing!
bunker is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 09:57 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
95Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, la
Posts: 989
he does have the rev kit on it so it should help with valve float.

Tim
95Bird is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 01:17 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Paul @ Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 55
Originally posted by bunker
Wow that is pushing things a bit, all it might take is for it to over-rev once & let the valves float there for a bit & pistons introduce themselves to the valves

Actually it has tons of piston to valve clearance, over .200 if I remember correct. The valve lift has little to do with the P/V clearance since peak lift only occurs when the piston is at the bottom of the stroke. The duration and lobe profile is the real determining factor. The lift does play a role but only a small part.

Also like Tim said the motor does have a Hydra-Rev kit as well.

Last edited by Paul @ Thunder; 10-14-2003 at 02:16 PM.
Paul @ Thunder is offline  
Old 10-14-2003, 01:24 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
zhevy-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Boulder, CO. USA
Posts: 506
You guys at Thunder Racing, have come a long way to provide not only a complete internet race shop, but now a reputable speed shop. That's great to hear. Very few can stay consistent in their services these days, but growing also.
-Goose

PS: Paul, I've got my tubular K-member. Niece piece. Thanks!

Last edited by zhevy-1; 10-14-2003 at 02:04 PM.
zhevy-1 is offline  


Quick Reply: 440 rwhp N/A on stock bottomend



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.